User talk:Aspireforintelligence

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Welcome!

Hello, Aspireforintelligence! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! SweetCanadianMullet 17:02, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Aspireforintelligence, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Aspireforintelligence! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:03, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Greatness of the Sword concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Greatness of the Sword, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Greatness of the Sword

Hello, Aspireforintelligence. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Greatness of the Sword".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 00:01, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The First Teacher (novel) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, The First Teacher (novel), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 06:01, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. This article was translated by me from Russian Wikipedia. Yes, I am working on finding reliable sources for the article.Aspireforintelligence (talk) 13:31, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing inquiry

Hello Aspireforintelligence. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Aspireforintelligence. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Aspireforintelligence|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message.

You recently added a photograph of the Steve Lott to his article and listed the photo as own work. What is your relationship with Steve Lott? If you have been hired to write/work on this or any other Wikipedia article the Terms of Use require the disclosures noted in the template and, recently, that you provide links to any sites where you advertise. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Jbh ^Talk 01:52, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

- Thank you for showing an interest to my work. I must state that I do not get any kind of a financial benefit, nor direct or indirect compensation for editing and writing articles. I write different articles which is easy to verify by my input. I have asked a journalist I know, who recently was in the Boxing Hall of Fame to take a photo of Steve Lott for me.Aspireforintelligence (talk) 13:25, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your prompt response. Our copyright policy requires that the actual author provide copyright release. It is not acceptable for you to upload another's work as 'own work'. You can have the photographer send release information to info-en-c@wikimedia.org. More information can be found at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. Jbh ^Talk 16:35, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See the deletion nomination over on Commons. Jbh ^Talk 16:39, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

- If I may kindly ask: is it about who actually "took the photo" or about who "has the rights" for the photo?Aspireforintelligence (talk) 15:12, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unless you have explicitly obtained the rights to the photo and have a release from the photographer transfering their copyright to you in toto the release needs to come from the photographer. If the work has been released by the photographer under a compatible license elsewhere then documenting that is also acceptable. WP:COPYOTHERS] has more information on that. Jbh ^Talk 15:20, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

- Ok, I will tell the journalist to send an email, as I don't have much time to spend on this. Thanks for a clarificationAspireforintelligence (talk) 18:01, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Non-compromised Pendulum

Hello Aspireforintelligence,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Non-compromised Pendulum for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 22:19, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Aspirations

At the risk of being accused of "outing" you, I will state that you have contacted me by telephone and told me who you are. You undoubtedly have a CoI and, despite your claim above, I consider that your activities here almost certainly count as paid editing which you have not properly declared.

I have moved your article back to draft space. Please wait for it to be properly reviewed. Do not copy it back to mainspace. But the best advice I can give you is to trot out my usual mantra: kindly have the decency to wait until someone with no CoI thinks the book is notable and writes about it here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:32, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Correct, I did phone you and wanted to get some recommendations on how to improve the article, but the line got disconnected for some reason. I am a journalist and it is very improbable that I can benefit from a book which is free. I write about things that are interesting for me. It is not my first article, among other articles I wrote Katagans , Kutlug-Buga , Manasology , The legend of Slovene and Ruse, The Greatness of the Sword. I as a volunteer, felt really bad in regard to the way you wrote about me, I try to make Wikipedia better and spend my time on it. — Aspireforintelligence (talk) 23:13, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your English is very good but you need to learn the difference between cite, sight and site. I agree that with Katagans for example it is difficult to see how you might have any CoI. But when I see your name and mug shot on a site associated with the Non-compromised Pendulum, I say that is prima facie evidence of CoI. The best advice I can give you is this or put in a request at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Boxing. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:38, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Roger, thank you for the advice, but the whole point is that the Non-compromised Pendulum is not a commercial project, the book is not sold, it is a tribute in the memory of Cus D'Amato, it can be downloaded by anybody in Google Books https://books.google.com.ua/books?id=hABrDwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&hl=ru#v=onepage&q&f=false and I am a volunteer of the project, I don't receive any kind of financial or/and non-financial benefit from it. The same applies for the wikipedia, I am a volunteer in here just the way you are and spend my own time to create articles on the topics I know and find interesting. Aspireforintelligence (talk) 18:54, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I found your choice of PRhese as a possible "sponsor" rather curious. He seems to be more concerned with general quality control rather than specifically boxing topics. Instead, look at the main section of category:boxing books. It lists six books. Three of them were created in 2003/2004 by the same person. He is still active. Try asking him for help! — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:54, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, RHaworth. Roger, please see this editing. Aspireforintelligence (talk) 17:33, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Non-compromised Pendulum (October 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Velella was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No reliable and independent evidence of notability. The great majority of the sources are very clearly press releases - they use identical wording and the others seem to be providing evidence of the vires of the two authors, not their book.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Non-compromised Pendulum and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Non-compromised Pendulum, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Velella ^{Velella Talk} 16:04, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Aspireforintelligence. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Aspireforintelligence. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]