User talk:Art javier

Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist and topic subscriptions to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!

Miles Long

Articles have to meet notability requirements. They need to have material derived from reliable sources in an objective way without editorial comment. The material should be referenced in the article. This is an encyclopedia, not a PR platform. The deleted article was totally unsuitable in language, beginning, "Biography Porn star Miles Long has got more going for him than just one of the industry's best names. He's a likable hunk who toiled for long years in the background" etc. Please click the links given here to read the policies. I suggest you study other articles to see how they are written. See also guidelines on dealing with conflict of interest. You may wish to post at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Pornography to get some specialist edtitor input. Ty 11:15, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sign

As a courtesy to other editors, it is a Wikipedia guideline to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, and WikiProject pages. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and the date will then be automatically added along with a timestamp when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). For further info, read Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. Ty 11:16, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources

Just to be clear, I removed a bunch of the info from the Miles Long article because the info was poorly sourced. You should really have a read of Wikipedia:Reliable sources. IMDb isn't a reliable source for much of anything except filmographies. Producers of films normally add their cast to the film listing but the rest of it doesn't have enough fact checking. So things like birth dates, locations, and other biographical data should be sourced from somewhere else. And as far as wikiporno goes... Well, "wiki-anything" should normally be avoided. Why? Because anyone can add info to a wiki. Just like here. If the wiki provides a reliable source, use that source and not the wiki. Dismas|^(talk) 20:04, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There were six hours between the time that I posted this and when you left a message on my talk page asking me what I feel I've already answered with the above question. Is there something I've said that you don't understand? Dismas|^(talk) 03:34, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I have changed the sourcing for the award nominations in question. What is the easiest way to provide a photo for posting in the photo section?

Photo can be found here:

http://www.imdb.com/media/rm1283232000/nm0519117

Thanks for your help as I believe only a moderator can make the Picture submission

Art Javier— Preceding unsigned comment added by Art javier (talk • contribs)

First, thanks for fixing the sources in the article.

Second, please sign your posts to talk pages as you were asked above. It is a courtesy to other editors in order to more easily tell who said what. You can sign your posts by putting four tildes at the end of your comments. It should look like this: ~~~~

Third, we don't have moderators here. We have editors like you and me. Then there are administrators who are one step above that. Above that are other positions/titles/etc but these are the main two.

And finally, we can't use that image. Not as it stands at least. That image belongs to someone. Whoever holds the copyright of the image. That's usually the photographer but it could be Long's company or Long himself. If we start using it without their permission, then we are violating that copyright. In order to use that specific image, you would have to get whoever owns it to release the image under a free license (e.g. Creative Commons, or public domain). Probably the easiest thing to do would be to write to Long, his manager, or production company and politely ask for a free image that we can use. Their note of permission would have to be sent to Wikipedia or one of the admins. You can find a lot more info about this at WP:FAIRUSE and Wikipedia:Example requests for permission. Dismas|^(talk) 04:21, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nikki Phoenix, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Model (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help! I see what you mean and will be more specific next time on the links! Art javier (talk) 19:14, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nikki Phoenix for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nikki Phoenix is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikki Phoenix until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Morbidthoughts (talk) 23:23, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited XRCO Award, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Evil Angel and Brad Armstrong (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited XBIZ Award, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brad Armstrong (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nikki Phoenix

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nikki Phoenix, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 21:14, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Nikki Phoenix (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to 21 and Over

TABU Ultra Lounge (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to 21 and over

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nikki Phoenix

Hi,

I can understand your frustration. Sometimes, actions can seem odd and arbitrary to someone who isn't well-versed in Wikipedia's procedures. Let me first say one thing: the argument that you've found other articles that don't seem to meet the notability guideline is not very helpful to your case. There is a short-hand phrase for this: other crap does exist. Basically, yes, those other articles you've found should be deleted. Wikipedia's system is inherently flexible, so sometimes articles survive with less scrutiny than should be allowed. This is not a reason to apply lax standards to all articles. Unfortunately, because Nikki Phoenix has been through AfD before, the article will draw more attention, and will need to meet a quality standard to ensure it remains.

