User talk:Bacilah

This is Bacilah's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dainius Liulys (June 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ratnahastin was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dainius Liulys and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ratnahastin (talk) 13:09, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bacilah! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ratnahastin (talk) 13:09, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @Ratnahastin, I don't understand why did you deleted this page. If it looks like advertising to you, so why I can find also pages like this: Tadas Karosas? Bacilah (talk) 13:37, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I did not delete your article, I don't have the power to do that. Advertising and promotion is against Wikipedia's purpose. The article you linked is problematic aswell, it needs to be rewritten. Ratnahastin (talk) 14:01, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And will it be? Because then its not right from my point of view. 78.61.215.62 (talk) 14:04, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darius_Mockus

https://lt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robertas_Dargis

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visvaldas_Matijo%C5%A1aitis

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nerijus_Numavi%C4%8Dius

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gediminas_%C5%BDiemelis

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrius_Janukonis

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Okman

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ram%C5%ABnas_Karbauskis

@Ratnahastin Those are also Lithuanian businessmen's / entrepreneurs, are those articles also considering as advertising?

In my article only facts and confirmed information are used. Therefore I do not understand the reasoning behind not publishing the article as only facts and publicly known and confirmed information are in it. I also added links to sources - respected business media channels and magazines in Lithuania (which itself ranks at 13th place in World Press Freedom rating, btw). If you do not agree with any of the facts that are stated, could you please specify which of the facts are false and what critical information is missing? Bacilah (talk) 14:47, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Dainius Liulys

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Dainius Liulys, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Ratnahastin (talk) 13:09, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Bacilah. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Dainius Liulys, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Ratnahastin (talk) 13:10, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Bacilah/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 19:24, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dainius Liulys (July 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by 1AmNobody24 were:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dainius Liulys and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nobody (talk) 05:32, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]