User talk:Ashugaur

Komal Chauhan moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Komal Chauhan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Maliner (talk) 13:11, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ashugaur

Hello Ashugaur,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ashugaur for deletion, because it seems to be a test. Did you know that the Wikipedia Sandbox is available for testing out edits?

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 06:45, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ashu gaur for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ashu gaur is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashu gaur until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

----modern_primat ඞඞඞ ^TALK 12:27, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Reference sources in article for IMDB, links are very much genuine. Infact although I also write articles for News, Blogs but never linked those as they were self-written (So just added the Website in Additional Links). Social Projects, Activities and other information posted on the Page very much authentic and Genuine with Print Media References all available on the Official Links Ashu Gaur | Business & Technology Consultant | (talk) 13:55, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UCMAS Delhi showcases it's success story through their marvellous students | Indiablooms - First Portal on Digital News Management

I don't know if this link is ideal for creating citations, can be added or not. Rest assured will not make any changes to the profile which are in violation to policy of wiki or are not approved reference links. The intent was never promotion or marketing, was to add social intitiatives and campaign in right place. Ashu Gaur | Business & Technology Consultant | (talk) 05:27, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

do you get money for editing?

this is just a humble question, please dont hesitate to answer, thanks. ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ ^TALK 12:28, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, editing here on Wiki is not for money or any professional engagement, nor im into content marketing or so Ashu Gaur | Business & Technology Consultant | (talk) 13:37, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks that you asked this question humbly, being a strategist, i believe in the era of AI, Wiki no longer the source of information for future when AI is there to answer. Infact i believe soon there will be innovations implemented on Wiki as well Ashu Gaur | Business & Technology Consultant | (talk) 13:45, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This edit not only promoted your business website, but introduced spam information about dandelions providing anti-disease effects, for which there is no good scientific evidence. We use WP:MEDRS sources for health claims.

Further, you signed the above messages as a consultant, which indicates you are attempting to attract business. Wikipedia is not a place for self-promotion. Reporting you to admin. Zefr (talk) 03:15, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, Im trying had to find the place where the signed Real Name, Profile is being attached. Now i do understand what mistake i did by Signing with my Real Name, Profile. So, I should have used some generic Name instead, which don't relate to my identity. I always believed using my real name as username everywhere, so made this mistake on wiki, where real name may lead ot self-promotions. Ashu Gaur | Business & Technology Consultant | (talk) 05:36, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your input helped me to find the Signatures which I was using in itself was violating the Wiki Policies. Made changes to it now, Thanks Ashugaur (talk) 05:40, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, as you did at Taraxacum, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You are using this website for promotion. It mentions your name, which is the same as your Wikipedia username. This is a violation of Wikipedia policy. Reporting you to admin. Zefr (talk) 17:31, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The message on your user page should be here where it can be discussed. You are promoting a business, and the links you wish to add are not WP:RS, but rather are spam, such as the one you added at Taraxacum. Further business promotion or adding further spam sources will result in a report to admin, with recommendation for being blocked from editing.

If you wish to learn how to edit Wikipedia using reliable sources, ask for help at the Tea House. Zefr (talk) 03:07, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. But it was not just one link which i posted from blog, i genuinely added something (India) with its Liver Detox Uses with another links as well (Protective Effects of Taraxacum officinale L. (Dandelion) Root Extract in Experimental Acute on Chronic Liver Failure - PMC (nih.gov)) believing the information is non-biased, research link. Rest accepted that link to my own article was against Wiki Policy. Instead of deleting entire content, under Herb Uses I wished to mention its Implications on Human Health to be added to the Article. Ashu Gaur | Business & Technology Consultant | (talk) 03:15, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Pravessh Rana has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Uploaded and inserted image is not free R0paire-wiki (talk) 03:32, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:47, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

Ashugaur (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Linking Own Articles and My User Name vs the Author Name for the Articles were matching so the Content was considered as Self-Promotions. Agreed and Accepted now that this somewhere is Violation of Wiki Content Policies so will refrain in using my Articles, Sources or News Websites for Providing Reference Sources. But also here I would wish to ask one thing, Suppose a Reputed News Link form a Media Website where I'm Author with same User-Name as that on Wiki, is that too non permitted because while many users take non generic names as user names on wiki, i preferred to choose my own identity for that, which may be coming cause of concern to some extend as it relates to self-promotions. Rest upto the Editors to Accept this Unblock Request or Not, as the intent was nowhere self-promotion or mislead, for Promotions I don't wish to rely on wiki, i already have reached to a reputation where need not to engage unethical shortcuts for it. Thanks in advance. Ashu Gaur | Business & Technology Consultant | (talk) 05:03, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Linking Own Articles and My User Name vs the Author Name for the Articles were matching so the Content was considered as Self-Promotions. Agreed and Accepted now that this somewhere is Violation of Wiki Content Policies so will refrain in using my Articles, Sources or News Websites for Providing Reference Sources. But also here I would wish to ask one thing, Suppose a Reputed News Link form a Media Website where I'm Author with same User-Name as that on Wiki, is that too non permitted because while many users take non generic names as user names on wiki, i preferred to choose my own identity for that, which may be coming cause of concern to some extend as it relates to self-promotions. Rest upto the Editors to Accept this Unblock Request or Not, as the intent was nowhere self-promotion or mislead, for Promotions I don't wish to rely on wiki, i already have reached to a reputation where need not to engage unethical shortcuts for it. Thanks in advance.  [[User:Ashugaur|Ashu Gaur &#124; Business & Technology Consultant &#124;]] ([[User talk:Ashugaur#top|talk]]) 05:03, 14 October 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Linking Own Articles and My User Name vs the Author Name for the Articles were matching so the Content was considered as Self-Promotions. Agreed and Accepted now that this somewhere is Violation of Wiki Content Policies so will refrain in using my Articles, Sources or News Websites for Providing Reference Sources. But also here I would wish to ask one thing, Suppose a Reputed News Link form a Media Website where I'm Author with same User-Name as that on Wiki, is that too non permitted because while many users take non generic names as user names on wiki, i preferred to choose my own identity for that, which may be coming cause of concern to some extend as it relates to self-promotions. Rest upto the Editors to Accept this Unblock Request or Not, as the intent was nowhere self-promotion or mislead, for Promotions I don't wish to rely on wiki, i already have reached to a reputation where need not to engage unethical shortcuts for it. Thanks in advance.  [[User:Ashugaur|Ashu Gaur &#124; Business & Technology Consultant &#124;]] ([[User talk:Ashugaur#top|talk]]) 05:03, 14 October 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Linking Own Articles and My User Name vs the Author Name for the Articles were matching so the Content was considered as Self-Promotions. Agreed and Accepted now that this somewhere is Violation of Wiki Content Policies so will refrain in using my Articles, Sources or News Websites for Providing Reference Sources. But also here I would wish to ask one thing, Suppose a Reputed News Link form a Media Website where I'm Author with same User-Name as that on Wiki, is that too non permitted because while many users take non generic names as user names on wiki, i preferred to choose my own identity for that, which may be coming cause of concern to some extend as it relates to self-promotions. Rest upto the Editors to Accept this Unblock Request or Not, as the intent was nowhere self-promotion or mislead, for Promotions I don't wish to rely on wiki, i already have reached to a reputation where need not to engage unethical shortcuts for it. Thanks in advance.  [[User:Ashugaur|Ashu Gaur &#124; Business & Technology Consultant &#124;]] ([[User talk:Ashugaur#top|talk]]) 05:03, 14 October 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}