User talk:Avantguarde

Welcome

Hello, Avantguarde, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Don't be disheartened by Transhumanist Art being put up for AfD! LinaMishima 04:42, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Transhumanist Art

You stated on the AfD that you have more than 50 references, which means that the article should be savable from the AfD. Here are my thoughts about your options:

Allow the article to be deleted, stating that you will work on it in userspace, at User:Avantguarde\Transhumanist Art. This way you are seen as being civil, and you will be able to finish the article without any interferance. Once you are done with writing it, you can then move it back to article space.
Add all the references now, in a list at the bottom of the article. It's ugly, but it makes the point that the article needs work on the writing rather than sourcing.
Significantly rewrite the text. Currently, it is my opinion that the article reads appaulingly, which does not help people to find in favour of it. I suspect that the current paragraphs are extracts from a source.

Good luck with this! LinaMishima 04:42, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[Transhumanist Art]]

I only worked on the page for 5 minutes!! This is amazing. I had just started writing when someone came on and deleted my text and then put the article up for deletion. This unprofessional, rude and coersive.

I will work on the references today. The text is taken from an article and I was given permission to quote it. Isn't it ok to use text and put it in quotes and give credit to the author?

I like your suggestion of putting it in a space to work on. But how do I do this? Avantguarde 17:19, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Transhumanist Art

I am closing the AfD as a keep as a result of the additions that you've made, but ask that you do the following:

In-line citations per WP:CITE (Harvard referencing or footnotes, see Wikipedia:Citations quick reference
Clean-up the layout some more

Many thanks -- Samir धर्म 10:54, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Great suggestion, thank you. I will take make the necessary edits as appropriate to clean up the citations. Avantguarde 00:59, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Transhumanist art

The article Transhumanist art has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is entirely synthesis and original research

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David Gerard (talk) 00:09, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Transhumanist art for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Transhumanist art is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transhumanist art until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. David Gerard (talk) 17:15, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]