User talk:Artexposure

Artexposure, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Artexposure! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:John A. Knudsen has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:John A. Knudsen. Thanks! Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 11:26, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Johannes,

Thank you for your comments. I greatly appreciate the input you have given me. I have tried to make the corrections you suggest. If there is any other changes you think I should make please let me know. Very Best, Artexposure Artexposure (talk) 22:08, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:John A. Knudsen has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:John A. Knudsen. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:36, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Theroadislong, I am new to creating pages in Wikipedia and greatly appreciate your input. I have made some changes by reducing hypertext links and tone down comments which are more promotional oriented. If you have additional suggestions I would appreciate them. Best Regards, Artexposure Artexposure (talk) 22:10, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John A. Knudsen (April 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Modussiccandi were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I have main two problems with this draft: 1) it does not consistently cite sources and 2) its tone is not appropriate for an encyclopaedia. Consider, for example, '[n]o matter where he was located he would always have a sketchbook in hand. He was often inspired by his surroundings and daily life of the people.' This would fit in a literary biography of this subject, but not in our neutral style of writing.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John A. Knudsen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:John A. Knudsen, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Modussiccandi (talk) 19:47, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John A. Knudsen has been accepted

John A. Knudsen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 17:18, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Ingenuity, Thanks very much for letting me know that my page has been approved! Also thank you for providing additional information for contributing in the future. Best Regards, Art Exposure Artexposure (talk) 22:16, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]