User talk:Averyfunkydude23

Welcome!

Hello, Averyfunkydude23!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Sign your messages with four tildes (~~~~), be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, wizzito | say hello! 00:02, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Paramount Global Content Licensing

Just a heads up that as part of the WP:BRD (Bold, Revert, Discuss process), I have started a move discussion on the article's talk page. I'm doing this as an example for both you and AdhiOK to see how such discussion to determine consensus can take place in a productive way without edit warring. Singularity42 (talk) 21:36, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. Thank you Averyfunkydude23 (talk) 19:22, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paramount Music, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Andrews. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: The Cowabunga Collection moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: The Cowabunga Collection, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 08:06, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles 2023 film logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles 2023 film logo.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:30, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request move on Commons

Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles 2023 film logo.png was copied to Wikimedia Commons by Salavat. The local copy will soon be deleted in favor of the Commons copy which is available to all Wikimedia projects. Please request your rename there. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 14:12, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Point Grey Pictures logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Point Grey Pictures logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 16:37, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:South Park The Streaming Wars poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:South Park The Streaming Wars poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:02, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: The Cowabunga Collection has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: The Cowabunga Collection. Thanks! ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 17:48, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Hello, I'm MSA09. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Untitled Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles film, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. MSA09 (talk) 12:42, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: The Cowabunga Collection has been accepted

Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: The Cowabunga Collection, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

OceanHok (talk) 18:41, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022 edit warring

Your recent editing history at Untitled Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles film shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. CreecregofLife (talk) 02:33, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 04:56, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Averyfunkydude23 (talk) 14:52, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Players 2022 title card.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Players 2022 title card.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 19:58, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Averyfunkydude23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Averyfunkydude23 (talk) 20:32, 16 July 2022 (UTC) I keep getting blocked, even though I am not the only one who is making edits for Untitled Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles film without discussing with anyone. I'm just trying to keep the page accurate to the sources we have recieved, but certain editors (User:NoobMiester96 and User:ZX2006XZ), particularly involved with animation pages keep adding unsourced information. No source has stated that Nickelodeon Movies is a production company on the film, so I do not know where that idea came from.[reply]

Decline reason:

See WP:NOTTHEM. 331dot (talk) 20:53, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Untitled Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles film (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

@Averyfunkydude23: You must stop edit warring regardless of whether you are correct or not. Instead, you must post on the article talk page and calmly describe your concern and proposed edit, then wait for responses. Questions can be asked at WP:Teahouse. Johnuniq (talk) 01:55, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Hello, I'm Bovineboy2008. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Mutant Mayhem, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. BOVINEBOY2008 20:16, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read every news article on the film since it's title was announced last week. I think those are pretty good sources Averyfunkydude23 (talk) 04:15, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Mutant Mayhem) for repeated edit-warring.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 19:30, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Averyfunkydude23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Averyfunkydude23 (talk) 05:41, 18 August 2022 (UTC) I edit warred, and that was definetly wrong of me. But I have tried discussing with the editors on that page like, Noobmeister, through edit summaries or on their talk pages. I have even tried starting a disussion in the talk page on this article but they never want to communicate. The most recent edit of mine that kept being undone was me listing the film as 'American', and I explained that it was cause Point Grey is actually an american production company, and not canadian like it was previously believed. I even edited the Point Grey Pictures's page to reflect that, but they just undid it and I don't know why. But I I wasn't really making ay progress with how I tried to deal with the situation, so I understand my block. Could you at least please help solve this matter becuase it's been like this for months.[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:54, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

auto unblock

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Averyfunkydude23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

... (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Block message:

original block message

Blocking administrator: not provided (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You forgot to fill in the fields. Yamla (talk) 13:22, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

second unblock attempt

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Averyfunkydude23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Averyfunkydude23 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Block message:

My ip has been auto blocked, but I am honestly not sure why because I don't think I have done anything wrong. My best guess is because I alternate between my home wifi and an internet device I use for my college work. Can I please have the block lifted? And If there is something else wrong I have done please tell me

Blocking administrator: blocking admin (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: That IP is that of your home network, and not the one you use to connect to the internet. You may use a tool like whatismyip dot com to determine your IP if it does not appear in the block message. 331dot (talk) 15:33, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

third unblock attempt

This user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Averyfunkydude23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

41.77.88.10 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

My ip has been auto blocked, but I am honestly not sure why because I don't think I have done anything wrong. My best guess is because I alternate between my home wifi and an internet device I use for my college work. Can I please have the block lifted? And If there is something else wrong I have done please tell me

Blocking administrator: not provided.

