Jump to content

User talk:AustinRedd007

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, AustinRedd007, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Idle Valley Nature Reserve. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! RhinosF1 (talk) 11:08, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

[edit]

I noticed that you reverted my edit to Titchwell Marsh, which is a Featured Article. If you make a change to a featured article, you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts. Sources that are not acceptable include press releases, YouTube, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, and websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance. Although you have added a source, a "latest sightings" blog is by definition inadequate as it will soon be out of date. I don't want to edit war on this, so if you can't find a better reference for what you have added, I suggest that I remove your text but update the rarities using the most recent British Birds annual rare birds reports. Any views? Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:22, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sulphur Clover (June 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:
more than one source is needed. A more technical source would help.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DGG ( talk ) 08:58, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, AustinRedd007! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 08:58, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sulphur Clover (June 14)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MrClog was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The sources mention "Trifolium ochroleucon" instead of "Trifolium ochroleucum". Are you talking about a different species than the sources? MrClog (talk) 19:04, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
MrClog (talk) 19:04, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Trifolium ochroleucon has been accepted

[edit]
Trifolium ochroleucon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MrClog (talk) 16:16, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Lindo (June 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 11:20, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sarcocornia perennis moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Sarcocornia perennis, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Please add reliable sources (not just a database to the article). Although this isn't a requirement per-se for articles, it certainly helps to determine their notability. Sam-2727 (talk) 14:19, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Sarcocornia perennis has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sarcocornia perennis. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:29, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sarcocornia perennis has been accepted

[edit]
Sarcocornia perennis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 17:32, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Holderness, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Water vole and Coltsfoot (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Lindo (July 21)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at David Lindo instead.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This draft and the article appear to be the same.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 14:09, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

London
added links pointing to Brown hare and Water vole
Besthorpe, Nottinghamshire
added a link pointing to Collingham
Katsoburi Managed Reserve
added a link pointing to Brown hare
Nottingham Trent University
added a link pointing to Brown hare
Red Moss, Greater Manchester
added a link pointing to Black darter
Retford
added a link pointing to Brown hare

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you rerate the article of Thymelaea hirsuta, please?

[edit]

AustinRedd007,

It is assessed as an stub-class article, but I reckon that it deserves a Start or a C Class.

Regards,

--Yolanda95 (talk) 10:26, 18 August 2020 (UTC)Yolanda95[reply]

Re-rated as start.

AustinRedd007 (talk) 13:52, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

South Stack

[edit]

I kept your precious image but not for the reasons you wanted (hahaha). 81.141.60.184 (talk) 10:28, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lough Ramor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Creeping bent.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:31, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources

[edit]

Thank you for attempting to add a source to the birth date for Claire Coffee . However your edit has been reverted. I'm not sure which of these apply as there wasn't a direct link to your source:

  1. Ancestry.com is WP:USERG and should not be used as a source
  2. The California Birth Index is considerd WP:BLPPRIMARY and should never be used as a source.

Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 19:58, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing this out to me. With WP:BLPPRIMARY could you tell me what kind of resources are best for finding birth dates for people, if not using census records etc. Thanks, AustinRedd007 (talk) 09:27, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Species names

[edit]

This is a convincing argument about why we should capitalise species names by a senior ecologist. Perhaps we should start doing the same? Paolo.oprandi (talk) 16:20, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nuthatch?

[edit]

What happened to the nuthatch in that edit? This is not a criticism or trying to catch you out or anything ... it's genuine curiosity! Cheers DBaK (talk) 17:43, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A fair comment, my fault for not explaining properly in the notes. I've been updating pages about places in Britain to reflect the fact that nuthatch in British English actually means Eurasian nuthatch. But in this case the statement is just false- the nuthatch has spread rapidly northwards and so the Peak District is no longer the most northerly region it can be found. 17:55, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Oh brilliant, how interesting! Thank you very much for the explanation and the link. Great bird too – watched them nest-building near us a year or two ago. Best wishes DBaK (talk) 18:01, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! AustinRedd007 (talk) 18:10, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cities of Austria

[edit]

Hi, your recent edit on Bad Vöslau was reverted as it is indeed a city and not a town. Austria has many cities that are not statutory cities, but still hold the rank and title of a city. For more reference, you can refer to W:de:Liste der Städte in Österreich for a listing of all cities in Austria. Raladic (talk) 02:36, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your comment. That’s an interesting one then, i changed it to town as in the first line of the article it doesn’t mention city but instead states it is a spa town. I know a lot of other places which are given the rank of Stadt in Austria are listed as towns and not cities as well, such as Oberpullendorf, Jennersdorf, Bleiburg and Wolfsberg, Carinthia, just to name a few. Should these all be changed? AustinRedd007 (talk) 05:08, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, if it's a Stadt by title in Austria, it should be city and not town.
The nuance is just often lost on the English Wikipedia (especially because we don't have that many editors from Austria that are very actively curating it).
In Austria, we refer to all of these as "die Stadt Klagenfurt" or "die Stadt Baden" or when they are rural and encompass a Municipality in addition to their city title, "die Stadtgemeinde Traiskirchen" (city-municipality) to signify that the principal of the Municipality holds city title and Gemeinde that it also administers over adjacent towns and villages. There are some smaller municipalities as well where the principal is just a town, which are "Ortsgemeinde".
So in short for Austria:
  • Stadt -> City
  • Ort -> Town
  • Dorf -> Village
  • Siedlung -> Settlement
Raladic (talk) 20:38, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AustinRedd007&oldid=1187223155"