User talk:Desire91

Welcome!

Hello, VikiLaikeR199, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Vasily Vlasov, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Bgwhite (talk) 07:43, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vasily Vlasov

The article Vasily Vlasov has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no reliable references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Bgwhite (talk) 07:43, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Andrey Smagin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrey Smagin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrey Smagin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Finngall ^talk 14:27, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Andrey Smagin. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. --Finngall ^talk 17:16, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Green Elephant 2

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Green Elephant 2 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 2.92.78.198 (talk) 20:07, 7 January 2017 (UTC) ru: Участник:VikiLaikeR199[reply]

Please disregard. The A7 speedy deletion criteria specifically do not apply to movies and other creative works, and I have removed the tag accordingly. Have a good day. --Finngall ^talk 21:34, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vasily Vlasov for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vasily Vlasov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vasily Vlasov until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 23:26, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Andrey Smagin) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Andrey Smagin, VikiLaikeR199!

Wikipedia editor Meatsgains just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Consider providing additional reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

To reply, leave a comment on Meatsgains's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Meatsgains (talk) 16:04, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I will try to look for sources--VikiLaikeR199 (talk) 16:09, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Russian politicians

It's good that you are creating articles for Russian politicians, but some will not be notable under Wikipedia guidelines, so articles will be deleted. However, politicians who are elected to national level are notable (for example, it was easy to save the article Vasily Vlasov). I suggest you start at Results of the Russian legislative election, 2016 by constituency or 7th State Duma of the Russian Federation#List of Deputies as there are many deputies of the State Duma without articles. There are also many in the Federation Council without articles. Jack N. Stock (talk) 19:26, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Irina Pshenina

The article Irina Pshenina has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not notable per WP:BIO, no significant coverage in reliable secondary sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jack N. Stock (talk) 02:51, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Oleg Simonov

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Oleg Simonov requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MassiveYR (talk) 08:14, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ответ на предложение участника User:UnderTheDome в рувики

Добрый день уважаемый User:UnderTheDome! Прочитав Ваше обращение ко мне хочу сказать, что я даю согласие на доработку статьи про Жириновского, а потом про ЛДПР. У меня как раз есть материал для доработки статей про мою партию и ее лидера. К сожалению в рувики я заблокирован, но я буду признателен, если вы посодействуете на мою досрочную разблокировку, так как я уже не несу опасности для сообщества Википедии. Еще хочу попросить вас убрать шаблоны ухода из проекта на моей ЛС, я принял окончательное решение навсегда остаться в проекте--Joshua57 (talk) 16:19, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Red&White

Do the shops have many wines? I thought "Red" and "White" of "Red&White" might refer to red wine and white wine after seeing mention in http://www.winereport.ru/wine-who-is-who-in-russia/ Jack N. Stock (talk) 06:16, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I see, now. In http://www.rbc.ru/business/24/02/2015/54eb56279a7947d1aea5d335 - red for wine, white for vodka. Jack N. Stock (talk) 13:40, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gareth Morrison

Hello, Joshua57. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Gareth Morrison, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:04, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง, article Gareth Morrison was slightly modified counterpart Jacknstock, thank him for that. Article has been added to the sources, the actor is really significant, the pattern removal please remove--Joshua57 (talk) 14:33, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Aleksandr Smetanov

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Joshua57, thanks for creating Aleksandr Smetanov!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged for three concerns. His political position is also a little unclear in the article, certainly to those with little knowledge of Russian politics.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 17:22, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Astraekt. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Andrey Smagin (Activist)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Andrey Smagin (Activist) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. power~enwiki (π, ν) 21:52, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aleksandr Smetanov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FSB (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:26, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Andrew Smagin

Hello, Astraekt,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Andrew Smagin should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Smagin .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Icewhiz (talk) 14:05, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 2 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Andrew Smagin. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:16, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete article?

I saw that you blanked Andrew Smagin. As such, I have tagged the article for speedy deletion, as your action indicates to me you want the article removed. Was this your intent?--SamHolt6 (talk) 00:35, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@SamHolt6: Yes, I want this article quickly deleted it now. This is my request. Can you remove it?--Astraekt (talk) 00:37, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have tagged the article for G7 deletion, meaning an admin will take care of it shortly. Cheers.--SamHolt6 (talk) 00:38, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

preferably as quickly as possible the article was removed))--Astraekt (talk) 00:39, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dmitry Sablin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dmitry Sablin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dmitry Sablin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 05:43, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Baltika No. 0 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Baltika No. 0 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baltika No. 0 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jack N. Stock (talk) 04:54, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Desire91. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Desire91. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Smagin moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Andrew Smagin. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ... discospinster _talk 00:21, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]