User talk:Axeman89

Hello! Couple days back you have deleted most of my additions on page Rakvere. Can you explain little bit that why those entries didn't fit? Majandus6 (talk) 10:51, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tere, Majandus6! Thank you for asking. I felt that the information was too specific, and not the kinds of things that you usually find on pages for towns, including other Estonian towns, although maybe I should have changed the sentence on Rakvere having bus/train connections to say something about the bus and train stations, and the rail line Rakvere is on.--Axeman89 (talk) 14:17, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for explanation! This was good notion. I will keep that in mind when I do next changes. I will look that bus and train station part.Majandus6 (talk) 15:11, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds great!--Axeman89 (talk) 15:34, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I descend from John Pool, senator from NC.

I don't think he was involved wit the Red Stringers and traveled through mountains of VA.

He had cousins in VA with the same name. He became a Union sympathiser, but he was involved with the NC government in Raleigh during the time period you mentioned. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1003:B465:253D:6E42:160A:1B7:8176 (talk) 14:30, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please tell me what I did wrong. I assure you it was an accident. Axeman89 22:33, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies if I mistakenly flagged you. Sometimes looking at the diffs it gets confusing who posted what. I'm battling the vandals too and it looks like I accidentally sent out some friendly fire. Mea Culpa. SnappingTurtle 14:40, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! I may have done it myself once (either that, or accidentally defended a vandal). Axeman89 00:11, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Jack Thompson Biography

This may not be the right place for this, but I am new to wikipedia - you recently scolded me for the "vandalism" of the Jack Thompson Biography - the only thing I edited in that article was a bit of bad grammar and strange sentence structure - I really don't understand how that constitutes vandalising someone elses work? Pentagram6 16:25, 14 October 2006

Sorry. As you can see above, I've had that happen to myself as well. I apologize. Check your old page. Axeman89 07:19, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proofreading "Sea Tigers"

Hi - thanks for your effort, seems quite a few errors when I looked up your corrections. Thanks again. Ulflarsen 16:13, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No problem Axeman89 21:50, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the advice

...but what did you mean specifically? :) //Big Adamsky 01:32, 10 February 2006 (UTC) ??? Don't post info on clan members. Axeman89 01:33, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Think there's a mixup here, Axeman99 probably mean this, thus Big Adamsky had nothing to do with that entry. Scoo 12:12, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. So sorry! Axeman89 16:41, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hila class

I replied to your query on Talk:Finnish Navy. --Laisak 18:16, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Axeman89 00:51, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New wiki

Hello, I followed your depression userbox here, I'm looking for people who might be interested in a new wiki I'm working on. It's for and about people with depression. Hopefully it will be a good, comprehensive site one day, but right now it's a couple of articles and some help pages. If you are interested in having a look and maybe contributing, please come on over. It's at Wikicities, Jimbo and Angela's wiki-hosting project. The url is http://depression.wikicities.com . Hope to see you there -- sannse (talk) 14:30, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nadir and Zenith

I reverted your reverts on BattleTech technology. If you compare the definitions of the two original words you'll notice that the meaning in the BattleTech Universe is something completely different. The sentence doesn't even parse; maybe the gravity above and below a star is lower than elsewhere in the BattleTech universe (which would be a silly idea in our universe), but Nadir and Zenith:

are not at a certain place relative to a body, only relative to a body and an observer and
are not limited to suns nor usually found on suns, since the observer must be on the surface of the body.

Please let's work on an alternative phrase if you don't like the current one. --Yooden

See also this and the next two edits. --Yooden

Lyrics at Spieluhr (song)

For future reference, lyrics are copyrighted material and they cannot be posted on Wikipedia. If you come across any more articles like Spieluhr (song), tag it with {{db}} so an administrator can delete it. ~MDD 46 96 03:17, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up, although I believe that that song was likely as public domain as "The Itsy Bitsy Spider." I didn't post the lyrics, did I?

You didn't post the lyrics, I just saw that you tagged the article with "cleanup". Spieluhr is a song by Rammstein, released in 2001. Definately not PD. ~MDD 46 96 17:35, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, okay. I thought it was based on an old German nursery rhyme. Axeman89 17:59, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PTSD, CSR, Railway Spine -> Combination

There does not appear to be any discussion on combining these three articles, which you tagged on or about June 23, 2006. It appears that CSR is a subset of PTSD and should not be combined directly with PTSD. Railway Spine appears to just be another name (earlier incarnation) for PTSD and should be combined, although maybe just with a one line comment. This is just my opinion of course. Do we need a further consensus, or may this work be done with only one interested discusser? - Yendor 22:51, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think the better parts of the railway spine article could be added to the PTSD article, but I don't have the time to do it myself, at least for the next week. Axeman89 13:37, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's LGBT Community

Hi, Axeman89!
You've indicated through various means (a userbox, membership in a category, etc) that you are part of the Wikipedia LGBT community, or are interested in Wikipedia's LGBT related pages. Welcome!

