User talk:Awesomeme111

Abhirup.roy1983, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Abhirup.roy1983! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:15, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Kaal Madhumas - (film).
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Pratyya ^{(have a chat?)} 05:25, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Answering your e-mail (Pratyya Ghosh)

It's that there was another article named Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Kaal Madhumas and that was empty. this article is all right. I'll try to review it. Cheers and Happy editing.--Pratyya ^{(have a chat?)} 14:00, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Kaal Madhumas - (film).
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 11:30, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Kaal Madhumas - (film).
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Alexrexpvt (talk) 16:25, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kaal Madhumas

Hi you have just declined my article on the above subject stating its a blank document. However if you see the link : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_creation/Kaal_Madhumas_-_(film) (My Project Page), it does have an article included. I am not sure how to submit this properly. This is my first article and therefore apologies for the added problem. Abhirup.roy1983 (talk) 11:50, 27 December 2012 (UTC) Abhirup[reply]

Ah, that explains a thing or two. Normally AFC pages are developed on the talk page instead of being developed on the project page (which is somewhat counterintuitive now that i think about it). Since the review tag was placed on the talk page, and since that page contained a references section it looked as if that page was intended for review.

To be frank it doesn't matter where the content is placed - just place the review request template on the page that is intended for review. I see that you already did that though, and i see Alexrexpvt had now reviewed the project page itself. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 20:05, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Kaal Madhumas - (film).
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Bonkers The Clown (Nonsensical Babble) 06:38, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Kaal Madhumas - (film).
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Bonkers The Clown (Nonsensical Babble) 10:51, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

Hello Abhirup.roy1983, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied without attribution. If you want to copy from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. (The "Plot" section was the particular issue here. It's best to write these based on your own viewing of the movie, completely in your own words - not using what's on the movie's website.) --Demiurge1000 (talk) 18:43, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Prabir Roy.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Basket _Feudalist 13:59, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Kaal Madhumas - (film).
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Schenka (talk) 06:19, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Kaal Madhumas - (film).
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Wylie pedia 10:50, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove the decline boxes from AfC articles. These do not hurt the article in any way and give AfC reviewers a quick histroy on past submissions. Thanks! — Wylie pedia 03:26, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Awesomeme111. You have new messages at CAWylie's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Kaal Madhumas - (film).
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! —Anne Delong (talk) 12:40, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fame Fashion and Creative Excellence (FFACE)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Fame Fashion and Creative Excellence (FFACE), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 21:30, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Indroneel Mukherjee (IM)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Indroneel Mukherjee (IM), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. TheLongTone (talk) 12:12, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Indroneel Mukherjee (IM)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Indroneel Mukherjee (IM), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. GILO A&E⇑ 09:09, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Indroneel Mukherjee (IM), a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. GILO A&E⇑ 09:37, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indroneel Mukherjee (IM)

Hi Gilo,

Yes just noted that. Sorry for the mess up. However I have also put my comments on the Talk Page to contest the deletion. Wanted to know if any part of the article needs amendment. Happy to do that.

awesomeme111 09:44, 23 March 2014 (UTC) Awesome111

Nomination of Fame Fashion and Creative Excellence (FFACE) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fame Fashion and Creative Excellence (FFACE) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fame Fashion and Creative Excellence (FFACE) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shrikanthv (talk) 09:06, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:FFACE Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FFACE Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:43, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Promo Usho.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Promo Usho.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:18, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Fame Fashion and Creative Excellence.png

Thanks for uploading File:Fame Fashion and Creative Excellence.png, which you've attributed to yourself. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mlpearc (open channel) 23:06, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Indroneel Mukherjee (Fashion Designer)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Draft:Indroneel Mukherjee (Fashion Designer), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.wikigrain.org/?req=Indroneel+Mukherjee.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 10:09, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indroneel Mukherjee (Fashion Designer)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Indroneel Mukherjee (Fashion Designer), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.fface.in/core-co/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 10:47, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Indroneel Mukherjee (Fashion Designer)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Indroneel Mukherjee (Fashion Designer), but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://indroneelmukherjee.com/about.html http://www.fface.in/core-co/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Indroneel Mukherjee (Fashion Designer) and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Indroneel Mukherjee (Fashion Designer), in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Indroneel Mukherjee (Fashion Designer) with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Indroneel Mukherjee (Fashion Designer). See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Indroneel Mukherjee (Fashion Designer) saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 00:52, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Indroneel Mukherjee (Fashion Designer)

