Jump to content

User talk:arichnad/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5

WP:NPOV shortcut

Yeah. I didn't mean to do that. I have mistakened it for the WP:POV shortcut. Thanks for noticing my error. :) --Ineffable3000 04:10, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

speedy tagging

Hello! I saw your speedy tag on one article. FYI - little-known fact: G4 doesn't apply to stuff that was previously speedied, only stuff that was deleted through an XfD process. Thanks for tagging! --Fang Aili talk 19:18, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Just a thanks for your positive, level-headed, in-line-with-Wiki-policy contributions to TJHSST discussions. Thanks! KevinPuj 23:56, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

re: AfD

I was wondering why the debate was already created. The prod tag on the other band member still stands though. I have both on my watchlist, been keeping track of them for a while. Mr.Z-mantalk¢ 23:23, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Re:These edits

Hello Arichnad, there is not too much to explain, just a little bit of highly inappropriate fun. I figure that for every 1000 positive edits we can do one of those. I hope I didn't offend anyone.- Moshe Constantine Hassan Al-Silverburg | Talk 21:10, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Ernst

Yes I did as I am going to add the details today. I feel it easier to rid of the red links and then fill. I stated in many of the starter pages in the edit summary that they were starters. They won't reamin like that for long. Bear with me Cheers! Ernst Stavro Blofeld 12:34, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

I do feel the task less daunting if I have less red links to work with -I'm working on a period at a time e.g I am now working on late 1930s Argentine films. Each stub has the link and info box laid out and is categorized. THe next step will be to add cast and crew details and images like I have done to Los Caranchos de la Florida and Loco lindo. Then at a later date I hope the plot can be written in full into full length quality articles. The task is so enormous to cover world films!! that this way of doing it seems better for me. All the best Ernst Stavro Blofeld 13:10, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Eventually when the missing films are all stubbed on wikipedia I can attempt to begin writing every stub into full quality articles. I feel it important to lay out the boundaries first -it gives me a basis to work on. Ernst Stavro Blofeld 13:13, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Jeff Katz

Arihnad, I (gmss0205)have been doing the non-biased posts about Jeff Katz. I have in writing from him approval to post the info from the WBT site, as he is the rights holder (he wrote it). What do I need to provide to you to get that info back up. I also think once it is up, it should be locked, so that the person that keeps vandalizing the site can not get in there. If you need an email for me, let me know. Or, you can contact Jeff directly at jeffkatz@wbt.com and he will verify that he gave me approval to post it. Thanks for your help with this matter. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.105.195.2 (talk) 22:40, 26 February 2007 (UTC).

Hello gmss0205, I responded over here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Katz ~a (user • talk • contribs) 05:13, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Blaaze

Blaaze is an indian rapper who has made some of the first rap songs in the Indian Film Industry. I see no reason why the article should be deleted. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Adhishb (talk • contribs).

Well Blaaze has an IMDB page so I think he is significant enough to have an IMDB page.heres his IMDB page http://imdb.com/name/nm1830865/

Adhishb 00:32, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

advice

Thanks for the tip. You're very right. I'll abide by your suggestion.

ManfrenjenStJohn 19:39, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Branching off from the Sneakers Talk Page...

Nice to be working with you on the Sneakers (film) page. : )

I'm new as an editor (you knew that), but I've been interested in WikiP for ages. Can you tell me, or link me, so that I might understand what your role is? I mean, I get it to some extent... you're a shepherd for new editors like me. (I'm a systems guy, you can get as technical as you like in your response.) I've read your suggestions and your talk page and it's all been very helpful and informative. But what I'm missing is: What are your "magical powers", for (horrid) lack of a better metaphor. Do you have an assigned area of topics/interests? When and how did I show up on your radar so you could observe and help me? Was it when I entered your "airspace" by working on the Sneakers article?

Hungry for info. : )

Thanks! -- ManfrenjenStJohn 09:44, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Apex Clubs of Australia

The original content was inaccurate in that it used an old logo and did not contain a proper explanation of our ideals. It also stated that Clubs could select their gender mix. That is no longer the case and clubs can no longer dictate that they have a particular gender specification.

I will give another stab at adding salient material that does not offend, but not for a few days. I can see that one of our Youth Club members has added some material.

Thank you for your comments.

Graham Lancaster Glancaster 09:57, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Betacommand.

