User talk:Chirag.Saluja

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Ask2Human", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, service, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people, and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, service, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username, by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 08:55, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ian.thomson: Thank you for educating me. I've just requested to change the username of my profile. I appreciate your help. Ask2Human (talk) 11:23, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Links

Hi - a quick note about adding links to articles. Links are a vital part of any Wikipedia article, but it is possible to have too many, and it is also possible for them to be added incorrectly. In this edit, there were a number of issues:

you linked to Scottish, which you will see takes you to a disambiguation page which would not be helpful to the reader. You should check where your links go, and if it is to a disambig page you should select the correct article and pipe your link to it.
you also linked to Charlotte Temple, which has got nothing whatsoever to do with this article - the Charlotte Temple who met and lived with Macpherson Grant in the mid-nineteenth century is not the same person as Charlotte Temple, the titular character in a work of fiction published in 1791.

You could argue the case for some of the other links you made there, but I don't really think that any of them were necessary so I have removed them all. This article went through a featured article review by multiple very experienced editors, which concluded only last week, and none of them thought it necessary to link any of those words. You can read more about linking at MOS:LINK, but please be a lot more careful in future to ensure that you don't introduce misleading links into articles, especially when you are editing a featured or good article (which will already have been extensively reviewed). Thanks GirthSummit _(blether) 12:34, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Girth Summit: Thank you Girth. You really a Good Teacher. I'll take care of this in future edits. Regards, Chirag.Saluja (talk) 08:26, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar errors

I am concerned that your "fixes" for grammar are making things worse rather than better. I selected a few diffs and found that you introduced as many grammar errors as you fixed. Is English your second language? Please consider using a dictionary or grammar checking software. Elizium23 (talk) 18:02, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Bunnicula. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 18:05, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Elizium23:Hello My friend, I never used any styles in any of the articles. Regards, Chirag.Saluja (talk)

I was referring to your linking of years like 2019. Per MOS:YEARLINK: Month-and-day articles (e.g. February 24 and 10 July) and year articles (e.g. 1795, 1955, 2007) should not be linked unless the linked date or year has a significant connection to the subject of the linking article, beyond that of the date itself, so that the linking enhances the reader's understanding of the subject. Elizium23 (talk) 18:19, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Elizium23:I got you my friend. Will take care of this in future. Thanks. Regards, Chirag.Saluja (talk)

@Elizium23:I need to ask one more thing, if you can help. Is it allowed to delete old conversation from the talk page? Thanks. Regards, Chirag.Saluja (talk)

Yes, it is allowed, although archiving is preferred. Elizium23 (talk) 19:14, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for help my friend. Regards, Chirag.Saluja (talk)

Language variants

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please also do not change spellings particular to one or other variant of English language spellings. Please see WP:ENGVAR for more details. Articles written in British English spelling are as acceptable as those using American English spelling and the spellings should not be changed from one variant to the other. Thank you. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 21:12, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I got you my friend. Thanks. Regards, Chirag.Saluja (talk)

April 2020

Hello, I'm JimRenge. An edit that you recently made to Myanmar seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Archived versions of the external links are available. JimRenge (talk) 19:32, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I'll add the Archived versions of the external links instead. Regards, Chirag.Saluja (talk) 20:12, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for making a report about Azan1111 (talk · contribs · block log) on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, it appears that the editor you reported may not have engaged in vandalism, or the user was not sufficiently or appropriately warned. Please note there is a difference between vandalism and unhelpful or misguided edits made in good faith. If the user continues to vandalise after a recent final warning, please re-report it. Thank you. IanDBeacon (talk) 18:29, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I already reverted the edit of user and I thought, only admin or extended users have the option to warn. Thank you for clearing my doubt. Regards, Chirag.Saluja (talk) 18:38, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:03, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]