User talk:Aspiringchemistyht

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Rainbow into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 15:08, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Drillia diasi have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Drillia diasi was changed by Aspiringchemistyht (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.889109 on 2022-09-18T01:07:04+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:07, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Drillia diasi. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 01:27, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Mako001

Hello, Aspiringchemistyht. You have new messages at Mako001's talk page.
Message added 04:39, 26 September 2022 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 04:39, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

thx Aspiringchemistyht (talk) 00:19, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Exotic star. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. a!rado (C✙T) 12:19, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Color theory. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. See MOS:ENGVAR. a!rado (C✙T) 12:23, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

what commentary did i add? Aspiringchemistyht (talk) 02:05, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for late reply, attending university on Saturdays really sucks ass. About commentary: you have tried to add cleanup tags, but not knowing correct templates, you have improvised your own ([1], [2]). There's nothing bad in adding tags to highlight problems with article, you just did it slightly wrong way. I added correct templates after reverting you ([3], [4]). a!rado (C✙T) 19:04, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 03:24, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

what edits did i make Aspiringchemistyht (talk) 04:00, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

umm could you please explain the problematic edits Bbb23 Aspiringchemistyht (talk) 11:59, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i was told that using “ {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} is nesscery

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aspiringchemistyht (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

what disruptive edits have i made? what policies did they break?Aspiringchemistyht (talk) 02:54, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Well, your question is really not a reason we should unblock you, so I'll have to decline this request. But ... I did look at your history and I can at least begin to answer your question. Many, many of the edits you made were reverted, and while it's very late for me as I type this so I'm not looking at many of them, I think that I can safely say there was no reason to add Chinese/Japanese characters here. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:30, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aspiringchemistyht (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I realise that using chinese numerals on wikipedia is confusing and I sincerely apologise for doing so! I vow to never use chinese numerals on the wiki again. Aspiringchemistyht (talk) 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You know perfectly well this doesn't address the problem. Yamla (talk) 10:13, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aspiringchemistyht (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i apologise for any and all disruptive edits . i will make sure any more edits i make are constructive Aspiringchemistyht (talk) 08:36, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed block evasion. Strengthening the block. Yamla (talk) 11:07, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Concern regarding Draft:Hailbow

Hello, Aspiringchemistyht. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hailbow, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Hailbow

Hello, Aspiringchemistyht. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hailbow".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:40, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]