He is *still* doing this stuff! Should we take this to an RFC? --BenBurch 22:03, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

List of Star Trek Blueprints

"Jackilsfrm if this gets into an edit war let me know.". What do you mean? ~a (user • talk • contribs) 04:54, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Hey Arichnad....I just wanted Jackillsfrm to be aware that if the situation developed into an edit war to let me know and I would help him handle the situation through the proper protocols, rather than driving everyone nuts. Which I've seen happen all to often. Hope this answers your question. Shoessss 05:01, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Yep, that sounds fine. ~a (user • talk • contribs) 05:03, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
Well, it looks like somebody nominated this article for deletion. ~a (user • talk • contribs) 17:07, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

I have deleted the page I just do not feel that there is anything that I can do to make him happy, There are only so many hoops that I want to jump through. I will post this information somewhere else on the web, thanks for your time.

Point of note: I did not nominate the article for deletion. Don't blame me. ~a (user • talk • contribs) 18:12, 25 March 2007 (UTC)


♦LOL...are we getting Paranoid???? No I never blame anyone.....the final decision is not in mine or your hands...that's what is nice a Wikipedia. It is a consensus. Have a great day....and thanks for the heads-up Shoessss 18:18, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Deleting Ajitasaurus

I am fine with the page being deleted, but as I am new, how do I do that? Am I allowed to since I created the page? Thanks Avaron676 00:38, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Put {{db-owner}} on the top of it and an administrator will review the situation and probably go ahead and delete it for you - Alison☺ 04:40, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

{{DEFAULTSORT:{{PAGENAME}}}}

So, the default sort template you tagged my userpage with is what allows categories to assort pages via a default, rather than requiring [[Category:Whatever|Lastname, first]] as it used to be? I had heard that categories were default sorting, but I didn't know the mechanism. Am I groking it? Is there a Help page I can reference to clear things up? --mordicai. 21:40, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

  • If you put [[Category:Whatever]] it will sort you under U for User:Mordicai.
  • If you put [[Category:Whatever|Mordicai]] it will sort you under M for Mordicai.
  • {{DEFAULTSORT:{{PAGENAME}}}} just makes it so you don't have to put your name in every category. It changes the default sorting name from User:Mordicai to Mordicai.
Am I making any sense? ~a (user • talk • contribs) 21:52, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Yes, perfectly. As I said, I had heard that such a thing was the case, but not the mechanism of it. Just someone telling me that separating Lastname, firstname after the | wasn't necessary any longer. Good to have it cleared up. I also noticed you mucking about on your user page with the lowercase template, & nabbed that, so double thanks. --mordicai. 21:56, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Reverting

Hi, i noticed you reverted User:Geldo49's edit on Lü Bu at 23:21, 29 April 2007. i fully applaud your vigilance but i thought i'd just give you a gentle reminder to be more thorough when reverting. In the above case, Geldo49 made multiple edits in succession. Hence Undo will only revert his very last edit. i don't think he meant to vandalize, but i seem to notice an increasing number of vandals make multiple edits nowadays. We just need to be more careful. Cheers! :) --Plastictv 11:08, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Actually, I didn't think he was vandalizing at all and I'm still not positive he was. His edits are all unsourced, but not obvious vandalism. I saw Gelado49's multiple edits in succession before I used the Undo operation. I thought he knew the guy's birth year and he knew the guy died at the age of 43. I reverted the "He was only the age of 43" because it was unnecessary given the fact that 43 is a perfectly normal age to die at. When I revert vandalism I always label it as such. Also, it's unlike me to undo an edit without a description, like I did here; my fault. ~a (user • talk • contribs) 12:41, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
i see. Thanks for the reply, and keep up the good work! --Plastictv 14:34, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

TJHSST alumni

I reverted your edit of moving Mark Changisi to the TJ page from the TJHSST page. Mark was in the senior experience program at TJHSST, so he's an alumnus (even though he attended for one year!) Thesmothete 16:05, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

That's cool. Just curious: what's the senior experience program? ~a (user • talk • contribs) 16:10, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
It was a special one-year program during the first three years TJHSST was open. Seniors from other high schools could attend TJHSST for the year -- like a year abroad program. Thesmothete 05:26, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for deleting the attack on me. I have become accustomed to such obnoxious attacks and comments from people who are really crazy! regards. --Bhadani (talk) 18:54, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

No problem. Glad I could help. ~a (user • talk • contribs) 19:11, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi a, Bhadaniji is a magniloquocent personage. He will remember your service and mention you thankfully in his magnimum oppositus to be published soon. Herr=dab= 19:14, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Mkay. ~a (user • talk • contribs) 19:21, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Bank of India

