User talk:AudraNoble1990

Welcome!

Hello, AudraNoble1990, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! HiLo48 (talk) 07:59, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, AudraNoble1990. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 08:05, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zenna Hopson (September 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Notcharizard was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zenna Hopson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- NotCharizard ^🗨 11:45, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Notcharizardthank you so much for your review. This is the first time I have submitted an article so I am very new to this. I just wanted to check - if I am able to provide a wider range of reliable sources, is there a chance this page will be approved? Thank you so so much! AudraNoble1990 (talk) 07:32, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@AudraNoble1990 Only if they are reliable, indepth and non-primary sources. It's good to have at least three good quality sources, and it's definitely good to not have them all be from the same source (like five sources that are different articles but all by the same newspaper) but having lots of sources isn't as important as having good qaulity ones. -- NotCharizard ^🗨 08:02, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That is incredibly helpful, thank you so much!!! AudraNoble1990 (talk) 08:03, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AudraNoble1990! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -- NotCharizard ^🗨 11:45, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Zenna Hopson has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Zenna Hopson. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 07:35, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I am not employed by Hopson. I worked for her over ten years ago. She has no knowledge i am trying to create this page. I wanted to make it as I want to contribute to making pages about inspiring women (especially Jewish women and women from the global majority). Do you have any advice how I can make it clear I am not being paid to make this page please? AudraNoble1990 (talk) 08:44, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

paid editing

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:AudraNoble1990, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=AudraNoble1990|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 08:37, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not being paid. So I am not sure how to proceed?I don't know how I can prove this?? AudraNoble1990 (talk) 08:46, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I perhaps have a COI because I used to know her? But i am not being paid AudraNoble1990 (talk) 08:46, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zenna Hopson has been accepted

Zenna Hopson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tagishsimon (talk) 00:11, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]