User talk:Aspensquiggle

Welcome

Hello Aspensquiggle and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Doug Weller talk 16:05, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ßæ

March 2016

Hello, I'm Mr. Smart LION. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to David has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Mr. Smart ℒION ⋠☎️✍⋡ 15:53, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at David. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(✉) 20:53, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sheena, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Sheena was changed by Aspensquiggle (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.944456 on 2016-03-06T04:54:54+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:54, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Brittany.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Brittany was changed by Aspensquiggle (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.966584 on 2016-03-06T05:05:33+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:05, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Brittany, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. FA9295 (talk) (contributions) 05:09, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 05:51, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aspensquiggle (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I won't do it againAspensquiggle (talk) 15:07, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No, you won't. Talk page access removed. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:22, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Judging from your edits after block, it is very unlikely you will get unblocked.Clubjustin (talk) 15:13, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Aspensquiggle/sandbox/DEEZ BISCUITS

A tag has been placed on User:Aspensquiggle/sandbox/DEEZ BISCUITS requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:50, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]