User talk:Asldfjk

Welcome!

Hello, Asldfjk, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! . . dave souza, talk 10:39, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/gorkan.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 06:57, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Peppered moth. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 21:22, 10 October 2012 (UTC) It was not vandilism!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!![reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:07, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi There!

Hi Asldfjk, welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed you've been taking an interest in the Creationism article--those are some interesting thought experiments you've added to the article. Just know that Wikipedia is written based on scientifically accepted and verified information, and, unfortunately, the ICR is not considered a scientifically reliable source, which means Wikipedia is not allowed to use ISR as a citation for articles, and articles cannot be written from a "creationist" perspective--I think it's going to be a pretty hard time getting that information put in to an article. As a new editor, I would suggest starting with smaller, less drastic edits to articles such as improving composition and punctuation instead of trying to right great wrongs--you can become a great contributor! If you would like some more help, please let me know at my talk page. Thanks! Mildly Mad^T_C 19:43, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re your user page, you might like to note the Rev. Joachim Neander, and you'll probably find it helpful if you can check claims against this index. . . dave souza, talk 20:55, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

talkorigins.org

Check out [1]. If you accidentally have an original thought, please let someone know so it can be added to the list. I can copy and paste too, check this out...

TippyGoomba (talk) 06:24, 3 November 2012 (UTC) Thanks173.17.160.154 (talk) 15:12, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lego monster fighters

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lego monster fighters requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Rockstonetalk to me! 04:01, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lego monster fighters

Hello Asldfjk,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Lego monster fighters for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Midhart90 (talk) 20:35, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

www.icr.org

I visited [2] as you suggested but didn't find any evidence for Yahweh, can you be more specific? TippyGoomba (talk) 05:26, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep looking.Asldfjk (talk) 19:34, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No thanks. TippyGoomba (talk) 04:41, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I added more links.Asldfjk (talk) 18:24, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Noah's Ark, you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 20:54, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

your userpage

Dear Asldfjk, DragonflySixtyseven asked me to review his deletion of your userpage, in order to avoid any doubt about his reasons. Taking a look at the deleted page I found it was definitely out of scope: according to WP:UP you cannot use your userpage as a free webspace nor to do propaganda for anything. Finally please remember Wikipedia is not a playground nor a place for quarrelling. See you. --Vituzzu (talk) 22:36, 8 January 2013 (UTC)Then what is it for? Asldfjk (talk) 16:32, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]