User talk:Arr45678

Welcome!

Hello, Arr45678! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{Ping|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 18:21, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

September 2015

Hello, I'm Salazzo. I noticed that you recently removed some content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Salazzo (talk) 09:24, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Former accounts?

Hi, I'm wondering if you've had any former accounts on Wikipedia and if so, what those accounts are and why you've stopped using them. While having multiple active accounts can be acceptable under some circumstances (see WP:SOCKLEGIT), using multiple accounts on the same article or using other accounts when one is blocked for any reason is not acceptable and can lead to you being blocked. You've got a similar username to a couple of other accounts and I'm close to requesting a check for sock puppets. Any explanation would be appreciated. Ravensfire (talk) 16:33, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your answer. I'm guessing you didn't have an e-mail setup for that account so you can't use the Forgot My Password option on the login page. When something like that happens, please add a note to your user page explaining the situation and linking the two accounts. It may also be helpful to contact an admin using the {{Admin help}}, explain the situation and see about getting the first account blocked. Since you don't have the password for that account, it's a good practice to have it blocked. Thanks. Ravensfire (talk) 18:14, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Arr45678, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Arr45678! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:20, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Hello, I'm HitroMilanese. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Kis Kisko Pyaar Karoon, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hitro talk 21:07, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Kis Kisko Pyaar Karoon, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Hitro talk 21:23, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

HI :)

Now u have added references also The source which is given in critical reception itself proves that the reviews are mixed Hello, It's not an automatic message, I am an alive human being. Why are you adding the contents again and again that is being reverted. This reference is included in the article. It say's this flick has negative review. If you want to add something different then add equally reliable reference to this article. Hitro talk 21:27, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Materialscientist (talk) 10:19, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

POV editing

Hi, your edit here is problematic, specifically the statement Even after getting negative reviews from the critics the film opened to great box office collections surprising many. Content must we written from a neutral point of view, and should not contain promotional and subjective expressions like "great" and vague weasel wording like "surprised many". We should be presenting facts, not opinions. The place for opinions is in the critical response section. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:04, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Actually it's not my statement it's from a news article...but i'll change it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arr45678 (talk • contribs)

Statements about opinion need to be presented as quotations and directly attributed to the person making the statement, not casually presented as a fact. For instance, in a review, we would write:

John Doe of 123 Magazine described the film as "pretentious, moody and not worth the money."^[1]

We wouldn't say:

The film is pretentious, moody and not worth the money.^[1]

In the case of the "great" box office "surprising many", the information is of little real value and should be avoided entirely. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:15, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Arr45678 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did so by adding a source later n replacing the information with the latest updates plzz help my intention wasn't bad

Decline reason:

On at least three different occasions pointed out above you changed information based on a reliable source to something else. You can't seriously claim that the amount grossed on the opening weekend would significantly increase after the weekend is over. Huon (talk) 17:08, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Kis Kisko Pyaar Karoon. Diff: This change you made is not consistent with the existing reference.This change you made is also not consistent with the existing reference. And this change you made is not consistent with the existing reference. That's three out of your last five edits at Kis Kisko Pyaar Karoon that are not consistent with the references. This looks an awful lot like vandalism to me. Please cut it out. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:05, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 23:51, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Previous account

Hi, what was your previous account pls? There's some speculation, so it would help clear that up, regards. Widefox; talk 16:41, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for the continued addition of unsourced information to biography articles despite ample warning and a previous block for the same behaviour. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:09, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]