User talk:BOBBOBLEYBOBSON

Welcome!

Hello, BOBBOBLEYBOBSON, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Overthinking syndrome, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Jus da fax 22:40, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Overthinking syndrome

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Overthinking syndrome requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Jus da fax 22:40, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Elevator— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(✉) 21:35, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect for Tilidin

Hi Bob, I created a redirect out of your recent article Tilidin as it could be a reasonable search term for Tilidine which has an article, and did not appear to say anything extra that would require a merge. Agent00x (talk) 22:27, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Hi BOBBOBLEYBOBSON! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Heroin that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. major, major changes made marked as minor. Graywalls (talk) 03:53, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Overthinking syndrome

Hello, BOBBOBLEYBOBSON. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Overthinking syndrome".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 23:25, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jorrit van der Kooi

The article Jorrit van der Kooi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not sure if this is a WP:BLP, so haven't done a BLP PROD. But it appears WP:BIO1E applies.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Singularity42 (talk) 19:17, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jorrit van der Kooi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jorrit van der Kooi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jorrit van der Kooi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Singularity42 (talk) 13:30, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jorrit van der Kooi moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jorrit van der Kooi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 22:16, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jorrit van der Kooi

Hello, BOBBOBLEYBOBSON. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jorrit van der Kooi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:02, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jorrit van der Kooi

Hello, BOBBOBLEYBOBSON. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jorrit van der Kooi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:29, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]