You may not know that Wikipedia has both an LGBT Notice Board and an LGBT Studies WikiProject. If you haven't yet done so, take a look at both of them. They sorely need attention and participation!

Some things on the "To-Do List" that merit particular attention include:

Identifying topics/pages that need attention
Identifying problems that need addressing

Adding the LGBT template to appropriate pages
Categorizing LGBT pages

Please feel free to participate in any or all of these activities! And if you feel like it, add yourself to either the Noticeboard Members or the WikiProject Participants - or both!

Glad you're a part of Wikipedia - and Thanks!

This invitation posted here by SatyrTN -- talk
Please remove it if you so desire.

Thanks

-- Lost^(talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!

Hey thanks for appreciating :) -- Lost^(talk) 17:40, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick reply, I would've smiled on you if I had known those existed. Axeman89 17:45, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Axeman89 21:14, 21 October 2006 (UTC)"

"What do you want to improve ? For now I think there is enoght." Previous unsigned statement by 76.16.183.57 (talk · contribs), 15:17, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You say that there is enough, so you delete what exists? Besides, do you honestly believe there was enough information already? Can you justify deleting the entire history of antisemitism? Axeman89 23:17, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

That's the second time you've beat me to the punch when I was trying to revert a vandal (anti-semitism). You keep that up Mister, and I might just have to... nominate you for admin ;) Jcam 21:27, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jcam has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!

Many thanks! Axeman89 23:17, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hey what gives

I think you flagged me for editing teh Gliese 581 c article.

When i visited the link it had "what the fuck" written in excess of 100 times and no real article. Becasue my wikipedia editing skills are basic i decide to put in "broken link" in stead of all the curse words untill an advanced user could correct the problem. It was not vandalism. Enstantkill 22:24, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry! For some reason, I didn't even bother to check what it looked like before you changed the article. There was an article before the person before you edited it. I see that you've made productive edits. Sorry about that. Axeman89 01:04, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In the future, you can go back to the last good edit, and then save. It will replace the current version. Axeman89 01:07, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NATO grades/EST national ranks

Hi

Hopefully you can change NATO grades and EST military ranks matrix. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estonian_Defence_Forces

Correct would be:

OR-1 No insignia OR-2 Kapral OR-3 Nooremseersant, seersant OR-4 Vanemseersant OR-5 Nooremveebel OR-6 Veebel OR-7 Vanemveebel OR-8 Staabiveebel OR-9 :Ulembeebel

Also picture "Estonian Soldier" is out of date by uniform. Newer ones are available here: http://www.mil.ee/~fotek/gallery/albums.php

Cheers

D.

Why are you unable to change the NATO grades/EST national ranks, and why did you come to me to change them? Axeman89 19:26, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Clan Snow Raven

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Clan Snow Raven, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Clan Snow Raven. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 22:18, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ertugrul (Ottoman Frigate)

Hi Axeman,

thanks for putting such nice information in the article about the Frigate Ertugrul. I am one of the team members working in the actual excavation project of the shipwreck and I wanted to ask you about the information you have gathered about the accident. I do not seem to have the original sources for the description in English and I would really appreciate if you let me know where to get them. I'll appreciate your help, buyberta@tezek.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bertalledo (talk • contribs) 10:27, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NVI F.K.31

You added a contradict box to the NVI F.K.31 article. Could you point out what is contradictory there? --MoRsE (talk) 06:10, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NYer

I've been a subscriber for years too and remember many controversial covers . . . . though the only one that jumped to mind was the gay sailors kissing. I know there have been others.

I don't know that any have ever been this controversial and time will tell how big of a cover this really is.--Utahredrock (talk) 08:18, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

your edit on Orissa violence

I reverted [this edit] as you had wiped out the ref tag. I am sure it was accidental. Just wanted to mention that. :) Thanks. Recordfreenow (talk) 03:14, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, it was indeed accidental. Thanks for letting me know! Axeman89 (talk)

Merry Christmas

A Nobody^{My talk} is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

--A Nobody^{My talk} 02:54, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last stand

Please see Talk:Last stand#Examplefarm --PBS (talk) 16:46, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fast edits

I use a program called Huggle to remove vandalism quickly. When an account vandalizes after receiving a Level 4 warning, Huggle automatically reports the account to WP:AIV. You need rollback privileges to use it. It's really handy for blatant vandalism. --NellieBly (talk) 08:11, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I assumed you were using a program, but that you were manually making the changes yourself. Axeman89 (talk) 08:14, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, but I do choose which edits to revert, and blatant vandalism is usually pretty obvious so it can be reverted immediately. --NellieBly (talk) 08:32, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 04:57, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vz. 58