I looked over the article from last year before I made the most recent deletion, and didn't see any new information likely to change the outcome of a new AfD discussion. However, it does make a difference to me that you cared enough to follow up, and you did so in a friendly way. I'd be happy to undelete the article, and refer it to a new AfD discussion. The problem is that, honestly, I don't believe it will survive the discussion. Until a major award is actually won, I don't see the likelihood of a different result. From the point of view of the article's long-term success, it might be best to wait until after the awards are handed out, and to root for Ms. Phoenix to win one. Best wishes, Xoloz (talk) 01:45, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I do think it would be wise to compose a new article focussed on non-pornographic work. You should realize that Wikipedia is bombarded daily by juvenile hoaxes and vandalism concerning pornography. While this does not apply to your article, which is serious and dilligently sourced, the net effect of this flood of childish material is to make editors more skeptical of pornographic content in general. To help you, I will move the last draft of your article on Ms. Phoenix to your sandbox, where you may work on editing it as you wish. When you feel the article is ready, you may advise me (or another admin) for an opinion on the likelihood that the article meets Wikipedia's quality standards.

I do apologize for the failure of my fellow admin to respond to you previously. Please understand that 99% of Wikipedia's admins (including me) are strictly volunteers, attending to Wikipedia in our spare time. It may well be that the other administrator is simply pre-occupied by his/her "day job". Best wishes, Xoloz (talk) 18:57, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the kind words, and I'm sorry that your prior experiences in the Wikipedia community have been unfriendly. This also may be related to the area in which you've chosen to edit. "Adult entertainment", as a category, attracts more vandals than any other. Additionally, it goes without saying that a certain percentage of any population will consider such content less than "respectable", and react to it negatively. Still, if you know where to look, there are plenty of friendly editors around. Check out the teahouse or the village pump for friendly conversations related to the encyclopedia.

Experienced editors apply for adminship at a special forum, requests for adminship. There are currently 1,416 of us, of varying levels of activity. The job is tedious, and often involves interacting with the most quarrelsome editors on the site, so the rate of "burnout" is quite high. Since admins are human, and routinely deal with problematic editors, sometimes they lose perspective and treat newcomers as potential problems, rather than potential friends. This is against policy, but it can happen. My point is that it is best to treat every editor with sympathy. Everyone here is a volunteer, and everyone here is capable of having a bad day. I remind myself of this on hourly basis, whenever I edit, and it keeps me from losing my cool. Best wishes, Xoloz (talk) 20:05, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of X-Worx

The article X-Worx has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indications of notability or significance; a WP:PROMO article. Significant RS coverage cannot be found. Notability is not inherited from other entities such as Miles Long.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:21, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of X-Worx

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello. A tag has been placed on X-Worx requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:12, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of X-Worx for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article X-Worx is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/X-Worx until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:25, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Nikki Phoenix

Hi, I'm Devopam. Art javier, thanks for creating Nikki Phoenix!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Article has potential and passess WP:PORNBIO. Need recommended improvements in order to make it a good read.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Devopam (talk) 13:31, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

COI warning

Hello, Art javier. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Nikki Phoenix, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. You also need to take great care in assuring that you comply with Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 00:01, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is not a conflict to have uploaded a picture years ago that I had rights to and that I have permission from the celebrity for. I also did not put up this page again either someone else did. Simply making an effort to link sources after the page has specific info and links taken down with better ones isn't a COI thanks! It is, however, edit warring that The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. is repeatedly engaged in with numerous other editors. I will most likely cease being part of the community again, since my time is better spent doing other things instead of having editors make false statements, and delete work that has been meticulously cited with great time and effort. That is not being an Editor, it is simply being a Deletor, and as I have said on the detailed polite message on his talk page, is not in the spirit of what wikipedia is about. How this repeated back in forth benefits anyone, since he has yet to even respond, is baffling.Art javier (talk) 01:14, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, You will be HAPPY to note, YOU ARE WRONG, the Photo has been RESTORED BY OTRS and is BACK UP ON WIKI EVERYWHERE. :)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Nikki_Phoenix_(RT_SF9A0489-cropped-small).jpg

Nomination of Nikki Phoenix for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nikki Phoenix is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikki Phoenix (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:55, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Art javier. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Art javier. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Art javier. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Miles Long, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AAIA. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]