User talk:Asifbwp110

May 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Eva Kushner, did not appear constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ashley yoursmile! 08:16, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Shahzad Sheikh. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – 108.56.139.120 (talk) 10:06, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

yes

g kha khana h Asifbwp110 (talk) 08:20, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Asifbwp110, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Asifbwp110! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

June 2021

Please refrain from hijacking pages as you did with Asif. Should you believe the subject you were writing about deserves an article, please use the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version that you can then get feedback on. Also see Wikipedia's disambiguation guideline which indicates how to handle separate subjects with similar names. If you continue to hijack an existing article, you may be blocked from editing. If you have any questions, you are always welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 11:44, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Hello, I'm SunDawn. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Danish Taimoor, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. SunDawn (talk) 11:37, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Danish Taimoor. ‑‑Volteer1 (talk) 19:04, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Google Knowledge Graph have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Google Knowledge Graph was changed by Asifbwp110 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.868551 on 2021-07-28T04:01:33+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:01, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:59, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]