Hi. Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Vz. 58. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the articles. Thank you. ROG5728 (talk) 22:41, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Source added, right next to the picture of the Slovak soldier holding an Vz. 58 while standing beneath the Slovakian seal. Axeman89 (talk) 23:52, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NVI F.K.31

Hi, I see you put a contradict flag on the NVI F.K.31 article. I can't see any contradictions in it, so I have removed the tag. If I've missed the contradiction, please feel free to put the tag back, and leave a note on the talk page to expalin what the contradiction is. Cheers -- WORM MЯOW 12:05, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the edit. I have no idea why I put in the contradiction tag, especially since I don't seem to have mentioned it on the talk page. Perhaps I found it peculiar that the tiny, poor Finnish Air Force of the 1920s would purchase and fly 12 planes for a mere 6 total hours? Axeman89 (talk) 21:35, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

I've noticed that you don't use edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 05:16, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

HMS Petard

Hi Axeman89
I see that on going through the edit history for the Petard article, on 13 March at 0639, in "the Far East part two" section, para 1, you changed 'machine' to 'airplane'.
I originally put 'machine' in as a neutral adjective (as per the MoS); it would also be in keeping with the period. 'Airplane' is, I believe, American English, but to have 'areoplane' (British English) in the same line as 'aircraft' is no better as it would not be very good writing, (and as it now is with 'airplane').
In addition, 'airplane' did not seem right in an article about a RN ship. If the article was about a USS, it would be a different matter.

Regards

RASAM (talk) 13:58, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Longyearbyen

I believe that this was a typo. I've reverted it, since it's not clear what your intent was. Regards, Orange Suede Sofa (talk) 05:58, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's partially a typo. Referring to “the WWII conflicts” seemed a bit redundant, so I removed that part, but seem to have also accidentally removed the word “from.” If you agree with my change, you can make it, but with the word “from,” included this time, otherwise feel free to leave it alone. I'll leave the change to you. Axeman89 (talk) 15:55, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That makes sense. I've now made the adjustment. Regards, Orange Suede Sofa (talk) 17:41, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Synagogues of Gibraltar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Leghorn (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited RFB Fantrainer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page F4 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ludvig Puusepp, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ventriculography (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Cocos Islands Mutiny may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

and to signal the Japanese on [[Christmas Island]], which the Japanese had occupied on 3 March 1942).<ref>{{cite web|first=Klemen|last=L |url= http://www.dutcheastindies.webs.com/christmas.html |

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:51, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Outgassing may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

temperature vulcanization|RTV]] sealants outgas the poison [[cyanide]] for weeks after application.{{Citation needed|reason=this is a strong claim which can't be included here without proper

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:54, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Barotrauma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rockfish. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Joseph Bailey (general), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wisconsin Dells. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of Lisbon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Norman. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:30, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment: Hyazinth Graf Strachwitz

Hi, a community good article reassessment has been started for the article on Hyazinth Graf Strachwitz, which you edited. The reassessment page can be found here, if you would like to comment on whether the article still meets the GA criteria, or to provide suggestions about how it could be improved so that it can retain its GA status. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:47, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Knock, Ireland listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Knock, Ireland. Since you had some involvement with the Knock, Ireland redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. SST flyer 15:24, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Axeman89. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orsini affair

You are an accomplished editor, so perhaps I am missing something related to your recent edit of this article. I found the text here, which may suggest it came from a source now in public domain, but I don't see that you used quotes or a blockquote or identified the source.S Philbrick (Talk) 12:12, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads-up. I was just copying this section, although I apparently didn't bother to seek out its source. It just seems strange that the one thing missing from the Orisini Affair article is the assassination at the center--the article simply goes from background to the arrest, with no description of the act itself. Axeman89 (talk) 12:14, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Axeman89. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Reinickendorfer Straße (Berlin U-Bahn), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Borsigwerke (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:14, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Axeman89. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Axeman89. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Canton of Schaffhausen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Canton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nikolai Vasilevich Novikov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Molotov (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Armenia/Azerbaijan discretionary sanctions

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Cabayi (talk) 15:40, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eleonore Prochaska, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dannenberg.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Bailén, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cabrera.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bracteate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited George Kennan (explorer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Koryak.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Contentious topics notification

You have recently made edits related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. This is a standard message to inform you that post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Contentious topics are the successor to the former discretionary sanctions system, which you may be aware of. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. For a summary of difference between the former and new system, see WP:CTVSDS. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 19:40, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]