Accept reason: Block has expired. SilkTork (talk) 10:01, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That IP is that of a P2P VPN/proxy. If you are not knowingly using one, you may have picked one up if you use your device in different places. Try clearing your browser cache and waiting 24 hours. 331dot (talk) 07:13, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Mutant Mayhem

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Averyfunkydude23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand the reason why I was blocked from editing the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Mutant Mayhem page. I broke the 3RR rule, and was being disruptive and unproductive and I have no one to blame but myself. I can assure you that I will work better with other editors in the future.

Decline reason:

As this partial block has only recently been applied there has been little time to assess your behaviour on other articles. After a period of at least one month of productive and trouble free editing you may consider appealing again. SilkTork (talk) 10:07, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

another unblock attempt...

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Averyfunkydude23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

41.77.88.13 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

My IP adress keeps getting randomly blocked by Wikipedia and I am not sure why.

Blocking administrator: blocking admin (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: The IP address keeps getting blocked because it's a P2P VPN. However, more important is the fact that you have used IP editing to evade your partial block. See below. JBW (talk) 14:30, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

... and another block

As you know, on 1 October you used IP editing to edit the article from which you are blocked. I have therefore extended the partial block to a total block. You may post an unblock request if you think you are likely to persuade an administrator that you will abide by the indefinite partial block if it is restored. JBW (talk) 14:30, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Averyfunkydude23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I evaded my partial block. I don't have much to say because I am entirely in the wrong, but I do hope this block isn't permanent. I understand not restoring it now, but I hope eventually

Decline reason:

You have continued to evade your block. At this point, you need to show that you're trustworthy. Make 500+ edits on a different project over a period of 6 months. Build up a history of being able to follow simple rules. Then make an unblock request per the standard offer. At this point, it looks like you have contempt for our rules. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:17, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

question regarding block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Averyfunkydude23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked for evading a partial block on a specific Wikipedia page. And then I was then told that I should make 500+ edits on other projects to prove I am trustworthy. Cool, makes sense. But how am I supposed to do that if I am still blocked (without an expiration date). I still want to contribute to Wikipedia, despite my past bad behaviour. What am I supposed to do?

Accept reason:

You are lucky that I blocked you , because very few other administrators would have considered unblocking under the present circumstances. You have been totally blocked for several weeks, and I am willing to let it go at that, on the basis of your assurance that you won't evade the partial block again. However, be warned that if you are found to have evaded it again, you are likely to be fully blocked again, his time with far less likelihood of getting unblocked, so make sure you stick to what you have said you will do. JBW (talk) 22:14, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are only blocked on English Wikipedia. You can edit any or all other WMF projects - Wiktionary, Simple Wiki, Commons, other language versions of Wikipedia, etc. Your account here will work there. 199.208.172.35 (talk) 16:43, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. I can assure you that I won't do it again. Averyfunkydude23 (talk) 03:54, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Avatar Studios (November 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Avatar Studios and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 10:20, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Averyfunkydude23! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Devonian Wombat (talk) 10:20, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Original research

All of your edits involving Nickelodeon Movies have been reverted for introducing original research and removing known information. As you have been on the edge of a full block for months (and just came out of one), it's time to reconsider your priorities here and why you have an article block. Learn how to source, or find something else to do, because other editors are not here to clean up your errors full-time. Nate • (chatter) 17:06, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Teen Wolf- The Movie poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Teen Wolf- The Movie poster.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:30, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:John Wick Chapter 4 poster.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:John Wick Chapter 4 poster.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:59, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles,Mutant Mayhem logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles,Mutant Mayhem logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:41, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles,Mutant Mayhem logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles,Mutant Mayhem logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:51, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Point Grey Pictures.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Point Grey Pictures.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]