User talk:Ariesartist1

Welcome!

Hi Ariesartist1! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 19:55, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to UNHhhh have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: UNHhhh was changed by Ariesartist1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.901202 on 2022-02-21T19:24:49+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:24, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

National varieties of English

Hello. In a recent edit to the page Kingsman: The Secret Service, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. DBaK (talk) 21:54, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry I reverted you here. I might of course be wrong (as I am at least 50% of the time: I just don't know which 50% it is) but it seemed to me that it had fairly strong national associations so we probably shouldn't be changing it around between BrE and AmE too much. I especially thought that licence to license, within the title of the review here, probably was not a great call. So I am not really here trying to tell you off, which would be silly and rude of me, but just to make sure that you know that WP:ENGVAR exists and that it has (sometimes complex) implications for our approach to some articles! Thanks, all good wishes, and happy editing. DBaK (talk) 22:01, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ordinary Monsters (novel) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ordinary Monsters (novel), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – Pbrks ^(t • c) 17:37, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ordinary Monsters (novel) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ordinary Monsters (novel). Thanks! asilvering (talk) 04:29, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ordinary Monsters has been accepted

Ordinary Monsters, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TipsyElephant (talk) 19:33, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gilmore Guys

Please see WP:NOT. A hundred and fifty eight thousand characters long episode listing is not Wikipedia is for. If you're into Gilmore Guys, feel free to start your own fanpage. It does not belong on Wikipedia. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 21:33, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't start that exhaustive list, looking back at prior edits, it seems that several people contributed. According to your profile, you have admiration and respect for people expanding subjects on their interests; what's so harmful about a fan podcast having a single devoted, extensive wikipedia page? Other podcasts have extensive pages, what's the harm in one about a Tv show recap podcast Ariesartist1 (talk) 03:08, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:LONGTIME, WP:EFFORT, WP:NOHARM and WP:WHATABOUTX are not reasons to keep this stuff. Again, that's not Wikipedia is for. There's no guideline that says "articles about podcasts can be devoted and exhaustive". WP:SIZERULE says every 1,000 characters is 1 kB. >100 kB articles should be split. What I took out was ~ 158 kB of characters alone. If I'd take that gigantic chunk of WP:FANCRUFT material and create a new article, it would be deleted swiftly as it is unsourced, trivial and unencyclopedic (but it's shitty to edit disruptively, just to make a WP:POINT). From what I can tell from your edits, you've been here since early this year. Please familiarise yourself with Wikipedia guidelines. I'll leave it up to you to revert your own last edit. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 05:37, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ariesartist1, it's been over 10 days. I see you've been editing again recently. Would you kindly undo your revert? I've given plenty of valid and solid arguments why the 158k chunk of trivial episode guide material doesn't belong in the article. What I forgot to mention before, if you want to reinstate unsourced material the WP:BURDEN is on you to add sources. Otherwise I'm up for a request for comment, if you want to hear another opinion on the matter. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 18:08, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ariesartist1, you've been active recently so I assume you've at least seen my messages. I'll undo your revert once more. If you disagree, please start a WP:RFC on the article talk page. Happy editing. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 11:22, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Ariesartist1! Your additions to Babel, or the Necessity of Violence have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 00:14, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]