User talk:Az1568/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Az1568. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5

A welcome from Sango123

Hello, 1568, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

If you haven't already, drop by the New user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments.
The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
Simplified Ruleset
How to edit a page
Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Manual of Style
Wikipedia Glossary

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make goofy mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy editing!

–Sango 123 (e) 03:31, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

Your username

Any particular reason you've chosen 1568 as your username? Just curious. Ëvilphoenix ^Burn! 05:47, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

Fixed Vandalism

Hey man, I just noticed you fixed vandalism on my user page, thanks alot. Wikioogle=world take over 16:08, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

Question about Wikipedia

Do you by any chance know how much space (in terabytes) Wikipedia approximately takes up? --GoOdCoNtEnT 20:19, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Public Appology

Sorry for vandalizing that page. Sometimes you just got to do stupid things, but that doesn't mean I should have vandalized a wikipedia article. It was wrong. -elbow —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.109.11.146 (talk • contribs) .

Thanks!

Thanks for the revert on my user page! Dunno what I did wrong to deserve that... CaptainVindaloo ^{t c e} 01:56, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Good lookin' out for me too. I guess my Indian friend is back :-). CQJ 05:38, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Sorry my comment was not vandal in nature and was true.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.236.150.102 (talk • contribs) .

IPA

Please revert the recent vandalism on the International Phonetic Alphabet page. --Siva 18:56, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism reverted--1568 19:06, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Reply to your question

Hi -- I see no problem with your removing the anonymous vandal's additions to this page. They're unconstructive and troll-like, so have at it. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 09:19, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

What gives you the right?

Just a question, I thought we weren't supposed to delete entries from our talk page. Just because some other cyber-censor things it's ok to, does not give you the right to do it. You should hold yourself to a higher wikimoral-standard because you are in a wikiposition of wikipower.

My words were not meant to be annoying. There is an error on your user page. You state you have been vandalized twice, but in reality it has been more than that. I am simply wondering why you are being dishonest. You shouldn't just jump to conclusions because you have some sort of bizarre internet power.

This isn't a flame, or a troll, it's my POV, and you're not supposed to delete it off of your user page just because you don't like it. Remember "staying_cool".

Read below and please ensure you understand it prior to commenting further.

In working on Wikipedia, you may occasionally get into a dispute with another person. That person may seem like a troll or a hothead to you, but it's usually best to assume that you are dealing with a reasonable person who is simply confused on a particular issue or has a POV different from your own. No matter what the problem is, flaming is not going to solve it. Try to reach a truce.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.115.28.78 (talk • contribs) .

Blocking vandal

You're very welcome. I'm not particularly tolerant of that level of sustained personal attacks and vandalism. Good luck, Gwernol 22:45, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, and I have my blocking hat on :-) We'll play whack-a-mole for a while and eventually he'll go away. Sorry for the disruption you might get in the meantime. Think of it as proof that you've done the right thing. Good luck, Gwernol 23:02, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, 1568! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. AmiDaniel (talk) 03:22, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Hi

Hi, I just vandalized the article, "Lunch Ladies" and my friend dared me to do it(and i got 10 dollars from him) and I never vandalize stuff. I just figured I should tell ya. 12.73.120.137 23:57, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Vandal

What is with user 172.129.254.23? (S)he's been vandalizing like crazy. Can this be stopped?

MarylandArtLover

VandalBot

They haven't edited since 2004 and it's not a new user. Did you just happen to come across it? --Woohookitty^(meow) 08:19, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

VandalBot is already indefinitly blocked. You should check the Block Log and Contributions of vandals before you add them.--Koji Dude 08:27, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Actually no. It wasn't blocked before about half an hour ago. In the end it doesn't matter. It's just a bit preemptive is all. --Woohookitty^(meow) 08:39, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

You don't have to be sorry. I didn't mean to come off in that kind of tone, I was just advising you for future reference. As long as your intetnions are good, apologies aren't needed. =) --Koji Dude 08:42, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

I am Leperchaun. I just for got to log in. I know Jorcoga, he is in the same room as me & he does not want his name revealed. 203.122.254.26 03:06, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

If you are the owner of User:Leperchaun, please log in before you edit your user page and don’t reveal any users real name without their consent.--1568 03:40, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

User:Leperchaun

Hi. A couple of days ago you reverted the blanking of the above user page. It turns out the blanking was by a user whose real name had been posted on the user page. This is just a notice that I have deleted all of the revisions containing this user's real name, including the reversion by you. - Mark 12:46, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

EDIT: Judging by the above, the reversion wasn't by the named person. But either way. The revision removal was in response to a AN/I post. - Mark 12:49, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

500+ edits in 5 days. wow. 74.237.245.199 04:32, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from not reading the entire edits before deleting them. WJXR was a test and you, Mr. Censor, failed. You removed the minor vandalism but also removed the two improvements (capitalization of a radio station's call letters and correction of the spelling of "miscellaneous"). Ha! Ha HA! 74.237.245.199 04:36, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

You are a robot. You would be great in the government. Or working for a corporation. Thanks for the automatic response. Enjoy spending countless hours editing out vandalism/saving the world from twits like me. I am off to read my Umberto Eco book. 74.237.245.199 04:43, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

You're welcome and have a nice day!--1568 04:56, 13 August 2006 (UTC)