User talk:Azlankazmi

January 2024

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Reema Khan have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Reema Khan was changed by Azlankazmi (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.909804 on 2024-01-09T03:40:36+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:40, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. ... discospinster _talk 18:30, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To expand on the above statement. I notice that almost all of the changes you have made have been flagged by you as 'fixed typo' - such a flag really only applies to fixing spelling mistakes and/or punctuation. Most of your changes have involved insertion of almost an entire sentence, which is NOT just fixing a typo. Please use more accurate editing summaries in future.

I also notice that almost all of your edits have been reverted, for various reasons. In particular, you have often just restated something which is already in the article, or you have expanded the 'short description' which is meant to be short.

Another matter is the insertion of subjective words e.g. beautiful. Wikipedia is meant to be about verifiable information, so an adjective such as this needs a reliable source.

Please consider the above remarks as you continue to edit Wikipedia. I hope you enjoy the experience. Murray Langton (talk) 19:41, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Imad, you may be blocked from editing. UtherSRG (talk) 12:30, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

National varieties of English

Hello. In a recent edit to the page Nawaz Sharif, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the first author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 18:29, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Nauman335 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nauman335. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 12:39, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Appeal for unblocking my Wikipedia account

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Azlankazmi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia Administrators, I hope this message reaches you promptly. I am writing to appeal the indefinite block on my Wikipedia account Azlan Kazmi), which was imposed due to the suspicion that it may be a sockpuppet account of User:Nauman335. I want to clarify that I am utilizing my mobile service provider's internet connection and have no connection with User:Nauman335. I understand the gravity of sockpuppetry and its implications on Wikipedia's integrity. However, I assure you that I am an independent user who has been contributing in good faith and adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines. Given my use of a mobile service provider's internet connection, my IP address is subject to change, and I acknowledge that this may have led to confusion. I request a thorough review of the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nauman335, with consideration for the dynamic nature of mobile IP addresses. If there are specific concerns or allegations against my account, I kindly ask for detailed information so that I can address them directly. I am committed to transparent and constructive communication to resolve this matter and to continue contributing positively to the Wikipedia community. I understand the importance of maintaining the integrity of Wikipedia, and I am fully committed to upholding the standards of the platform. I request the administrators to reconsider the indefinite block on my account and allow me the opportunity to contribute to Wikipedia in a meaningful and collaborative manner. Thank you for your immediate attention to this matter. I look forward to a fair and just resolution. Sincerely, Azlan Kazmi

Decline reason:

Please describe concisely and clearly how your edits merited a block, what you would do differently, and what constructive edits you would make. Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:12, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

please unblock my account

Dear Wikipedia Administrators, I hope this message reaches you promptly. I am writing to appeal the indefinite block on my Wikipedia account Azlan Kazmi), which was imposed due to the suspicion that it may be a sockpuppet account of User:Nauman335. I want to clarify that I am utilizing my mobile service provider's internet connection and have no connection with User:Nauman335. I understand the gravity of sockpuppetry and its implications on Wikipedia's integrity. However, I assure you that I am an independent user who has been contributing in good faith and adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines. Given my use of a mobile service provider's internet connection, my IP address is subject to change, and I acknowledge that this may have led to confusion. I request a thorough review of the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nauman335, with consideration for the dynamic nature of mobile IP addresses. If there are specific concerns or allegations against my account, I kindly ask for detailed information so that I can address them directly. I am committed to transparent and constructive communication to resolve this matter and to continue contributing positively to the Wikipedia community. I understand the importance of maintaining the integrity of Wikipedia, and I am fully committed to upholding the standards of the platform. I request the administrators to reconsider the indefinite block on my account and allow me the opportunity to contribute to Wikipedia in a meaningful and collaborative manner. Thank you for your immediate attention to this matter. I look forward to a fair and just resolution. Sincerely, Azlan Kazmi please u Azlankazmi (talk) 15:48, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]