User talk:Autodesplanifica

This is Autodesplanifica's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Miguel A. Martínez (urban sociologist) (October 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Johannes Maximilian were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please remove the external links from the body; also cite proper sources (most of the draft's text is unferenced, and all sources cited were composed by the subject).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Miguel A. Martínez (urban sociologist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 20:32, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Miguel A. Martínez (urban sociologist) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Miguel A. Martínez (urban sociologist). Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 16:10, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Miguel A. Martínez (urban sociologist) (November 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Close but not quite enough independent, significant coverage.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Miguel A. Martínez (urban sociologist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 20:44, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Autodesplanifica! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 20:44, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Miguel A. Martínez has been accepted

Miguel A. Martínez, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 14:03, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Hi I am wondering if you are connected in any way to the only subject of your wikipedia editing (Miguel A. Martínez)? If so that's not necessarily a problem, but it should be declared following WP:DISCLOSE. I am also wondering why you deleted the BLP tag which requested more sources with this edit? Cheers, Mujinga (talk) 12:20, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not. But why have you deleted most of the content? This is a case of vandalism. Autodesplanifica (talk) 15:21, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, it isn't vandalism to delete uncited or poorly referenced additions. This is what the template which you deleted on 26 March was trying to tell you. It says in part "Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediatelyfrom the article". Mujinga (talk) 20:58, 21 April 2024 (UTC) Mujinga (talk) 20:57, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Mujinga (talk) 17:49, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I borrowed a couple of sentences from his personal webpage to complete the profile and asked him for a self-portrait. Links to Squatting in Spain wikipedia page are added. His work on this topic has been very influential in Spain, at least. Autodesplanifica (talk) 18:06, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have uploaded the "self-portrait" photo as your own work. Either it is, and you have a very clear conflict of interest, or it is not and you are in breach of the image copyright policy. Which is it? (I'd also be interested to know where you got all these unsourced details about his personal life) Melcous (talk) 21:41, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Photo deleted since I don't know how to attribute authorship (it's a selfie posted in Facebook by the author). Details are now referenced to his own webpage. Influence can be assessed, for example, through the multiple media interviews and public interventions mentioned in his cv (same webpage). Autodesplanifica (talk) 22:36, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A CV is not a reliable independent secondary source, which is what we are looking for here. On the image, can you clarify - you said you asked him for a self-portrait, then you said it was posted to Facebook by the author. Which is the case? (I note that it does not appear on his public facebook page, and a reverse image search does not find it anywhere else on the internet). If you do have a connection with the subject (or indeed, you are this person), it is far better to be upfront and disclose this now and then we can help you work within the WP:COI guidelines. Thank you Melcous (talk) 11:38, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok about the cv. On the image, both are true, I asked him and he suggested this https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10221175417643277&set=pb.1480341499.-2207520000&type=3 (leaving aside his colleague). As for the connection, I just like his work, which I find notable. Thanks! Autodesplanifica (talk) 13:37, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These explanations are not very believable. You say you "just like his work" and yet you have the ability contact him to ask him for an image? And your user name here is very similar to his X (twitter) handle. As I noted above, you are far better off being up front and disclosing your conflict of interest and following the guidelines to manage it, than pretending there is not one. Melcous (talk) 14:27, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]