User talk:Arijeet Patil

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Arijeet Patil! Thank you for your contributions. I am Jaaron95 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! JAaron95 ^Talk 14:30, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join WP:RRTF

Hello, Arijeet Patil! I'd like to invite you to join the Rick Riordan Task Force (formerly the "Percy Jackson" Task Force) of WikiProject Novels. We work to improve articles related to Rick Riordan and his books. You have made some very substantial edits to List of characters in mythology novels by Rick Riordan and Percy Jackson, among other articles. Although most of your edits simply removed wikilinks, your dedication is appreciated. It would be beneficial to all if you considered working within the task-force, so that you and other editors could coordinate your efforts and avoid accidentally undoing each others' work. (I have seen it happen before.) Please, check out our project page or contact me to learn more! -- 2ReinreB2 (talk) 20:04, 6 February 2017 (UTC) [reply]
*Please note that membership is open only to full users. If you currently edit with an IP address, please consider creating an account today! We would love to have you.

February 2017

Hello, I'm AdventurousSquirrel. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Draco Malfoy, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Please note that the verifiability policy mandates that unsourced material that has been challenged, such as by a "fact" tag, or by its removal, may not be added back without a reliable, published source being cited for the content, using an inline citation. The cited source must clearly support the material as presented in the article, and the burden is on the person wishing to keep in the disputed material. So if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so, following these requirements! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 05:21, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm AdventurousSquirrel. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Death Eater without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 05:28, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 14 February

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the List of supporting Harry Potter characters page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:15, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Places in Harry Potter, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:02, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Boomer Vial. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Death Eater without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball} 06:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Death Eater, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 08:09, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Death Eater. Serols (talk) 08:10, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Death Eater, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Twitbook space tube 11:42, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 11:46, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Death Eater to List of supporting Harry Potter characters (your addition has since been removed). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. If you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:14, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Order of the Phoenix (fictional organisation).

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 02:34, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Places in Harry Potter. - Happysailor ^(Talk) 16:07, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to List of characters in mythology novels by Rick Riordan

Hi there, Arijeet Patil. Just letting you know why I reverted your edit to List of characters in mythology novels by Rick Riordan. This is the second time you've attempted to remove the character Percy Jackson from this list, presumably because he has his own page. I see your point. However, he still belongs on the comprehensive list of characters - albeit with an abbreviated description. We want readers with no background on the series to be able to find a list of all the characters in one place. The same is true for Carter Kane. If you still feel that the entry for Jackson on the full list is inappropriate, you may try shortening his entry somewhat. You may also leave a post on Talk:List of characters in mythology novels by Rick Riordan or my own talk page if you'd like to discuss this matter further. Thanks! -- 2ReinreB2 (talk) 18:54, 27 February 2017 (UTC) (Please either leave a {{Talkback}} on my talk page or {{ping}} me if you respond here.)[reply]

@Arijeet Patil: -- Once again, Arijeet Patil, I have restored the page to its previous version. I abbreviated the section; it's now half the length of any other main character's section. PLEASE, read and respond to this message before you take any further action. I have no desire to get in an edit war with you or take this before arbitration. -- 2ReinreB2 (talk) 06:02, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Arijeet Patil and long-running pruning on young adult fiction". Thank you. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:14, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for generally disruptive editing and an apparent refusal to communicate. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:56, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|reason= I sincerely apologise for any disruptive edits, errors or trouble I've caused. I didn't intend to make the edits disruptive. I thought I was only removing overlinking in [[Order of the Phoenix (Harry Potter)]] on the [[Marauders (Harry Potter)]], [[James Potter (character)]], [[Sirius Black]], [[Remus Lupin]] and [[Peter Pettigrew]], and that I was only correcting the naming structure of the characters. I apologise for removing the point about [[Aberforth Dumbledore]] leaving the order, because I thought it would be miner information. My removals and copying to [[List of Supporting Harry Potter Characters]] of some characters on [[Death Eater]] were only because the characters in question, like [[Severus Snape]] (who also has his own page), [[Regulus Black]] and [[Lucius Malfoy]] betrayed [[Voldemort]] in the end with Snape having played an important part as a double-agent for the good side, and because [[Draco Malfoy]] also has his own page and turned against Voldemort in the end along with his family - besides, there was no text in his section. I apologise for removing [[Augustus Rookwood]] by mistake in the process of removing Lucius and for removing the [[Ministry of Magic]] from [[Places in Harry Potter]] because it has its own page. I also apologise for refusing to communicate, as I am a schoolchild of 13 and had my 7th grade final exams going on, with my friends coming to my house in the early part of my vacation. I will be more active on Wikipedia from now on. what should I try to avoid while editing? [[User:Arijeet Patil|Percy Jackson]] ([[User talk:Arijeet Patil#top|talk]]) 06:22, 4 March 2017 (UTC)}}.

Denied You can consider this summarily denied due to the disruptive editing of other user's comments here on your talk page while blocked. See below for details on how to proceed from here. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:14, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continuing the same sort of behavior here on your talk page even after being blocked. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:13, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Arijeet Patil (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #17762 was submitted on Mar 13, 2017 14:47:55. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 14:47, 13 March 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Arijeet Patil (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #18074 was submitted on Apr 19, 2017 10:46:32. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 10:46, 19 April 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Arijeet Patil (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #18135 was submitted on Apr 26, 2017 13:29:49. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 13:29, 26 April 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Arijeet Patil (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #18142 was submitted on Apr 27, 2017 06:47:17. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 06:47, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your emails

The reason your are blocked from making further appeals either here or via UTRS for the next 6 months is to 1) give yourself time to (hopefully) mature and 2) to prove to the community that you can abide by their standards by staying away for a specific amount of time and (perhaps) proving yourself elsewhere. See standard offer. Note also that accounts cannot be deleted; you can simply stop editing. Do not create additional accounts while blocked, however, as that will only delay any possible return.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:32, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Each time you evade your block the clock resets. The earliest you can appeal your block is December 5, 2017.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:29, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your email - you cannot edit Wikipedia under any account or IP as long as this account remains blocked. You, the individual sitting at the computer, is blocked from editing until such a time as the block is lifted no matter where you are editing from.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:52, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Again, regarding your emails, the reason your IP has a set limit on the block expiry is that we don't block IPs indefinitely. At some point your IP address will likely change so there is no benefit in blocking indefinitely. Since you still state that you don't understand what you are being told about being blocked I will again attempt to make it crystal clear: You can never edit Wikipedia under any account or IP unless and until you successfully appeal the block of this account. The only possible way you could achieve a successful appeal would be to follow the standard offer. --Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 15:39, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Arijeet Patil (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #19948 was submitted on Dec 05, 2017 06:52:19. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 06:52, 5 December 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Arijeet Patil (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #20198 was submitted on Dec 30, 2017 21:43:09. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 21:43, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]