User talk:Arkam Knight

Welcome!

Hello, Arkam Knight, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 20:54, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Gotitbro (talk) 17:23, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vedic Sanskrit

While attested Vedic is indeed very close to the Prakrits, it is also accepted that the Middle Indo-Aryan languages do preserve some features not found even in the Rigveda, among other things (such as the merging of /l/ and /r/ as /r/ in Vedic, but /l/ appearing later in MIA languages and Classical Sanskrit, resulting in Vedic rēḍʰi but Classical lēḍʰi). As such, MIA languages and Classical Sanskrit are usually considered to descend from unattested Old Indo-Aryan dialects parallel to Vedic. If you are still adamant that they do descend from attested Vedic, please provide a reliable source that supports that claim and can explain these discrepancies. Best, 2601:642:4780:6B0:4909:4440:CB55:AFEE (talk) 17:24, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please don't say you "fixed a typo" when you didn't. 2601:642:4780:6B0:4909:4440:CB55:AFEE (talk) 17:25, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@2601:642:4780:6B0:4909:4440:CB55:AFEE Thank you for your reply, actually I have proofs for everything that you mentioned, I mean I have proofs of "Prakrits" derived from Vedic Sanskrit.. cuz the Sanskrit we see now isn't actually Sanskrit from the ancient times, at all.. The Mittani Sanskrit, which we call a mysterious Indo-aryan language of Mittani, was a dialect of Vedic Sanskrit, as seen in the Mittani inscriptions, cuz a particular culture can't have 2 primary languages at once.. Mittani Sanskrit had "Za", "combined consonant word" and even "zha" in it, as attested in The Mittani inscriptions.. Medha becomes "Mazdha", equivalent to "Mezdha" of Old avestan and Old Persian..

But since I am new to Wikipedia, I can't access "The Wikipedia Library", so tell me now, what should I do now? how would o site proofs here? Arkam Knight (talk) 18:11, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@2601:642:4780:6B0:4909:4440:CB55:AFEE how should I cite evidences of my claims? my account is still not eligible to access the wikipedia library Arkam Knight (talk) 18:13, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As we define it, Vedic Sanskrit is not an all-encompassing term for all pre-Classical Old Indo-Aryan dialects. Mitanni-Aryan is therefore not considered true Vedic Sanskrit, and neither are the dialects that gave rise to the Prakrits and Classical Sanskrit.

Oh, and you do not need the Wikipedia Library to cite sources. See WP:CITE for advice on how to cite sources. 2601:642:4780:6B0:892E:CC18:669A:7551 (talk) 19:39, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]