Hello, Awesomeme111,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Indroneel Mukherjee (Fashion Designer) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indroneel Mukherjee (Fashion Designer) .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Wgolf (talk) 20:21, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fame Fashion and Creative Excellence (FFACE)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Fame Fashion and Creative Excellence (FFACE), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Mabalu (talk) 09:14, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fame Fashion and Creative Excellence (FFACE) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fame Fashion and Creative Excellence (FFACE) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fame Fashion and Creative Excellence (FFACE) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mabalu (talk) 10:08, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:50, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fame Fashion and Creative Excellence.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fame Fashion and Creative Excellence.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:48, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fame Fashion and Creative Excellence

Hello Awesomeme111,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Fame Fashion and Creative Excellence for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. —Swpb^talk 04:42, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You wrote "However should you consider that few aspects of the write up looks like promotion or advertisement, am happy to edit and rewrite those parts. You can edit as necessary or remove the aspects which violates the encyclopaedia criteria." It is not the task of other contributors to fix the article for you. You have access to the guidelines. If you are not sure how to write the article without departing from the guidelines, you can use Wikipedia:Articles for creation to get a second opinion. Deb (talk) 11:07, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of PeeSafe

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on PeeSafe, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Daiyusha (talk) 17:01, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Hello Awesomeme111. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Awesomeme111. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Awesomeme111|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Daiyusha (talk) 17:01, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Daiyusha: Thank you for your message. There has been no commercial agreement for this article. The brand is extremely popular and qualifies for a Wiki Article. All relevant sources from notable media was included. The article is a consumer product similar to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysol Please request you to undo the delete of the page and restore the same. If any part seems promotional, happy to amend.

awesomeme111 19:13, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Blocked

Despite the massive number of warnings you have received for creating inappropriate articles which were promotional and/or violated copyright, you have once again created an inappropriate promotional article. This is disruptive and wasteful of other editors' time. As you seem to have no intent of stopping this practice, I have indefinitely blocked you from editing. If you believe that this block was made in error, please review the guide to appealing blocks. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 18:16, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Awesomeme111 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

There has no constructive reason for this block. Articles which were contested was 5 years back and early days of my Wikipedia editorship. Nothing was contested in last 5 years apart from the latest article which was nominated for a speedy deletion on "PeeSafe" If a photo used in any of my article was contested for copyright issue, the same was responded to and proper justification provided ensuring all policies followed. I consider that the block is in fact not necessary to prevent damage or disruption as I respect and understand the Wikipedia policy and will ensure no articles are created as promotional or violate copyright in future.

Decline reason:

Until you are prepared to abide by Wikipedia's Terms of Use regarding paid editing and our local policies regarding promotion, I see no reason to unblock you. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:19, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

awesomeme111 19:02, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

While that was some time ago, did you think that something had changed in the intervening time that we now allow promotional content, when we didn't before? Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 19:55, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Awesomeme111 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am more than happy and confirm to abide by Wikipedia's Terms of Use regarding paid editing and any local policy. In this specific article I also confirm to have no commercials involved and therefore nothing to declare. I do note that this article PeeSafe was previously deleted when created by other users in 2016 -2017 for promotional content. I confirm to edit any future articles from more neutral perspective providing more credible sources as reference. Request an unblock of my user id and IP as it is my first request for appeal against any block since this userid was created in 2012. Thank you. awesomeme111 05:43, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This does not address your copyright violations; you will need to explain that you understand what copyright is and that you understand WP:COPYVIO. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 10:28, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Awesomeme111 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I confirm to abide by the copyright violations. However, till date there has been no copyright violations for any articles, but has been flagged up for media copyright issues. All such claims were substantiated and later approved. I further confirm I will be more careful and follow the policy carefully in future as confirmed on WP:COPYVIO.

