User talk:ArmijaDonetsk

Welcome!

Hello, ArmijaDonetsk, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was 2014 pro-Russian protests in Ukraine, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or any other editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One firm rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! RGloucester — ☎ 17:51, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You violated process for link deletion [1] and reported me/my name behind my back [2]. Also you make allegations without providing evidence. ArmijaDonetsk (talk) 18:21, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have suspicions. The administrators will establish whether they are warranted or not. That's the point of the noticeboard. RGloucester — ☎ 21:22, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArmijaDonetsk, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi ArmijaDonetsk! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:07, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Please do not attack other editors, as you did on User talk:RGloucester. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. RGloucester — ☎ 16:02, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

HYPOCRITE! See, how you attacked me "I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was 2014 pro-Russian protests in Ukraine, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest.". ArmijaDonetsk (talk) 16:13, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That isn't an attack. I have nothing against you. However, policy says that usernames can't give the impression that one is editing as an organisation. Yours does, however, you were cleared in that regard, so there is nothing to worry about. RGloucester — ☎ 16:15, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I also "have nothing against you". If a name that may represent a group is not allowed, why was I allowed to keep it? Random policy implementation? What about "RGloucester" - could also be a group, maybe a hip-hop music group. ArmijaDonetsk (talk) 16:23, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at WP:AN/I regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. —RGloucester — ☎ 16:35, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Your edits at Annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation‎ have been quite unacceptably tendentious. Moreover, you have been revert-warring to keep them in the article, instead of discussing.

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to Eastern Europe. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you inappropriately edit pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.

Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:48, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re-Warning: User:Future Perfect at Sunrise - You are not saying the truth. I have been discussing, see the talk page of that article. ArmijaDonetsk (talk) 18:08, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Charta of the United Nations

A tag has been placed on Charta of the United Nations, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo, or other unlikely search term.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you believe that there is a reason to keep the redirect, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Toddy1 (talk) 20:10, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not recreate typographical errors. Charta is a typographic error. The word is Charter.--Toddy1 (talk) 08:28, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is even a template for such situations Template:R from misspelling, included on 1000s of pages - so, what do you want from me? Working by your subjective rules? Go away. ArmijaDonetsk (talk) 23:19, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Accession of Crimea to the Russian Federation

Hello,

I have restored the redirect per WP:REDUNDANTFORK. The best way to describe the formal legal process of Crimea's transition from the Ukraine to Russia is in a section of an already existing article such as Annexation _of_Crimea_by_the_Russian_Federation#Admission_treaty_and_aftermath or Political_status_of_Crimea_and_Sevastopol#Stances. Cheers, ^walk victor falk^talk 22:36, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Accession_of_Crimea_to_the_Russian_Federation ArmijaDonetsk (talk) 22:46, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

First, a point of process: it is considered bad etiquette to edit other editors' comments [3] per WP:REFACTOR. To the matter itself: attempts at circumventing the result of the WP:RM won't succeed. You are wasting your efforts, this is hardly the first that wikipedia encounters highly politicised editing, and one of the first things any self-respecting editor should do is respect WP:Consensus. Please try to build consensus for your point of view, and do not engage in creating wp:povforks.

Regards, ^walk victor falk^talk 23:09, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Flag of the Donetsk People's Republic

Hello, ArmijaDonetsk. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Flag of the Donetsk People's Republic, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Dudel250 (talk) 03:32, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Flag of the Donetsk People's Republic for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Flag of the Donetsk People's Republic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flag of the Donetsk People's Republic until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Martin Berka (talk) 18:30, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Unish may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* 1) The IPA ɡ is U+0261 from the IPA Extensions, not the g from the ISO basic Latin alphabet.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:26, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ISO basic Latin alphabet

Thank you for experimenting with the page ISO basic Latin alphabet on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. -- AnonMoos (talk) 07:59, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Unish, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Digraph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:48, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at 2014 pro-Russian unrest in Ukraine. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. RGloucester — ☎ 14:38, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Львівське (говорити) 19:17, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Talk:2014 pro-Russian unrest in Ukraine. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. RGloucester — ☎ 19:31, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at WP:AN/I regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. —RGloucester — ☎ 16:35, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently another discussion at WP:AN/I regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.--Toddy1 (talk) 22:15, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

So, you inform me of that discussion that takes place without me. Why? ArmijaDonetsk (talk) 23:17, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Topic ban

Despite earlier warnings, you have continued to aggressively push a tendentious political agenda in articles related to Crimea and Ukraine. Under the authority of the WP:Discretionary sanctions rules regarding Eastern European topics (WP:ARBEE), I am therefore topic-banning you from all edits relating to Crimea, the Ukrainian conflict and Ukrainian-Russian relations for a period of one year. Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:49, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just adding a link to WP:TBAN so you have have a look at what being topic banned means. Also per the discretionary sanctions procedures you need to be informed of the appeals process which is detailed here. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:54, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Where did I "aggressively push a tendentious political agenda"? ArmijaDonetsk (talk) 22:54, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for violating a topic ban, as you did at Talk:2014 pro-Russian unrest in Ukraine. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Drmies (talk) 23:04, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am opposing any POV pushing. I am working against bias. I am working for presenting a neutral point of view. I am working against US/NATO/EU POV pushing. Is working for NPOV forbidden? Why do you block me? Is Wikipedia not aiming for NPOV? ArmijaDonetsk (talk) 23:12, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You were banned from the topic of Crimea and Ukraine. You made an edit in that area. You were blocked. The blocking template above indicates how you may request an unblock. The above message by Callanecc indicates how you may appeal the topic ban. But as long as that topic ban is in place you may not edit in this topic area. Drmies (talk) 23:25, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia censorship! You can only edit ukrainian-related articles if you follow the ukrainian ultranationalistic POV, if not just forget it, sad but true...--HC PUNXKID 15:53, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 01:12, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 02:19, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]