User talk:Atopouzian
Your submission at Articles for creation: Ara Topouzian (October 29)
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ara Topouzian and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello! Atopouzian,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Rankersbo (talk) 21:49, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
|
Draft:Ara Topouzian
[edit]I assume it was you who asked in #wikipedia-en-help about Draft:Ara Topouzian. That draft has a range of problems. While at a glance it looks well-sourced, some of those references are less than reliable. For example, Elon University lauding their own professor's work is not an independent source and likely not subject to meaningful editorial oversight. While PanArmenian.net looks like a news site, I couldn't find any information on authorship and no indication on what kind of editorial staff, if any, they have. TheArmenianWeekly has that information - but the author doesn't seem to have any education or experience in journalism, and the best I can find out about the editor is that she has a bachelor's degree in English. That's not really inspiring confidence. It may be better to focus on sources that clearly are reliable and to omit the more dubious ones. What I'd also get rid of is the lengthy quote of Topouzian. The purpose of an encyclopedia article is to provide neutral information about a subject, not to serve as a platform for their own views. Finally, you should make sure that the draft correctly summarizes what the sources report. At several points I found that the sources did not back up the draft's content, at worst even contradicting it. Conversely, basic biographical information reported by your own references didn't make its way into the Wikipedia article. Making sure that the draft is an appropriate summary of what independent sources report is particularly important if, as your username suggests, you are Topouzian - writing an autobiography is strongly discouraged due to the inherent conflict of interest, and you'll have to make doubly sure that you summarize what reliable sources have reported about you; otherwise it may seem as if you're just spinning a tale that's not really backed up by independent facts. Huon (talk) 20:54, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Ara Topouzian has been accepted
[edit]
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Darylgolden(talk) Ping when replying 02:50, 8 March 2015 (UTC)