User talk:Ashuduff

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Ashuduff, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Extraordinary Machine 16:51, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hilary Duff articles

Your recent contribution(s) to Wikipedia are very much appreciated. However, you did not provide references or sources for your information. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. If sources are left unreferenced, it may count as original research, which is not allowed. Can you provide in the article specific references to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content in the article? You can use a citation method listed at inline citations that best suits each article. Thanks! Extraordinary Machine 16:51, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above applies to Play with Fire (song). Also, please note that music video countdowns and iTunes charts are not official charts.
I have noted that you often edit without an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. An edit summary is even more important if you delete any text; otherwise, people may think you're being sneaky. Also, mentioning one change but not another one can be misleading to someone who finds the other one more important; add "and misc." to cover the other change(s). Thanks! Extraordinary Machine 13:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please do not insert section headers in a small section of text, as you did at Santa Claus Lane. Wikipedia:Guide_to_layout#Structure_of_the_article recommends against this because it makes articles look cluttered and inhibits their flow. As a rule of thumb, separate sections should contain at least two paragraphs each. Thanks. Extraordinary Machine 13:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are providing links, such as http://www.the-raft.com/hilaryduff, that do not support the facts that you are trying to cite in the article. Please stop this. Extraordinary Machine 17:12, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please make sure to cite your sources, specifically reliable ones, whenever adding or changing information such as sales. I know this can be a pain, but it means that anyone reading the article in the future will know that the information came from somewhere and may be considered reliable. Think about it: what's the point of adding information if there's no way of knowing whether it's true? Extraordinary Machine 13:18, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, in accordance with the guidelines at Wikipedia:WikiProject Music/Tables for charts, chart trajectories should be excluded from articles. Thanks. Extraordinary Machine 19:02, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with the page Hilary Duff on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 02:13, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Fly (Hilary Duff song), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- lucasbfr ^talk 06:13, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Fly Article

Errr I didn't quite understand what you meant to be honest :D. To edit a whole article, you can click the "Edit this page" tab at the top of each page (beside the "Article", "Discussion" and the "History" tabs). Hope that helps! Happy Editing! -- lucasbfr ^talk 06:43, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to About Us (Darkchild Remix)

Your recent edit to About Us (Darkchild Remix) (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 01:58, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Play With Fire

I'm not sure what you mean, but it's a print reference, not a web reference, so there isn't a link I can provide. Do you mean when you click on the number, it doesn't take you to the reference at the bottom? If so, that's because the reference is too near the bottom of the page for you to be taken there directly.

Also, it is precedent for numbers under ten to be written out in full (e.g. number one, not number 1); for numbers under 100, a university professor of English said most major style manuals recommend that they be written out as well (though Wikipedia says nothing about those). Please make sure to capitalise only first words and proper nouns in section headers, for example "Song and music video", not "Song and Music Video". In fact it's not wise to title a section "Song", because the whole article is about the song. And component charts such as the Hot Digital Songs should not be included in certain circumstances; see Wikipedia:Record charts for more info on this. I know this may be a lot to take in; I felt like this when I first started editing. But I am a Hilary Duff fan as well, so I hope we can work together, and with other editors who are willing, to make the articles on her songs and albums better. Thanks! Extraordinary Machine 17:25, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

66.21.220.86

Greetings,

I left 66.21.220.86 a warning. Looks like a newbie; best to be nice to them, until they are repeat offenders. He hasn't edited for several hours anyway. If he comes back and is a problem, you can always list him at administrator attention against vandalism. Thanks, Antandrus (talk) 03:23, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

i didnt write that ciara article, i just was trying to fix it, i want to become and admin, so i did that so i can have more edits, u know how that works

a life

ui need to get a life, fa real, erasin everyones artcles, u 14, go do something else

Fair Use Images in userspace

I just wanted to alert you that I removed some images from your userspace per WP:FUC. SOADLuver 07:01, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Your a Hilary Duff fan include your username in this category that i just created: Category:Wikipedians who listen to Hilary Duff. Quasyboy 13:10, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hilary Duff (album)

I've just removed the worldwide sales figure supported by http://buenavistarecords.go.com/hilaryduff/index2.html (Duff's official website), which states "Hilary’s #1 solo debut CD "Metamorphosis sold 4 times platinum, followed by her self –titled album and “Most Wanted” both of which sold 3 million records." It doesn't say Hilary Duff and Most Wanted sold three million copies each worldwide (because they say Metamorphosis "sold 4 times platinum", they're probably referring to combined U.S.-only sales for the two albums anyway), and what's more, record labels often use the term "records" to refer to combined album and single sales. I'd be very careful about taking what you read in official website biographies and other material originating from the record company at face value; usually what they do is a) exaggerate sales figures, typically by reporting numbers of shipments to retailers as "sales", and/or b) write the material ambiguously enough that it could be misinterpreted as saying something more positive (e.g. a higher sales figure) than is actually true. Extraordinary Machine 21:00, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Hey im a huge Hilary Duff fan! Are u buying Dignity?

OF COURSE! :D! Ashu just worked hard. xD 06:19, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Heres a smile for you

QuasyBoy has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Enjoy this smile from one Duff-Head to another. QuasyBoy 1:13, 1 April 2007 (UTC).

References and edit summaries

Please do not use message board posts as references, because they are not reliable.
When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. Extraordinary Machine 14:02, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:With_Love_Europe_Cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:With_Love_Europe_Cover.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:02, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Look at this!

Check out userbox that I created → {{User:UBX/Hilary Duff}}. Feel free to add it to your userpage. QuasyBoy 10:09, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dignity (album)

Hi, I just thought you should know that .tk websites are unreliable sources because anyone can make one. Thanks! Extraordinary Machine 21:46, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Port Dickson Festivals

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Port Dickson Festivals requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.), but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Epeefleche (talk) 04:55, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Numoni

Hello Ashuduff,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Numoni for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:01, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Hi, thanks for message. After its nomination by admin Kudpung กุดผึ้ง as spam with no evidence of notability, I deleted your article because

it did not provide adequate independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Although you provided references, they all appear to be to local print productions which it is not feasible for us to verify or inspect. If the company is, as you claim, "the leader in its field", there should be reputable third-party web resources you could use.
it's all about what the company sells, little about the company itself. Where are its headquarters? How many employees (only given in infobox)? Turnover? Profits?
it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unverifiable claims presented as fact include: ... that enable the underbanked to carry out micro- transactions... Numoni is committed to empowering the underbanked in any part of the world, to make e-transactions effectively and securely... Numoni also builds on its relationships with other organisations... From inception, Numoni understood that virtual currencies and mobile wallets will have a tremendous impact on daily lives, in light of the incredible global penetration of mobile phones that today reaches all communities (its founder is not an independent reliable source)... showcased...

Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:38, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Numoni

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Numoni requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Gbawden (talk) 11:21, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ashuduff. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ashuduff. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ashuduff. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Legal Industry has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Legal Industry. Thanks! User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 22:26, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Legal industry by country has been accepted

Legal industry by country, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Primefac (talk) 13:02, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]