User talk:AtlanticDeep

Welcome!

Hello, AtlanticDeep, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like The rock czar, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Mr. Vernon (talk) 04:33, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of The rock czar

A tag has been placed on The rock czar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Mr. Vernon (talk) 04:33, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Your request to NiceHotShower

Regarding your requests [1] [2] to NiceHotShower that someone be put on a "blacklist", there is no such thing, and NiceHotShower has been blocked indefinitely for impersonating an administrator. Since there is no obvious reason to believe otherwise it is assumed you were acting in good faith. FYI, you should read this discussion. Please be careful in future.--Wehwalt (talk) 20:09, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Atheism/Homophobia

Just to check, are you of the belief that Humanism and other atheistic ideals fall into the same fold as homophobia? Or was that a misunderstanding on my part? Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 22:54, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

No, but I am essentially protecting another user's right to have whatever userboxes they want on THEIR user page. As I have said, you view pages here at your own risk. If I had a pornographic image on this page right now, same thing. You chose to visit my talkpage, you prepare for what could be in front of you. This is an uncensored website.--AtlanticDeep (talk) 22:57, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

It's not their userpage - it's the Foundation's. If you had a pornographic image on this page, it would be removed - unless there was an encyclopaedic or administrative reason to have it on here. Including information about offensive material is part of Wikipedia's encyclopaedic mission; being offensive is not. We're not a forum for unregulated free speech. Wikipedia:User page would be a good place to brush up on this policy - people can use their user spaces for anything they like, provided it is related in some way to the Wikipedia project, and that the community as a whole is OK with it. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 23:13, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Warning

Friendly warning: This line of discussion will not end anywhere pleasant for anyone involved. Best leave well alone for now. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 23:40, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Barnstar of Diplomacy
		I've been keeping an eye on your edits and your past history, and you thoroughly deserve this for your recent - if small - comments on ANI. People like are are what keep Wikipedia fresh and friendly. Keep up the good work. Another few hundred edits like that and you'll be ripe for the admin's mop, if you want it! Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 22:08, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

You Shoot That Dog

Maybe it is in line with policy, but that isn't immediately apparent, and you can't just say obscure things "in line" with policy; ideally, you should cite policy. Give, for example, a good reason to keep the article? That'd be a start. Ironholds (talk) 02:29, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

I'm trully sorry - I honestly forgot :(. Re socking; It isn't enough to take people at their word when they say they're not and all the evidence points towards the possibility that they are - people have been known to lie! Ironholds (talk) 16:34, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

You're reporting me...

For removing several different incidents of trolling, from the same user, from my own talk page? Wow. Just wow. J Milburn (talk) 23:51, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

I don't know which of your accounts is the master, but I guess this is as good as any

J.delanoy^gabs_adds 00:38, 3 January 2010 (UTC)