User talk:Ariel c nunag

Dipolog Airport

Regarding your recent edits to Dipolog Airport please provide your sources before editing such articles per Wikipedia:Verifiability and please do not copy the works from others. Happy Editing! -chris^_^ 21:07, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Once again I am reminding you to provide your sources before editing Dipolog Airport once again if you won't provide your sources your edits will be reverted once again. -chris^_^ 19:37, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dipolog Airport

"Thanks for the reminder. I already did cited my source at their respective links. Additional informations are added based on interviews and documentary evidence i obtained from concerned government officials. NOt all documentary sources can be found online, and some are quoted from copyrighted materials I read which are also the source of those links which are also the basis of those news items. Best efforts are made to trace the presence of this documents on the web as source of information for transparency. There are still plenty of additional information to add. I myself is a government official who happens to live and stay in Dipolog. I also happen to know what copyright law is. That's why I know what I'm talking about. I don't hide my name either. Best regards."

Once again I revised your edits to Dipolog Airport, it does cite the sources, but when you read it, it is like a press article which is not allowed in Wikipedia. For more information see WP:NOT. Unless you rewrite your edits to more of an encyclopedia article I will not revise it. But if it still reads as a press article I will revise it again. Happy Editing! -chris^_^ 00:58, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am reminding you once again, that I revised your edits to Dipolog Airport, because it reads like a press article, which is against WP:NOT. Please do not edit it again unless you make it like an encyclopedia article, not like a press article. Happy editing! -chris^_^ 20:21, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I already cleaned-up the article page and removed unnecessary information. Please do not return the unnecessary information I removed. Happy editing! -chris^_^ 20:01, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Dc-3 usmag dpl.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dc-3 usmag dpl.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:07, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Dipologseal.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dipologseal.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --00:57, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:PI-C91.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:PI-C91.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MilborneOne (talk) 14:14, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Pal PI-C771.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Pal PI-C771.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MilborneOne (talk) 14:19, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Pal PI-C5.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Pal PI-C5.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MilborneOne (talk) 14:45, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New Bacolod and Iloilo airports

The 2 airports are actually of international standards per news reports and sources in the article. But the two airports are not classified by the government as international airports because it still does not serve international flights as of now. While in the case of Kalibo and Puerto Princesa airports, they are also of international standards, but there has been no official name change yet, so the name international is not in the article's name. pikdig (talk) 08:55, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you could please check List of airports in the Philippines ILO and BCD is classified as domestic airports, while PPS and KLO is classified with international airports. But the names would remain Iloilo International Airport, Bacolod International Airport, Puerto Princesa Airport, and Kalibo Airport until an official name change has been announced. pikdig (talk) 12:29, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I consider you bring up this article with WP:AIRPORTS not with me. pikdig (talk) 03:39, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since your the one who wants to change the name of the article, you should be the one to approach WP:AIRPORTS, not WP:AVIATION. As WP:AIRPORTS, a branch of WP:AVIATION is the main body overseeing airports. All you have to do is start a talk section on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Airports, just like on an ordinary user talk page. A peer review is not the one required here, as a peer review is the one used to re-rate an article. You should ask for a consensus not a peer review. pikdig (talk) 13:11, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate Image:Old Parking Area.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Old Parking Area.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Old Parking Area.jpg is a duplicate of an already existing article, category or image.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Old Parking Area.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 11:41, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Zest Airways

Please stop reverting the edits on Zest Airways as the current version is much better, for it is outlined properly. And for the fleet, per the Zest Airways website, they don't have LET-410s in service anymore. pikdig (talk) 14:05, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Sky Harbor's reply to your opinions, in his talk page: User talk:Sky Harbor. pikdig (talk) 04:55, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An exciting opportunity to improve yourself!

As a member of the Aviation WikiProject or one of its subprojects, you may be interested in testing your skills in the Aviation Contest! I created this contest, not to pit editor against editor, but to promote article improvement and project participation and camraderie. Hopefully you will agree with its usefulness. Sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here. The first round of the contest may not start until September 1st-unless a large number of editors signup and are ready to compete immediately! Since this contest is just beginning, please give feedback here, or let me know what you think on my talkpage. - Trevor MacInnis ^contribs 16:50, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Vought F4U Corsair Dipolog Field.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Vought F4U Corsair Dipolog Field.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 16:02, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Dipolog orchid.jpg

The file File:Dipolog orchid.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]