User talk:Avoman

Welcome!

Hello, Avoman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 19:46, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Sebastian roché.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Sebastian roché.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 19:46, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Sebastian roché.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Sebastian roché.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 19:46, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Sebastian roché.jpeg

A tag has been placed on File:Sebastian roché.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 21:41, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The source is me Sebastian Roché, actually correcting the errors in my own biography about ME. If that’s not a good source I don’t know what is Avoman (talk) 07:34, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And please stop saying I’m a French actor I am Scottish and French, therefore Scottish French. I haven’t lived in France since 1992 Avoman (talk) 07:36, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Sebastian roché.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Sebastian roché.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 21:42, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Hello, I'm JDDJS. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. JDDJS (talk to me • see what I've done) 09:34, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. JDDJS (talk to me • see what I've done) 02:15, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article. JDDJS (talk to me • see what I've done) 23:54, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Avoman. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Sebastian Roché, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. You are holding yourself out as the subject of the article. It is a bad idea to edit an article written about yourself. See WP:AUTOPROB for guidance on how to address issues with the article. —C.Fred (talk) 00:01, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reiterating what you were told last year

You may not remove material sourced to secondary sources to replace it with your own claims. I suggest that you refrain from editing the Sebastian Roché article. If necessary, you will be blocked from editing that article to prevent disruption.

If you are Roché, as you claim, you really should not edit the article at all; you should request any edits at the talk page and let independent editors make the changes. —C.Fred (talk) 23:04, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

About redacting your date of birth: your day of birth is cited to a statement you made on the internet. In some cases, we generalize the date of birth to just the year, but since you've provided the exact date, there's no reason to do that. Age/date of birth is relevant in biographical articles, provided it's reliably sourced. The dob appears to be sourced; I need to do a little archive searching to verify it. —C.Fred (talk) 23:29, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked from the article Sebastian Roché

Hello. Due to a failure to comply with our conflict of interest policy and other issues including:

Replacing sourced content with original research
Removing publicly sourced information
Repeatedly adding unsourced information
and displaying ownership of the article

I have blocked you from editing the article Sebastian Roché indefinitely. Typically it is best for articles not to be edited by people who are close to the subject, or are the subject themselves. It can sometimes be done if the user carefully adheres to our conflict of interest policy, however you have not done this.

This block can be lifted by any administrator if they are convinced that you understand the issues at hand and are willing and able to remedy them.

You still have access to the article talk page and you can bring up concerns there. Please note that being the subject of the article does not give you any special authority over it and changes you suggest will need to be backed up by independent reliable sources.

If you wish to contest this block you may do so using the unblock template like so: {{unblock | reason=your reason here ~~~~}}

HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 00:05, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there,

I would like to be unblocked from editing my page as it is full of factual errors about me and my career. I would also like to add that I have dual nationality and would like it to be added on my page. I have been a British passport holder all my life. I have a question. How is it not best for the subject to edit his own page when administrators are doggedly keep making mistakes about my page. There is a bullying aspect to wikipedia that is very worrisome in my opinion. I have been trying to change the horrendous photo on my page for years. Let people who have the true info edit their own page not some administrators who play a guessing game about my origins and seemingly don't seem to have the correct information. I am not a French actor only, I haven't resided there for more than 30 years, I was a dual national when i resided there, worked in England, moved to the US and am now an American citizen.

Thank you for your understanding

Best

Sebastian Roché Avoman (talk) 01:00, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]