You have tagged the page as unreferenced. However, the entire page is based on a A4 size 84 page book mentioned in the reference section of the article. The book named "The Bank of India Story" was released by the President of India. In case, you want, I will send you a scanned copy of the picture of the President releasing the book. I request you to please remove the unreference tag. Alternatively, there shall be no way out - but to convert the page to a stub of few words. It is up to you. Regards. --Bhadani (talk) 19:30, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Page numbers can be cited for at least some of it using the <ref> tag. ~a (user • talk • contribs) 19:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Ooof! I didn't mean for you to blank the page. It's just a minor issue, nothing that major. ~a (user • talk • contribs) 19:37, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Sorry to trouble you. I have condensed the contents and no unreference tag is required [1]. --Bhadani (talk) 19:38, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
No, the article was fine. I just think a few <ref> tags would be nice. ~a (user • talk • contribs) 19:39, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Referencing a book is perfectly kosher. Just using page numbers every once and a while makes things easier for the other Wikipedians. Also, an ISBN makes finding the book at the library easier. ~a (user • talk • contribs) 19:43, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

I am sorry for my premature action yesterday. Seeing the history of my contributions just before this would show that I was under a lot of stress on account of a troll's action. I am sorry friend. As regards, the Bank of India page, please do not worry - it will take a new shape - a better shape gradually, properly cited and well referenced. Best regards to my unknown friend who came to my rescue when that troll was creating disturbances. --Bhadani (talk) 17:23, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Kantoku follow-up

I'm not sure how this works. If you check out Japanese era names, you will see anomolies in the transfer of data from the Japanese Wikipedia to the English Wikipedia. Asit happens, there are quite a few era names (nengō in Japanese) which are not appropriately converted into an english Wikipedia article, as evidenced by red lettering rather than blue lettering. I was in the process of trying to modify another era name page as a template for one of the blanks ... and I guess you suggested that my effort should be deleted immediately. I guess if I had simply put {{hang on}} at the top of the text, it would have avoided this trivial problem? Should I insert this "hang-on" notice as a matter-of-course when I'm attending to the Japanese era names which are still in red lettering?

In a separate matter, I encountered messages telling me that I'd uploaded images without appropriate identification ... and when I attempted to respond with an inquiry, I encountered something which led me here -- nothing to do with images posted on the "Isaac Titsingh" page or elsewhere. So, I think I'm responding in a timely manner ... but I must say that, for me, this is pretty much of a shot in the dark ...? Qu'est-ce qu'on peut faire? Ooperhoofd 06:24, 2 May 2007 (UTC) [USERNAME: ooperhoofd]

To answer your first paragraph: You had put "This is the first step of a stub." on a page with no further context. In other words, there wasn't much there for me to read. I figured you might be working on the page, but I couldn't be sure. Instead of putting such a short page like that and adding to it, try putting something in your user name-space, like here: User:Ooperhoofd/Testing. You can put articles you are working on there. Then, when you've got the page ready for prime time, you can move the page to the main article name-space where other people will begin adding onto your work. Look at WP:FIRST for more information on creating articles.
To answer your second paragraph: I don't know what "Qu'est-ce qu'on peut faire" means. I didn't put the image upload messages on your talk page, however, I'm happy to help. IF all of your images were from the NYPL, then you can probably put {{subst:attribution|NYPL}} on each of the images: Image:Caron1663.jpg Image:Deshima 1852.jpg (the Ackerman image was already fixed by someone else). ~a (user • talk • contribs) 00:34, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

About a month ago you intervened in a situation on Talk:Sharon Janis. I wanted to say thanks for helping out. I did not participate then since I have an open mediation case regarding the other editors allegations about me. Nor did I wish to fuel the fire by responding on that talk page. I did not thank you then, since I felt it might appear inappropriate. Needless to say, it would've been just as inappropriate for me to continue the argument there. Given the nature of this editor's allegations I am unable to remain objective about them. Your calm and respectful manner towards the article and the other editor are greatly appreciated. Alas, there has been absolutely no activity on the mediation page. *sigh* Take care. TheRingess (talk) 23:12, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

I'm glad I could help! If you ever need a third opinion, feel free to message me. ~a (user • talk • contribs) 00:39, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

User: John leo

Thanks for your help with the above user. The articles he is writing are very poorly expressed. It's most frustrating. But thanks for the help! Gillyweed 12:25, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

I know the feeling. Glad I could help. ~a (user • talk • contribs) 12:34, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Concerning infinitecredit.com

