User talk:Ashleyvance

Zip K

Zip K is an American Rapper from Atlanta, Georgia.

Speedy deletion nomination of B.A.M.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on B.A.M., requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for Deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 11:10, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Smash David

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Smash David, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:49, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Smash David, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please do not remove a speedy delete notice from an article you created yourself. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 01:45, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Brandon (B.A.M.) Hodge for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brandon (B.A.M.) Hodge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brandon (B.A.M.) Hodge until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Magnolia677 (talk) 01:54, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Brandon (B.A.M.) Hodge

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Brandon (B.A.M.) Hodge, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Magnolia677 (talk) 01:57, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Smash David, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 01:05, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ashleyvance (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was wrongly blocked

Decline reason:

You have been evading your block as you are Confirmed to Samanthagreymusic.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 19:59, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am under investigation, apparently, for being affliated with the account "Xboxmanwar," but need to prove that is not the case.

I have no knowledge to why Xboxmanwar had created/edited the same pages as I have in the past. Please let me know how best to move forward.

You were not blocked as a sock of Xboxmanwar.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:33, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|Why was I blocked?}} Then why was I blocked? I see my name came up as a potential sock but was ruled out in the end. Could you message me back, I sent you an email.

You were blocked as a sock of J23dreamer (talk · contribs). PhilKnight (talk) 01:14, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|This isn't making any sense..}}

My "block" message/purpose reads: "Abusing multiple accounts: Please see: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Xboxmanwar"

It doesn't list any alleged affiliations with J23dreamer, not that there are any. Since I've been cleared of all Xboxmanwar charges, can I please have my block removed? This has nothing to do with me.

{{unblock|This isn't making any sense..}} This is preposterous. I'm seeing my "confirmation of being connected with J23dreamer," though I have no idea how that conclusion was drawn. I've never managed an account outside of this one and it seems the account I'm accused of being a sock of, does not share any similar contributions as I...?

Please list the justification to why my account has been deemed a sock of J23dreamer.... because.. that just isn't true.

Please, how do I further the investigation to go about proving this?

I'm sure our IPs don't match up, so I'm not sure how I was assumed to be a sock of Jdreamer