User talk:Awsecom

Welcome!

Hello, Awsecom, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Dj Ilji, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ... discospinster _talk 02:44, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dj Ilji

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dj Ilji requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ ILJANO (2nd nomination). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ... discospinster _talk 02:44, 30 October 2019 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Awsecom (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #27394 was submitted on Oct 30, 2019 16:53:49. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 16:53, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Awsecom (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi administrator... i can not understand why you are blocking me ... till now i just worked and published on wikipedia about dj ilji which has been removed ....and about amin mehraein i saw the deletion discussion then i searched about him on the social medias and google and just voted about him to keep his article because the his verified social medias and i think he is notable...should't i contribute on the discussions ? however with this actions from you admins if any person really is famous and notable another users couldn't publish or contribute on the Wikipedia about him .....please unblock me...thanks Awsecom (talk) 20:57, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You're blocked for sock puppetry. In your next unblock request, you should address this reason. PhilKnight (talk) 23:13, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@PhilKnight: what should i do now to be unblock? Awsecom (talk) 10:09, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Make another unblock request that addresses the sock puppetry. PhilKnight (talk) 20:57, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Awsecom (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello administrator. the reason of my account block is sock puppetry however i don't believe this detection of my blocking reason.... what can i do for unblocking ? what should i do? Awsecom (talk) 20:13, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Behavioural and/or technical evidence strongly suggests that this account is a sockpuppet. Simple denial is not considered a sufficient reason to unblock the account. In order to be unblocked, you will need to convince the reviewing administrator that there is a better explanation for this apparent connection than the abuse of multiple accounts. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:39, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Dj Iljano

@Oshwah: Hi dear sir ... i've leaved message on you talk page for two times but some administrator tries to retrieve my message to you and blocked me but i don't know why. However i wanted to request help from you about two titles 1: may you please check the article that published on my sandbox and tell me your idea about this article? i check this musician social medias and understood that he verified from every social medias ( YouTube , Instagram , Google knowledge , Spotify ) and also interviews on the Albanian TVs... i Published this once on the wikipedia DJ Ilji but removed cause the fake interviews and resources : Wikipedia:Articles for deletion . What's the problem with contents ? what is the solution ? 2: i'll say it after number 1 answer

thanks dear sir Awsecom (talk) 10:05, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Awsecom - Your account has been checkuser blocked. This means that you need to appeal your block to the Arbitration Committee; no administrator will be able to review and unblock you through the usual channels. See the "other methods of appeal" section on this section of the "appealing a block" guideline page for instructions. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:58, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]