User talk:ArmadilloFromHell

This user may have left Wikipedia. ArmadilloFromHell has not edited Wikipedia since February 28, 2007. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 7 days are automatically archived to User talk:ArmadilloFromHell/Archive 07/Month Nov. Sections without timestamps are not archived.

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Please post new messages at the bottom of the list

Messages posted at the top will usually be deleted without a reply

Sign all posts - see Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages - it makes communication clear as to who said what and when.

User pages are not user templates, so they do not belong in user template categories.

Archives

/Archive 06/Month August
/Archive 06/Month Sep
/Archive 06/Month Oct
/Archive 06/Month Nov
/Archive 06/Month Dec
/Archive 07/Month Jan

Nachmansohn article

Hi, thanks for your advice. I'm a first time contributor and I'm having a bit of trouble adding references to the stub; how exactly does one do this? Or is there a useful page to explain it, because I can't seem to locate the details . Also, I intend to write more on Nachmansohn but not until I'm finished with a research project on his life; is it possible that the stub will be deleted before I can add more? Thanks for all of your help, - NatalieM (talk · contribs) 14:06, November 6, 2006

Business Card

Hey, before revert anything, take a second to have a look on previous versions. See the versions edited by Richmeister, FayssalF, SiobhanHansa. I require an apology. tontot — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tontot (talk • contribs)

Please sign posts on talk pages Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages

Apology for what? In my opinion it is not acceptable in that article and I removed it. --ArmadilloFromHellGateBridge

If this is ONLY your opinion, why don't you discuss on the talk page first? Want to get another star for fighting spams?

I'm a wikinewb but I'm a Photoshop expert

What should I do? I don't know much about Wikipedia but I can handle very well w/ Photoshop (I use CS2) Just wanna contribute to Wikipedia... Help me to help U. Contact Me!

Change Username

ArmadilloFromHell → ArmadilloDeanCenter

Current name: ArmadilloFromHell (talk • contribs)
Requested name: ArmadilloDeanCenter (change username)
Reason: I think your username might not have a profanity word. Is it okay if you change your username (and your namestamp)?

Happy First Day of Spring!

Just wishing you a wonderful First Day of Spring {{subst:CURRENTYEAR}}! ~~~~

If you live in the Southern Hemisphere and are entering the season of Autumn not Spring then I wish you a happy First Day of Autumn {{subst:CURRENTYEAR}}!
To spread this message to others, add {{subst:First Day Of Spring}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

WikiProject Law Enforcement Barnstar Proposal Poll

Hello there ArmadilloFromHell,

We here at Wikiproject Law Enforcement are currently in the process of deciding wither or not to make this WikiProject Law Enforcement's official Barnstar award. Being that you are a member of Wikiproject Law Enforcement, we are humbly asking you to voice your opinion here about our new Barnstar.

Thank You and All the Best, Mifter (talk) 20:33, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

--Mifter (talk) 20:33, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:ArmadilloFromHell/List of ambulance manufacturers

User:ArmadilloFromHell/List of ambulance manufacturers, a page you created, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:ArmadilloFromHell/List of ambulance manufacturers and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:ArmadilloFromHell/List of ambulance manufacturers during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. ╟─TreasuryTag (talk ╬ contribs)─╢ 11:46, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You were extremely disruptive during your time as a Wikipedia editor and I can't say you'll be missed. Wikipedia will benefit in the long run now that you're no longer here. --91.85.182.208 (talk) 17:38, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello ArmadilloFromHell! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 272 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Bronwen Hughes - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 18:32, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Survey for new page patrollers

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello ArmadilloFromHell! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wiki Media Foundation at 11:16, 25 October 2011 (UTC).[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:16, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New deal for page patrollers

Hi ArmadilloFromHell,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Steel Tec

The article Steel Tec has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies)'s requirement for products. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:07, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]