User talk:Ayyanali2100

Ayyanali2100, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Ayyanali2100! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Imtiaz supermarket

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Imtiaz supermarket, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Hitro talk 17:41, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gamerafts Inc

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gamerafts Inc requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Mean as custard (talk) 11:50, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of video game developers

Please note that like most lists on Wikipedia, List of video game developers lists only entries where there is a Wikipedia article about the company. The only exceptions to this are a few cases where there is a Wikipedia article about one or more of the company's games (and ony if those are in fact listed in the article). Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 10:34, 30 November 2016 (UTC) Well said but paon is also on that list but it also don't have any Notable games....[reply]

Welcome

Hello, Ayyanali2100, and welcome to Wikipedia! Here are some pages that will help you to find your way around, understand key policies and guidelines, and develop your contributions:
help and information	contributing to articles	policies and guidelines
frequently asked questions where to ask a question wikipedia's community learn from others department directory editor's index	how to edit a page how to develop an article manual of style notability verifiability no original research	our five pillars index of policies index of guidelines etiquette about your user page deletion policy
Please sign your name whenever you leave a comment by using four tildes (~~~~), which produces your name and the date. Whenever you edit a page, even if the edit is minor, you should include a descriptive edit summary. If you need help, visit the help desk, or place `{{helpme}}` and a question on your talk page and someone will respond shortly. If you would like mentoring, you can join the adopt-a-user project. I hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia and find it a rewarding experience. – sami ^talk 05:54, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship

Most administrators have been on Wikipedia for many years before they get elected - two months is not nearly enough. I have deleted your nomination per WP:NOTNOW. I strongly suggest you read that and take it all in. Keep on making good edits, join in community discussions, and by all means try again in a few years. Giant Snowman 08:07, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 15:00, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ayyanali2100 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I dont know what had I done wrong. I just make good edits and only that. I also created a Wikipedia page Imtiaz supermarket and I don't know what's wrong in that The only accounts which are attached to me are only 2 that you can also check on my user page edit history While the message that is displayed on my page right now states that there are 6 accounts. OK if this is right then can you please tell the names of that accounts which even I don't know. Ayyanali2100 (talk) 16:09, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It's not clear you understand your actions were inappropriate. In fact, you say, "there is nothing wrong I did with these accounts", when we've pointed out you have been violating WP:SOCK. Yamla (talk) 13:28, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What makes you think there are 6 accounts? Why did you remove the disclosure of your two other accounts? What makes you think it's permissible to have other accounts who edit the same pages as this account? That's strictly against policy.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:43, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ayyanali2100 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please include the original unblock request.

Decline reason:

No reason for unblock specified. Also, duplicate request. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:59, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

But there is nothing wrong I did with these accounts. If you want to block then you can block other two accounts and leave Ayyanali2100 unblocked. Furthermore, I am new to Wikipedia and I was not aware of wikipedia policy previously. I am also not associated with Imtiaz supermarket by any means. You might be ymthinking that I am using multiple accounts to promote this page than this is totally false--Ayyanali2100(talk) 21 January 2017 (UTC)

It is simply not the case that "there is nothing wrong I did with these accounts". You've been repeatedly pointed to WP:SOCK and clearly haven't bothered to read it. So let me highlight a part: "Contributing to the same page or discussion with multiple accounts: Editors may not use more than one account to contribute to the same page or discussion in a way that suggests they are multiple people". You admit to having done this, but not that it's in violation of our policies. This simply shows you haven't read our policies, and means your unblock request will most certainly be denied. We've told you that you've been violating WP:SOCK. We've pointed you to WP:SOCK. You must go and read and understand WP:SOCK, and modify your unblock request so as to convince us you have read and understood WP:SOCK and we can be sure you won't use multiple accounts, in violation of WP:SOCK, again. --Yamla (talk) 01:32, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ayyanali2100 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here Ayyanali2100 (talk) 15:52, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am afraid that I cannot unblock you at this time. I would suggest demonstrating that you can behave in a collaborative environment (e.g. another wiki) for 6 months, and then request an unblock under the standard offer. SQL ^{Query me!} 04:35, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.