User talk:Arthfach/Archives/2009
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Arthfach. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I've had a go at cleaning up the above article. If you would like to have another look to see whether this affects your comments at the AfD that would be great. Cheers. Quantpole (talk) 10:12, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
why?
why does it need to be deleted? The Maxamillion sum up.--Jacobgreen35 (talk) 21:54, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
No, you were quite right to do the Google checks and then nominate it when they came up blank. I did the checks as well before deleting. The claim of a No. 1 hit in China is certainly a claim of importance, but WP:CSD#A7 requires a credible claim of importance, so it's a hoax, and out he goes. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 11:31, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you. There's a few occasions where I'm not sure if I should speedy nominate or just take it to AfD, and I'm glad to know I made the right judgement call in this case. :) Lithorien (talk) 17:03, 13 December 2009 (UTC)