User talk:Arttalk1984

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nahem Shoa (July 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nahem Shoa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 14:00, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Arttalk1984, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 14:00, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nahem Shoa (August 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JSFarman was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nahem Shoa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JSFarman (talk) 04:47, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Arttalk1984, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! JSFarman (talk) 04:47, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Arttalk1984 (talk) 16:02, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've done the best with a friend to improve this submission. Let me know what you think. I hope it is a lot better. This is my first talk page effort, so it is all new to me. Arttalk1984 Arttalk1984 (talk) 16:02, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nahem Shoa (September 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nahem Shoa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:23, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Arttalk1984, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:23, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nahem Shoa

Hi there! I have spent some time working on your draft article about Nahem Shoa. I made many small tweaks for grammar, clarity, readability and encyclopedic tone, and formatted all your references correctly (except for a few that I don't think will be needed in the article due to not containing the information they're meant to be the sources for). I also littered the draft with [citation needed] and [not in citation given] notations — not to be mean, but to let you know where there is a problem and what the problem is. In several places I also inserted  that will only show up in the edit window, to further clarify what's wrong with a particular reference. You can just delete the invisible notes once you feel you've addressed the issue each one raised. You can also delete the {{citation needed}} and {{failed verification}} templates once you feel you've addressed each one adequately, either by inserting a reliable source or by deleting the unsourced statement.

You've made a lot of progress on this draft, and I believe it's close to being able to achieve approval to article status. Mr Shoa is an interesting person, and I think you have found just enough reliable sources to justify an encyclopedia article about him. Feel free to visit my user (talk) page if you have any questions about my edits and/or notes. I plan to come back and give the article at least one more once-over after you have worked on it again. —GrammarFascist (talk) 08:13, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks now I have an idea what to do 17:11, 8 September 2015 (UTC)~ Thanks for all your help. I have learnt a lot from you, for example in how to be thorough in editing. I hope after all this work the Draft can now become an Article. Arttalk1984 (talk) 07:30, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nahem Shoa has been accepted

Nahem Shoa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 04:00, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nahem Shoa has been nominated for Did You Know

Hello, Arttalk1984. Nahem Shoa, an article you either created or significantly contributed to, has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 02:22, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Nahem Shoa

Hello! Your submission of Nahem Shoa at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 20:32, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Nahem Shoa

On 13 November 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Nahem Shoa, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that some of the British painter Nahem Shoa's portraits (example pictured) were painted at up to 15 times life size? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Nahem Shoa. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

		The Special Barnstar
		Congratulations on your diligence and persistence, you've created an interesting and needed article! Please continue with your contributions, they are valued. Sctechlaw (talk) 02:15, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Without help from GrammarFascist I would not have been able to complete the article. Arttalk1984 (talk) 12:40, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Arttalk1984. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Hello, I'm Levi OP. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Nahem Shoa, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! ― Levi_OP^Talk 14:49, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]