User talk:Awojdyla

Ways to improve Fourier ptychography

Hi, I'm Airplane Maniac. Awojdyla, thanks for creating Fourier ptychography!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Its a little to technical, and needs some reorganization, but its off to a great start!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. --AM (Talk to me!) 00:14, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yves Petroff moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Yves Petroff, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Xain36 {talk} 18:19, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Yves Petroff has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Yves Petroff. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:24, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yves Petroff

Hi Awojdyla, Yves Petroff is clearly a notable scientist, as director of several national synchrotron radiation user facilities, and clearly passes the relevant wikipedia notability guidelines for scientists at WP:NPROF. As such I have moved your draft back to mainspace without further delay and done a little bit of cleanup. Best wishes Polyamorph (talk) 19:48, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Awojdyla (talk) 20:44, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Awojdyla. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Polyamorph (talk) 20:07, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Hope Ishii

Hello, Awojdyla,

Thank you for creating Hope Ishii.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

References written by independent people are required to show notability. Reviews of the subject's work would count.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Graeme Bartlett}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:33, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel L. Menichella moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Daniel L. Menichella, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 06:51, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank for your review. We can add source later, there are dozens published on the topic (because of covid-19.) This page is a translation from the German page and already has more references than the source. Why should we keep it as a draft? (I have limited bandwidth to edit pages.) Awojdyla (talk) 08:31, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel L. Menichella moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Daniel L. Menichella, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Sulfurboy (talk) 07:14, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel L. Menichella (March 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daniel L. Menichella and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Daniel L. Menichella, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 07:15, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Awojdyla! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 07:15, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel L. Menichella (April 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by QueerEcofeminist was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daniel L. Menichella and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Daniel L. Menichella, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

QueerEcofeminist^{"cite! even if you fight"!!!} [they/them/their] 09:41, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

James B Murphy moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, James B Murphy, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 05:58, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Elaine DiMasi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elaine DiMasi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elaine DiMasi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eostrix (talk) 08:06, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of LAAAMP

A tag has been placed on LAAAMP requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DannyS712 (talk) 17:42, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Centre for Nanosciences and Nanotechnologies moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Centre for Nanosciences and Nanotechnologies, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:01, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I found some RS about C2N,[1][2][3][4] so we can try to get the draft ready for mainspace. Unfortunately, the fr-wiki article has few sources also. HouseOfChange (talk) 22:33, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Daniel L. Menichella

Hello, Awojdyla. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Daniel L. Menichella".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 10:46, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:James B Murphy

Hello, Awojdyla. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "James B Murphy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:08, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:LAAAMP

Hello, Awojdyla. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "LAAAMP".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:17, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stefanie Tompkins moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Stefanie Tompkins, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more information and citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) ). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. or let me know on my user talk page for an immmediater eview, because the position is very important and we should have an article DGG ( talk ) 00:03, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I improved the article and am asking DGG to approve it before trying instead just to submit for review. HouseOfChange (talk) 20:39, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@HouseOfChange: Thanks for the upgrades -- I had collected lots of references, but I lost the content before I could save it. This is totally great Awojdyla (talk) 21:15, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Stefanie Tompkins

On 19 May 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Stefanie Tompkins, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Stefanie Tompkins. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Stefanie Tompkins), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Galileo Violini

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Galileo Violini, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:27, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Galileo Violini

Hello, Awojdyla,

Thank you for creating Galileo Violini.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please ensure that everything has sources, particularly his awards.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Ldm1954 (talk) 09:40, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Hi Awojdyla! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 22:39, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]