An anon editor has requested an appeal of the adding of links to http://infinitecredit.com on Fair Credit Reporting Act and Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. According to this editor, the website's contents abides with WP:EL guidelines and is by no means spam. As the editor who deleted the link, you should check it out and see what's wrong with it. Feel free to reply at my talk page or WP:EAR. --Deryck C. 04:38, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Supporting trolling

Do not support trolling, especially to Rfc's and other major cases.--MONGO 21:55, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Sorry for the late response. I didn't notice this message here until just now. How have I supported trolling? Do you have a diff? ~a (user • talk • contribs) 21:38, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
Oh, are you referring to User talk:Spragory? Yeah, I didn't see him as a troll. I saw him as a new editor. ~a (user • talk • contribs) 21:50, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Confusion..

How is posting relevant, unbiased information considered a conflict of interest?

What is the conflict, exactly? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Getdave (talk • contribs).

Dave, You keep adding links to davesource.com. Over half of your edits contain a link to davesource.com. Almost all of your edits contain an external link to somewhere. Please add content, not links. ~a (user • talk • contribs) 13:33, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

So - again, how is this a conflict of interest?

And actually, only 4 out of the 9 pages I edited were adding external links (and not just to DaveSource). I *have* added content, and some content I have linked. From "WP:EL":

(What Should Be Linked) "Sites that contain neutral and accurate material that cannot be integrated into the Wikipedia article due to copyright issues,.."

I am unwilling to maintain, for example, my documentation on how to convert a big diesel to WVO on the Wikipedia site. So I am unwilling to integrate that into Wikipedia due to copyright issues (not to mention that it is arguably at a level of detail that steps outside of Wikipedia's scope).

Not everyone can write encyclopedic articles. That doesn't mean we can't contribute to making Wikipedia a useful information source. Looking at your edits it seems that the majority of your edits are not adding content either. There are many jobs at Wikipedia. —The preceding comment was added by Getdave (talk • contribs)

You might want to read the article on conflict of interest. "avoid, or exercise great caution when: Linking to the ... website of your organization". ~a (user • talk • contribs) 21:46, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Spoilers

There are certain editors here that are bound and determined to expunge the Spoiler warning. It seems like a courtesy to tell readers that they can expect to be "spoiled" here. Baseball Bugs 04:45, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Kindness Barnstar

The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
I award you this wonderful barnstar for reverting the vandalism on my userpage. Thankyou very much! :-) Lradrama 11:50, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks! ~a (user • talk • contribs) 23:08, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Pizza Delivery picture

If I understand, you reverted a picture on the pizza delivery page because the phone number is visible...a reasonable idea, I guess.

However, reverting does not help. The phone number is still there, and if you click on the image you will see it. I did not add the phone number, it is in the original. All I did was download the image and blow up the sign part, which anyone can do.

I think you should put it back.

thanks Lee.Sailer 01:22, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Blue Label Records

Maybe I'm confused, but I thought the article had been deleted through AfD. Oh, wait—I get it, it's because although it was started up as an AfD and was discussed, someone speedied it; is that right? Sorry for the mix-up and thanks for your help. Closenplay 18:36, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Rfa

Just dropping by to say "thank you" for supporting me in my recent my RfA. I passed the vote, and am now an admin. It will take me some getting used to with the new tools, but I thank you again for the trust. Have a good one, and, as always, happy editing! Jmlk17 05:15, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

A request

Hello there. If possible, do you think you could comment on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#I am unable to engage a user in mediation who continues to make allegations about me. This is regarding the allegations made about my edits to the Sharon Janis article. If it's not possible, thanks anyway. TheRingess (talk) 13:50, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

