User talk:Avvaik92/sandbox

Peer Review for Avvai!

Hi Avvai, I loved reading your new section, it will be a great addition to the woodcut page!

Here are a few quick edits: -“Figures that are prominent” instead of is prominent. -"The tools for woodcut are easily attainable", add the word are

Lastly maybe consider adding in some subheadings within your section to help readers scan the information. A present day subhead would be helpful for your last paragraph for example. JazminWel (talk) 03:40, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review for Avvai

(This is from Moorea but it was on my main user page instead of this particular sandbox so I just copied it over here so the feedback can be in one place!- Avvai)

Hi Avvai! This was a really fascinating read and a good addition to the wikipedia page on woodcuts. I only have a couple of comments.

Perhaps consider getting rid of the adjective "famous" before Fernando Leal, just for the sake of keeping your neutral tone consistent.

You might also consider having a source for the section in which you talk about illiteracy rates pre- and post-Revolution, just in case someone is interested and to back up your statement.

I do agree with Jaz about adding some subheadings to differentiate the modern from the historical just to make things a bit clearer inside the section. RaeCorrigan23 (talk) 00:51, 5 April 2019 (UTC)RaeCorrigan23 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Avvaik92 (talk • contribs)