User talk:AurumIsGold

Welcome!

Hello, AurumIsGold, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!--MollyPollyRolly (talk) 22:00, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AurumIsGold, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi AurumIsGold! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Blaze The Wolf (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Minerva Surgical, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc. has been accepted

Minerva Surgical, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc., which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:17, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1st Century in Science (July 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at History of science instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please read also Getting started guide and contributing to Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:1st Century in Science and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:1st Century in Science, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 16:43, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Donald Yeomans (July 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Calliopejen1 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Donald Yeomans and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Donald Yeomans, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:03, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Mojave Desert

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mojave Desert you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 22:40, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Mojave Desert

The article Mojave Desert you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Mojave Desert for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 23:21, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mojave Desert, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Soda Lake. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Cold core ring

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cold core ring you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ganesha811 -- Ganesha811 (talk) 16:21, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@AurumIsGold: are you still around? I noticed you haven't edited for a few months. Let me know - otherwise unfortunately the nomination will likely fail. Will wait a week from now for a response. Ganesha811 (talk) 16:00, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ganesha811 Yes, I am still around. I am happy to cooperate with you in the nomination. AurumIsGold (talk) 23:15, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Great! I'll finish my first run-through of the review and ping you. Ganesha811 (talk) 21:06, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@AurumIsGold:, I've completed my GA review, please take a look at the page here and let me know what you think. Ganesha811 (talk) 17:05, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Cold core ring

The article Cold core ring you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Cold core ring for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ganesha811 -- Ganesha811 (talk) 22:41, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Haiti Cultural Exchange

Hello, AurumIsGold. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Haiti Cultural Exchange, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:05, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Alien Enemy Act

Hello, AurumIsGold. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Alien Enemy Act, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:1st Century in Science

Hello, AurumIsGold. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:1st Century in Science, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Donald Yeomans

Hello, AurumIsGold. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Donald Yeomans, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Alien Enemy Act

Hello, AurumIsGold. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Alien Enemy Act".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:41, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Donald Yeomans

Hello, AurumIsGold. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Donald Yeomans".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:40, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:1st Century in Science

Hello, AurumIsGold. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "1st Century in Science".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:46, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]