User talk:AshethCat

Excited to see what happens...

AshethCat, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi AshethCat! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Westmoreland (actor) (September 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Probably notable, but there's currently only one decent source for establishing this.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:James Westmoreland (actor) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 08:14, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:James Westmoreland (actor)

Hello, AshethCat. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:James Westmoreland (actor), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:01, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:James Westmoreland (actor)

Hello, AshethCat. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "James Westmoreland".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 13:05, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Tom Brewitt article, and I couldn't find one either. If you have a reliable source please let me know and we can change the article. Please let me know if you have any questions. Giant Snowman 10:01, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @GiantSnowman, thanks for pointing out the lack of references in my changes to the Tom Brewitt article. I've done some reading regarding which sources Wikipedia considers reliable for football statistics, and I sourced the stats in my revision from FBRef which I believe is well-regarded - would you be able to confirm that you agree this is an acceptable source? If so, I will reinstate my revision and add in the required reference(s) AshethCat (talk) 13:02, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Soccerway/Soccerbase are preferred. Giant Snowman 13:04, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have improved referencing/formatting and corrected some errors. Giant Snowman 13:36, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thank you! For the large horizontal lines (rather than 0, 0) in the Career Statistics, I was trying to follow the style of James Milner, which is listed as a 'good article' - are those not actually meant to be used? AshethCat (talk) 18:01, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ryan Sandford moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Ryan Sandford. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 20:42, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ryan Sandford

Hello, AshethCat. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ryan Sandford, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:06, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ryan Sandford (October 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Demt1298 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:GNG due to no WP:SIGCOV sourced in current article. Find secondary sources that reference subject of article to improve article and resubmit. Demt1298 (talk) 20:10, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ryan Sandford and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Demt1298 (talk) 20:10, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]