User talk:Aryzad

Nomination of Caesar's planned invasion of the Parthian Empire for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Caesar's planned invasion of the Parthian Empire is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caesar's planned invasion of the Parthian Empire until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. LouisAragon (talk) 16:04, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Images on commons

Hi thanks for uploading numerous valuable images to Commons.[1] However, please bear in mind that its important to add a source (e.g. direct link) for the material you decide to upload. Also, please add a proper title for the images you upload. Makes it much easier to categorize/recognize pictures. Best, - LouisAragon (talk) 22:03, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, your welcome. I don't have a link. These images were in just in my archive. And for the second part, I've changed the descriptions. Amir El Mander (talk) 22:22, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, House of Achaemenes

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, House of Achaemenes. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Achaemenid Kingdom. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Achaemenid Kingdom. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Daiyusha (talk) 06:40, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Moving articles

Please dont move articles without any form for discussion, thanks. --HistoryofIran (talk) 19:33, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Portal:Roman–Persian Wars

Portal:Roman–Persian Wars, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Roman–Persian Wars and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Roman–Persian Wars during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:14, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. - LouisAragon (talk) 15:02, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I'll do my best. Aryzad (talk) 15:09, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Amghishiya/edit

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Amghishiya/edit, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a test page. (See section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
It is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. (See section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. qedk (t 桜 c) 19:07, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay, you can delete it. I needed help of ContentTranslation2, which I couldn't use it with sandbox and I needed a real page. Aryzad (talk) 19:11, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Persian Empire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ahmad Shah (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:56, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done Aryzad (talk) 13:42, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 29

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Persian Empire (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Greek, Parthian, Armenian, Kurdish, Azerbaijani, Sogdian, Bactrian and Gilaki

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:38, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve House of Zik

Hello, Aryzad,

Thanks for creating House of Zik! I edit here too, under the username Doomsdayer520 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Thank you for your new article on the House of Zik.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:37, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Turanians of Shahnameh

A tag has been placed on Category:Turanians of Shahnameh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:27, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Thanks for creating Sasanian economy.

User:Doomsdayer520 while reviewing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Thank you for your new article on the Sasanian economy.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 18:24, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Hi, i reported the disruptive user on Sahar Khodayari to AN3, i think it's better for you to stop reverting him, because you risk to be blocked too in the process. I suggest to wait for an admin to step in and deal with him, then we will be able to reinstate the last clean version safely. Cheers.---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:14, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, we'll wait. Thanks for informing me. Aryzad (talk) 22:15, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Best.---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:17, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Babak Khorramdin

I've changed it now [2] Best to keep an on eye on the link in case it gets disrupted again. --HistoryofIran (talk) 17:07, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good. However, they will do that again. Aryzad (talk) 17:27, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Question about meaning of Persian word

User:Aryzad, Hi. I am of the assumption that you speak Persian. May I please ask you about the meaning of the Persian word ""farshegan" or "parshegan." Does this word in Persian mean "version" or "copy"? I am in need of its accurate translation.Davidbena (talk) 18:38, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Davidbena:. Persian is my mother tongue and I will be glad to help; but I've never heard about this word. Can you write it in Perso-Arabic script? Persian word version and copy is "nosxe" "نسخه". Aryzad (talk) 18:47, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The word appears in the Aramaic translation of the Hebrew Bible (in Deuteronomy 17:18), as פרשגן (farshegan or parshegan), but it is also said to be spelt פתשגן (transliteration: fatshegen, or patshegen), a substitute word for the Hebrew word "copy," and said by lexicographer Marcus Jastrow, in his Dictionary of the Targumim and Midrashic Literature, to be a Persian word having the connotation of repetition, copy, abstract. The medieval rabbi, Saadia Gaon, translates the word in Judeo-Arabic, writing as you did, "nosxe" "نسخه", or "version" for this same word. I do not know how the word would have been written in Old Persian, although it was something like fatshegen, or patshegen.Davidbena (talk) 19:10, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Davidbena: I think the word looks like a Middle Persian word, since -gān is a Middle Persian suffix, but I'm not sure. Also, Middle Persian word for version is "pachen". It is possible that parshegan is Aramaic form of a loanword, but we can't be sure.

