User talk:Ashwinvis

Welcome!

Hello, Ashwinvis, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:FluidDyn project, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 23:46, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: FluidDyn project (July 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MJL was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs additional WP:Reliable sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:FluidDyn project and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:FluidDyn project, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

–MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 23:46, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ashwinvis! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 23:46, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Thank you for your review. Can you elaborate what kind of more sources do you expect?

At the current state of the draft, we already cite peer reviewed article in well-known journals. These articles were reviewed by other people who are not involved in the project and thus are reliable. Apart from documentation, and links to software archives, we can only offer:

other articles which have been produced using these softwares - but would that be relevant?
discussions in social media (reddit, twitter)
links to other wikipedia page which have similar purposes

Being an budding open-source project, this is all we can provide. We don't have newspaper articles, for example. In my opinion in much better state than articles of much more popular projects like Numba, which has no references but just links to their websites. Ashwinvis (talk) 08:15, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

None of the types of sources you have listed are suitable for the purposes of demonstrating notability - indeed, they are not even suitable as sources for verifying content. If such sources are all that is available, then your company is not a suitable topic for Wikipedia to have an article on. Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:16, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have a strong correction to make: this page is not about a company and not even a non-profit organization. We are not a corporate entity. This is an academic open-source project, so published peer-reviewed papers, conferences posters and related webpages we can provide, if needed. See for example FEniCS_Project which has a similar page and is similar approach that we took. Ashwinvis (talk) 09:21, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tomayto, tomahto. Company or project doesn't really matter; the point is that you appear to be here solely to ensure that Wikipedia has an entry on FluidDyn, regardless of whether Wikipedia actually wants such an entry or not. Since you have an obvious conflict of interest with the project, and since the content you're adding is very clearly intended to drive traffic towards it, you can expect to be treated like any other editor who is promoting their company, whether the entity in question is actually a company or not. Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:29, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have raised several objections, allegations and set high standards, which I don't see other articles such as Numba, FEniCS_Project following. This former has only organization links, and the latter was only created by an anonymous author. I have found a couple of secondary sources which list the projects mentioned. I would appreciate constructive criticism, if you can provide it. Otherwise, thank you for your answers. Ashwinvis (talk) 09:43, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: FluidDyn project (October 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please remove external links from the body of the article we don't use them.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:FluidDyn project and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:FluidDyn project, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 21:05, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:FluidDyn project concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:FluidDyn project, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:FluidDyn project

Hello, Ashwinvis. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "FluidDyn project".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Snowycats (talk) 22:35, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]