User talk:Ayush219

Welcome!

Hello, Ayush219, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! — kashmīrī ^TALK 19:16, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Hello, I'm Rdp060707. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Bhumihar Brahmin, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ----Rdp060707|talk 16:23, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The current page for Bhumihar is not stating correct information. There are lots of wrong thing in the articles. How to correct those? Ayush219 (talk) 16:25, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Biharis. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Biharis was changed by Ayush219 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.861529 on 2024-04-20T17:43:58+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:44, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think there is a case of vandalism. Could you please explain if it is? I have just corrected the word. Its meaning remains same.

Thank you! Ayush219 (talk) 17:54, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It may not have been your intention, but one of your edits may have been a change that some consider controversial. Due to this, your edits may have been reverted. When making possibly controversial changes, it is good practice to first discuss your edit on the article's talk page before making it, to gain consensus over whether or not to include the text, phrasing, etc. If you believe that the information you added was correct, please initiate that discussion. Thank you. — kashmīrī ^TALK 19:13, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

Please STOP mass-changing "Bhumihar" to "Bhumihar Brahmin" in articles without first discussing the idea at Talk:Bhumihar. You need a consensus before going for such mass changes.

All your changes have been reverted. — kashmīrī ^TALK 19:15, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'm ready to discuss. Ayush219 (talk) 19:20, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There used to be an article Bhumihar Brahmin, which now directs to bhumihar. Ayush219 (talk) 19:21, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bhumihar Brahmin was redirected to Bhumihar because of this consensus. If you recreate this article, it will be deleted unless a new consensus is formed to keep it. Also, If you want to change Bhumihar to Bhumihar Brahmin, best will be to engage with other India-focused editors at Talk:Bhumihar and/or at WT:INDIA. I doubt it will be very likely, though, because of many past discussions about the topic. — kashmīrī ^TALK 19:25, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

yes, I can discuss. But there should be people belonging to that community also. Its a small community. Outsiders shouldn't dictate the terms which is very personal. Ayush219 (talk) 19:27, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good to keep in mind that Wikipedia is not anyone's personal encyclopaedia. If you are a Bhumihar, I suggest you avoid writing about Bhumihars (read WP:COI) – there's plenty of other topics to write about. — kashmīrī ^TALK 19:30, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— kashmīrī ^TALK 19:28, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you should discuss. It shouldn't be like this. Whether I belong any this community or not shouldn't concern you. You are being Casteist and racist here. Ayush219 (talk) 19:39, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will raise this issue of you being derogatory to a community Ayush219 (talk) 19:40, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — kashmīrī ^TALK 21:39, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]