Yes, نسخه is an Arabic word[3]. Aryzad (talk) 19:37, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. So how would you write in Middle Persian the word "pachen", which, as you said, means "version"?Davidbena (talk) 20:27, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Davidbena: Your welcome.

Sorry, Middle Persian was written in Pahlavi script, and I can't write in Pahlavi. pachen in Perso-Arabic is: پچین. Here is a link to پچین in a dictionary. However, the word is not widely used in New Persian. Aryzad (talk) 20:48, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Davidbena: Also in Wiktionary [4] [5]; Hebrew word paṯšéḡen is also mentioned in Wiktionary. Aryzad (talk) 20:52, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Aryzad: Thank-you very much for your kind and thorough reply. Your source writes Persian: پچین, romanized: pačin, and is said to mean "copy," or "an identical duplication," although for the lack of a Pahlavi script I wrote here Perso-Arabic. This was, indeed, helpful! Again, thanks!Davidbena (talk) 21:32, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Davidbena: Your welcome! I'm glad I was able to help. Aryzad (talk) 21:50, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

Your recent editing history at Ottoman Empire shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Khirurg (talk) 15:29, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Khirurg: I am trying to solve to problem by adding more sources and he is removing sourced content. I've asked him to join the discussion. Twice. You should warn him, not me. Aryzad (talk) 15:47, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Churchill's Dog in the Manger Quotation

I disagree strenuously regarding the importance of the Dog in the Manger quotation from W. Churchill. I've seen it floating around the internet for years before I fully understood what it was about. The quotation is extremely misleading on its own without further context. Please do not contribute further to the problem. He made those comments in the context of the Peel Commission. He was really making a point about Jews and Arabs in Palestine, it had nothing per se to do with his views of natives of either America or Australia. And it was not an endorsement of displacing the Arabs, which again the entire context of his testimony (can be found in book by Martin Gilbert I cited) reveal quite explicitly but is hidden by the clipped quotation. If you wanted to be a reductionist and ask for a single most important quote summarizing Churchill's racial views how about the following "What is the sense of being against a man simply because of his birth?” — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.202.209.215 (talk) 23:02, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The quote is used by a reliable source.[6] Removing it is not a good idea. However, as I said in the edit summary, you can add a scholar's opinion about the quote to make it more encyclopedic. If you can you think "Native Americans" is not a good title for the section, then change it to, for example, "Jewish migration to Palestine".
The article is not just about his racist comments. It's about his racial views. If "What is the sense of being against a man simply because of his birth?" is verifiable, then there is nothing wrong with adding it to the article. Aryzad (talk) 00:54, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Racial views of Winston Churchill for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Racial views of Winston Churchill is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Racial views of Winston Churchill until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. No Great Shaker (talk) 10:41, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Varzesh3

The article Varzesh3 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sources not reliable, doesn't meet WP:NWEB or WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lynndonald (talk) 11:15, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Achaemenid Kingdom

The article Achaemenid Kingdom has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No such thing as an "Achaemenid kingdom" distinct from the later Achaemenid Empire. The article is just a low-effort collection of mostly genealogical details copied/taken over from primary or outdated sources, or other wikipedia articles.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Avilich (talk) 00:12, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Achaemenid Kingdom

The article Achaemenid Kingdom has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:43, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Achaemenid Kingdom for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Achaemenid Kingdom is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Achaemenid Kingdom until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Avilich (talk) 15:46, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Iranian people of Roman descent has been nominated for renaming

Category:Iranian people of Roman descent has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 20:59, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Saadi Shirazi has been nominated for deletion

Category:Saadi Shirazi has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 13:38, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]