User talk:Arranox

License tagging for Image:GoodCharlotte 004.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:GoodCharlotte 004.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:06, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:GOod charlotte.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:GOod charlotte.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:05, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Azn sensation

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Azn sensation, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Rick Block (talk) 02:58, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:AvengedSevenfoldPromotional2005.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:AvengedSevenfoldPromotional2005.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:08, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Johnny Christ.jpg listed for deletion

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Johnny Christ.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 08:17, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:GoodCharlotte_004.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:GoodCharlotte_004.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. cohesion 00:58, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

April 2007

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Avenged Sevenfold. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Gwernol 18:24, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

May 2007

Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Avenged Sevenfold, you will be blocked from editing. Gwernol 14:16, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The edit summary on this edit is highly inappropriate. Please read Wikipedia's policy on personal attacks. If you continue to use such inflammatory and offensive language you may be blocked for disruption. Gwernol 14:17, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for personal attacks

Your recent edit to Talk:Avenged Sevenfold was entirely unacceptable. It appears you are unable to comment in a civil manner. You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for 24 hours. When you return, please temper your language and contribute in a positive manner. Please read our policy on personal attacks and restrict your comments to the content of articles, not the contributors. If you wish to contest this block, you may do so by adding {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of this page. Gwernol 12:29, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop with the personal attacks in your edit summaries, such as "ignorant fools". You have already been blocked for this once. If you continue you will be blocked again, for a longer period. Please stop and engage in civilized discussion instead of attacking others. Gwernol 15:02, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edit to User:Inhumer

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. -- Gogo Dodo 08:05, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ignoring requests to provide sources

This concerns your edit here[1]:

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. This is especially important when dealing with biographies of living people, but applies to all Wikipedia articles. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add your reference to the article. Thank you. Hoponpop69 (talk) 19:01, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]