Decline reason:

It is clear you are not looking to improve the project. Either that, or you don't have the competence to edit here. There are multiple articles you created that were removed due to copyright violations. I do not see a reason to unblock at this time. RickinBaltimore (talk) 11:40, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

"However, till date there has been no copyright violations for any articles, but has been flagged up for media copyright issues" I can't tell if you are being serious here. You've had multiple articles deleted for copyright violations. There's literally discussion about these concerns right here on your talk page. You've had more than 150 edits deleted, generally (though admittedly not exclusively) for violating copyright. This appears to be a deliberate attempt to mislead us. Combined with your multiple violations of paid editing and given these issues have been happening for years, I strongly oppose any unblock here. But note, I previously declined an unblock request from this editor. --Yamla (talk) 11:07, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Awesomeme111 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

In my last 3 appeals in last 3 days, I have asked to confirm that I abide by Wikipedia policies and abide by Copyright policies. I have since then confirmed that I will ensure there are no lapses in any further edits. All the contributions talked about now, are historic and minimum 4 years back during my early days as an editor. I feel its unfair to block me for something which was historic and rectified. The recent was regarding violation of G11, but am happy to rewrite the same. There are enough credible sources to confirm the article. Request you to look at this unblock request neutrally and consider for an opportunity.

Decline reason:

Wikipedia is not a free platform for you to post advertisements. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:03, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Misleading information

While I refrain from any argument and debate on this platform but you state “You've had multiple articles deleted for copyright violations. This appears to be a deliberate attempt to mislead us. Combined with your multiple violations of paid editing and given these issues have been happening for years, I strongly oppose any unblock here. But note, I previously declined an unblock request from this editor.” Would you possibly be kind enough to point out any article stated on my Talk Page which says been deleted for copyright violations? I have been honest with my view points and reasoning always and continue to be the same. You also state you you have declined and unblock request from me? This is the first time where a block has happened for me and you have never put in any remark or comments ever apart from this one on my Talk Page. This completely a miss leading information. awesomeme111 11:46, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

"Copyright" currently appears on your talk page 49 times (though this obviously does not represent 49 separate copyright violations). Kaal Madhumas - (film) was deleted for copyright infringement. Indroneel Mukherjee (Fashion Designer) was deleted for copyright infringement. Indroneel Mukherjee (Fashion Designer) had copyright infringement violations, though was deleted because the person was not notable. Looking at images you've uploaded (only here on en.wiki; you have a number of deleted images over on commons, too), we can see File:Kaal Madhumas Poster.jpg, File:FFACE Logo.png, File:Promo Usho.jpg, and File:Fame Fashion and Creative Excellence.png. Note that images are more complicated; images have to be deleted for copyright reasons if they are fair-use but unused. That's not always the case here, but may be the case with some of the uploads. --Yamla (talk) 11:54, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

So thats the point, there has been nothing in last 3-4 years. The ones stated by you above were initial days of Wikipedia editing and were all other AFC which was reviewed by some administrator before it goes LIVE. The images spoken about were all justified later and retained once initially flagged up for copyright. Once proper authentication provided, the same was accepted and is still retained under commons. Finally you stated, about your oppose on Block. When did that happen? awesomeme111 12:05, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Every single one of those images I referenced were deleted, none of them were kept. It is true that the articles deleted for copyright violation were deleted several years ago, as you say. However, the following claim is false: "there has been no copyright violations for any articles". I thought I had declined one of your unblock requests; I believe you are asking about that. I have indeed not declined any of your unblock requests. My mistake, sorry. --Yamla (talk) 12:40, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I do not mean to be persuasive but just wanted to be extremely clear myself before I make my another request for unblock. I am failing to understand all the articles you mentioned above, between 2013-2014 were speedily deleted for reasons A1, G11 and G4 with the exception of Indroneel Mukherjee where a bit of context of the article was driven from his personal website. The article was again never completed since it was confirmed to be not worthy.

In respect to the images, all the images were initially deleted for copyright claims but now restored and still shows available under the commoms library under my username. Again except Indroneel Mukherjee since his article was never completed, image PromoUsho.jpg was not required to be restored.

In last 5 years there has been many edits which was never highlighted and completely consider this action to be punitive for something where examples are drawn from articles created 5 years back. awesomeme111 13:41, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Anneysha Thakker

Hello, Awesomeme111. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Anneysha Thakker".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! TheImaCow (talk) 09:19, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]