User talk:Auralgo

Mass Additions of related sites

Adsense google_ad_client = pub-9620428602202188

Accounts

Auralgo (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · AbuseLog · what links to user page · count · COIBot · Spamcheck · user page logs · x-wiki · status · Edit filter search · Google · StopForumSpam)
68.53.73.39 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • RDNS • tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot)
68.208.43.9 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • RDNS • tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot)
98.193.198.83 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • RDNS • tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot)

Please stop. If you continue spamming Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.--Hu12 (talk) 15:02, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi All, I was sorry to see my small contributions characterized as "Spam." I certainly respect the principles of Wikipedia I have added only a few external links over a period of years, only place them on relevant pages and -- if deleted -- I never replace them. Most visitors spent considerable time on my site and expressed frequent satisfaction. I do not derive any significant revenue from any of these pages, and I believe my site contains an extensive and well-maintained body of information that is a positive contribution to this Wiki site. I respectfully request that some of these deletions be reviewed again. Thanks for your attention. Auralgo (talk) 19:11, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Roughly you've added your link to about 37 articles. External links policy on Advertising and conflicts of interest states You should avoid linking to a website that you own, maintain or represent, and in this case, its your site. Unfortunately your conflict of interest editing involves contributing to Wikipedia in order to promote birdminds.com. Such a conflict is strongly discouraged. Your contributions to wikipedia under Auralgo and IP's 68.53.73.39, 68.208.43.9, 98.193.198.83, consist entirely of adding external links and is considered WP:Spam. Please do not continue adding links to your own websites to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is NOT a "repository of links" or a "vehicle for advertising" and persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted. Any further spamming may result in your account and/or your IP address being blocked from editing Wikipedia. You're here to improve Wikipedia -- not just to promote birdminds.com right? --Hu12 (talk) 15:18, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hu12, I apologize for creating any issues, and I promise not to add any more links. In my feeble defense, I would like to say that I typically only added a link when I created a new page, with the philosophy that the links were small, plainly labeled, and in cases where they persisted, remained because the person maintaining the page felt they added useful content. Frankly, although I value my ability to participate in in Wikipedia, I am uncomfortable editing other people's prose and prefer to concentrate on my own sites where I have creative control. As you probably understand, my overall interest lies more in experimenting with the internet than in any plans for financial gain through Adsense, which is limited to a couple of bucks a month, and for me is just part of the fun of playing around with websites. Wikipedia is indeed an amazing resource and -- believe it or not -- I appreciate guys like yourself that police the process to keep it honest. Thanks for taking the time to explain it to me. Auralgo (talk) 14:59, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What you can do If you have a source to contribute (something from your site), first contribute some facts on the talk page of an article, then cite your link as a source. Then let other editors incorporate it into the article. This will be in keeping with the objective of Neutrality. When doing so, be aware of Canvassing as it relates to Source soliciting. Thanks for your replies--Hu12 (talk) 15:23, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Barry Coburn (September 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Barry Coburn and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 10:51, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Auralgo! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 10:51, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]