User talk:Atropos235

Welcome!

Hello, Atropos235, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing.

Xiner (talk, email) 01:53, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Blackjack 2007.jpg)

I think that you are being a little overzealous here - maybe you should give me a few minutes before suddenly declaring something an orphaned image - as I was just in the process of editing the page on which I was going to place the image - I think that maybe you should at least wait for 24 hours before deciding something is an orphaned image Dan arndt 00:52, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, just ran across it and didn't notice. Atropos235 00:54, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

apology accepted - just don't bee so eager next time - give the user a chance first Dan arndt 00:58, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congradulations!!!

You are now recognized as a recipient of the Big Boss Award. Thank you for undoing the vandalism on my userpage. This is my way of showing thanks to dedicated wikipedians. Big Boss 0 02:32, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user has been recognized as a
Big Boss Award recipient.

w00t. :P Atropos235 21:25, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

your data

Here are examples of the kind of graphs I can make. Is this at all like what you want? On the left is a "clean" graph without grid lines on the body of the graph. On the right there are some grid lines. Which do you like? Please let me know if you have any other preferences and suggestions. I see values for pka on the spread sheet for lab 8. Can you explain where those values came from...did your software automatically estimate the location of the inflection points? For the final graphs, do you want the plots of the derivatives below the pH plots (as on the spread sheet for lab 7) or do you want the pH and derivative on one graph (as on the spread sheet for lab 8)? --JWSchmidt 05:00, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a version with two panels. I forgot to indicate that the lower panel is on a log scale. Please provide additional suggestions/corrections. --JWSchmidt 17:06, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The necessary coefficients are given in Savitzky, A.; Goloy, M. J. E. (1964). "Smoothing and Differentiation of Data by Simplified Least Squares Procedures" Anal. Chem. 36:1527–39; along with the formal derivation. Unfortunately, I don't currently have access to a copy of this article :( The procedure is very easy to put in place once you have an Excel file of the data points. Physchim62 (talk) 18:00, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The name sounds familiar, my univ. library might have a copy I can dig out. -- atropos235 ✄ (blah blah, my past) 18:04, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spring damper

Whoops. My bad. When I build up my tagging momentum, I sometimes miss image descriptions; I've re-tagged it as a 'diagram.' Thanks! MithrandirMageT 13:06, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mirages

Hi, Atropos235, You are right it is not an inferior mirage, but it is not a superior mirage either, yet it is a mirage. It is called mock mirage. If you are interested in mirages here's the best place to learn about them:Mirages. There are many more than just inferior and superior mirages. I do not do much writing, it's hard for me to write in English, yet I wanted to show different sunset mirages.By the way you removed really unique and very special pictures that show inferior mirage of the comet. I know only about 2 pictures in the World like that. You also removed the picture, which shows a mirage of sunspot. You've also removed the animanitation, for which great mirage specialist Andy Young has written the comment. Are you really sure you're interested in Astronomy? Yet, like I said I'm not going to fight for these pictures. So I guess you could do whatever you wish. --Mbz1 02:12, 8 June 2007 (UTC)Mbz1[reply]

The camera was not moving - the mirage was but whatever, like I said, you could do whatever you want. I'm not going to fight. I'm more interested in taking pictures than in fighting for their display. That matter is over. Regards--Mbz1 02:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)Mbz1[reply]

Unnatural logarithms

You may be interested in my recent entry in talk:natural logarithm. Regards... PaulTanenbaum 03:18, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Nondestructive testing has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. PseudoOne (talk) 01:46, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your vigilance against vandalism, but I believe you are mistaken in performing this revert. I was simply removing text inserted by a user who seemed to aimlessly click the buttons on the top of the edit box. -- atropos235 ✄ (blah blah, my past) 01:50, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah sorry, I just noticed the addition of profanity. Thanks for the info :). PseudoOne (talk) 01:53, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

George W. Bush approval rating graph

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/10/George_W_Bush_approval_ratings_with_events.svg

The circle for the September 11th attacks looks too far right. Think you could update it?

Why are the data points post 2005 omitted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Idontusenumbers (talk • contribs) 20:06, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quantization error picture

Writing for the French wikipedia, I edited your quanterr.png to set French captions; I felt it was better to have local editions of wikipedia share information rather than make up a new picture.

However: I have done the same kind of job for the (French wikipedia) :fr:Dither (audio) page, and for this picture, quite expectedly, for dithering to blur the shape of the quantization error waveform, the quantization error must be filtered to half the sampling frequency, which I did, assuming that 1 horizontal pixel = 1 sample, with a 8th order Butterworth filter, to be rather on the safe side of the matter.

Now, shouldn't the quantization error graph be filtered also? I made a graph on the same basis as yours to see. On the one hand, filtering somewhat blurs the difference at the transition points (vertical lines), so unfiltered difference might be a little easier to understand; on the other hand, rigorously, one really should filter out the parts over half the sampling frequency.

What's your opinion on the matter?

PolBr (talk) 13:16, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Strip Search (web series)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Strip Search (web series) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 01:58, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the speedy delete after adding in two reliable site that mentioned it. Remember, always go to Google news and search for something, to find references to it you can use in the article. There are also subject specific custom Google searches [1] Dream Focus 03:08, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dust 514

Hello you've also removed one of my edits at Dust 514. I had inserted the review of Gamespot for Dust 514 under the Reception section. Looks like you accidentally undid my edit too while undoing the edits of a previous user. Since you have removed it please take responsibility and reinsert my edits. KahnJohn27 (talk) 07:19, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The only edit I see is him reverting an IP address. Check the history. Someone else must've removed your bit. Dream Focus 09:30, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies

I've realized it wasn't you who removed my edit. In actual I never even made the edit. While inserting the GameSpot score I realized that Pressed Cancel instead of Save page. Since I wasn't looking at the screen I didn't come to know about it until recently and had thought my edit was saved. It was actually my fault. Sorry for that. KahnJohn27 (talk) 05:07, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

hello

hi from another GR wikipedian...I'm setting up a meetup on Sept 7 at 7 pm the Fuller Ave (and Michigan St., in the same building as the Subway) BIGBY COFFEE (365 Fuller Ave NE Ste B Grand Rapids, MI 49503, Grand Rapids, MI) if you are at all interested. Love to see you there! Bdcousineau (talk) 15:35, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Citation span

I love that tool! I haven't seen it before, but I'll use it myself going forward. Thanks for showing it to me. With sincere regards, Tenebrae (talk) 05:33, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Atropos235. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of named exoplanets has been accepted

List of named exoplanets, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gbawden (talk) 10:29, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Atropos235. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Atropos235. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Atropos235. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Custom signature fix needed

Hi there! You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.

The problem: Your signature contains a syntax error, specifically formatting tags that are in the wrong order.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
Remove anything in the Signature: text box.
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "Restore all default settings" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)

Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Change the signature as shown below, or make other edits to make the signature appear how you want it to appear.
Click Save to update to your newly fixed signature.

Current signature:
[very long signature not printed here]

Fixed signature:
-- [[User:Atropos235|atropos235]] <small>([[User talk:Atropos235|blah blah]], [[Special:Contributions/Atropos235|my past]])</small>

More information is available at Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing how everyone sees your signature. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. Thanks. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:22, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]