User talk:ArticleCreatorinEnglish

This is ArticleCreatorinEnglish's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kavita Kosh (September 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Nearlyevil665 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kavita Kosh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kavita Kosh, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

nearlyevil 665 09:35, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ArticleCreatorinEnglish! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! nearlyevil 665 09:35, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ram Prasad Tiwary

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ram Prasad Tiwary requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. JamesG5 (talk) 06:15, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, re your comment on my talk page, it's not my decision about this. An administrator will review it & make the call. The page as it exists doesn't explain why that job or person is significant. Also, you can reply to me here and I'll see it. When you reply to someone or comment on their page, you should sign your posts by typing ~~~~ at the end so it adds your name and a date/time stamp. JamesG5 (talk) 06:29, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@User:JamesG5 Okay so what I have to do does I have to add more references or what ArticleCreatorinEnglish (talk) 06:34, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, more sources are a good start, and some that explain why, in general, that JOB is significant would help as well. JamesG5(talk) 06:35, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@User:JamesG5 Sir, the job is the most powerful job in all district of India because the subject can quit any person from his job so the subject is the most powerful person in his district in his time

Speedy deletion of Ram Prasad Tiwary

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Ram Prasad Tiwary has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appeared to be about a real person or group of people that did not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:57, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Assistant District Inspector of School

The article Assistant District Inspector of School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No demonstration of notability per the general notability guideline.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:59, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Hello. Your recent edit to Dongergaon appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Either write the article first or provide reliable sources for verifiability per this guideline.
If you want more help, stop by the Teahouse or Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Scottyoak2 (talk) 08:11, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ram Prasad Tiwary (September 25)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Theroadislong (talk) 08:28, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:HARSH VARDHAN SHARMA "TARA" per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HARSH VARDHAN SHARMA "TARA". Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:19, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ArticleCreatorinEnglish (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I use VPN to proof that I use VPN is if you reply yes I can change my location from India to Washington to China so if reply yes I can change my current IP Address to proof that I use VPN and If I use VPN it means the blocked user also use my IP Address so can I change my IP Address to proof that I am not that blocked user ArticleCreatorinEnglish (talk) 12:28, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed sockpuppetry. You are not using a VPN. Yamla (talk) 12:50, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ArticleCreatorinEnglish (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

How I am not using VPN ArticleCreatorinEnglish (talk) 12:52, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Talk page access revoked. MER-C 18:46, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@User:Yamla How? I am not using VPN ArticleCreatorinEnglish (talk) 12:51, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) Suggestion: let's revoke TPA so that we need not waste more time on this trolling. Java Hurricane 16:22, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]