It's certainly possible, I wrote up a description of my interaction with Ganesham but I don't think it belongs on the Administrators' noticeboard. I'll post my description to any WP:DR case you open. Since I don't know much about WP:DR, I don't know what kind of thing you would want to open. Would an WP:RFC be the correct place? ~a (user • talk • contribs) 15:07, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi there. Thanks for helping. My frustration level is growing. This user seems to have formed the opinion that I'm evil and should be banished from Wikipedia. He seems to refuse any attempts on my part to demonstrate otherwise. *sigh* I'm afraid that if I continue having only 1 on 1 interaction with him that I'm going to lose my cool and say something that I will need to apologize for. I do have a mediation case open at Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-03-28 Guru Gita and you could post the description there. This mediation case is the less formal type of mediation. A request for comment might also help, but my understanding is that we usually put them on specific article talk pages or on user pages. Any ideas where a RFC might best be placed? Thanks for becoming involved. I sincerely hope that this issue will get resolved quickly and to everyone's benefit. BTW, currently I plan to not respond to Ganesham's comments on the admin noticeboard. I would prefer to respond to his comments when he chooses mediation. What do you think about this approach? Do you think that there is a particular comment I should address on the noticeboard?TheRingess (talk) 16:17, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
I didn't realize your mediation cabal case was still open. I think that's the best place to discuss this assuming the mediator and Ganesham are still up for it. ~a (user • talk • contribs) 17:36, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks again. I think the crux of my frustration is that the Mediation case has been open since March, Ganesham was politely notified of the mediation, by both myself and the mediator, yet he has not once responded on that mediation page. My solo attempts to encourage him to participate seem to have been met with deaf ears. I am so to speak, at wit's end. To me, his current response on the incident report could possibly sidetrack my concerns here; instead of participating in informal mediation he seems to wish to discuss more allegations. I have no problem with that, although I believe that a discussion of these new allegations does not belong on the incident report. I am afraid that we will not resolve the previous issues. He accuses me of using Wikipedia as a means of continuing a personal vendetta against some poor soul. I would never do something so morally reprehensible as using Wikipedia to defame, denigrate and abuse a fellow human being. He simply sees me as a guilty man attempting to hide his actions rather than an innocent man attempting to clear his name. My best recourse, is to trust the community by continually seeking 3rd opinions and showing good faith in attempting to address his concerns. I truly felt uncomfortable filing a report, since it represented a failure to resolve these concerns amicably. I only did so on the advice of another editor who responded to a helpme request. An incident report should have been the last resort, and I'm left wondering if I could've/should've done more before filing it. Once more, I truly appreciate and am very grateful that you are taking time to listen to my thoughts. Take care.TheRingess (talk) 17:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
Nope. I think you did the right thing. This guy is pestering you and he's not responding to WP:MEDCAB. The administrators on the noticeboard haven't had any helpful suggestions yet but that's fine. If he keeps pestering you, then I think going to WP:RFC would probably be your best course of action? Maybe, I don't know. Post something on my talk page if you end up opening some new dispute resolution thing. And . . . don't worry too much about "clearing" your name. I think most editors will take his accusatory comments in context. ~a (user • talk • contribs) 18:12, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
You are a voice of reason. I shall take your advice about worrying. Thanks.TheRingess (talk) 19:49, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
Apparently it's over now (at least for the time being) and the problem was me all along (I'm half cry-baby and half-dictator) boy who would want to have a reasonable conversation with such an evil being? Take care.TheRingess (talk) 23:57, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
"the problem was me all along" As I said before, you did the right thing. Let me know if you need help in the future. ~a (user • talk • contribs) 01:55, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
Will do, thanks again. BTW, if you haven't seen it he gives a farewell to Wikipedia message here, I figured that you would have seen it, but it gives context to my above statement.TheRingess (talk) 02:16, 9 June 2007 (UTC)


thank you

Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my user page! Trysha (talk) 03:38, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

No problem. ~a (user • talk • contribs) 23:09, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Ten Pound Hammer

The Barnstar of Good Humor
For posting a picture of a ten pound hammer on his talk page, Ten Pound Hammer and his otters award you the Barnstar of Good Humor. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 00:48, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks. ~a (user • talk • contribs) 23:08, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Regarding MSP page

Hey there, I wasn't trying to advertise. I am one of the selected MSPs for next year and I was just adding some information that I got via email. Especially the first line, which contradicts to the fact that the MSPs actually do get paid a small amount for their contributions. If you want, I can re-word it and post it again, but I was just posting and making changes because it's true and not because I want to advertise.

Thanks
jamjammy101
(link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Student_Partners)

DC Meetup notice

Greetings. There is going to be a Washington DC Wikipedia meetup on next Saturday, July 21st at 5pm in DC. Since you are listed in Category:Wikipedians_in_Virginia, I thought I'd invite you to come. I'm sorry about the short notice for the meeting. Hopefully we'll do somewhat better in that regard next time. If you can't come but want to make sure that you are informed of future meetings be sure to list yourself under "but let me know about future events", and if you don't want to get any future direct notices \(like this one\), you can list yourself under "I'm not interested in attending any others either" on the DC meetup page.--Gmaxwell 22:09, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

TJHSST Source

The source you're looking for is Tech cetera, TJHSST PTSA's newsletter.

http://leadership.tjhsst.edu/ptsa/documents/techcetera-2007-2008/Techcetera2007_AugSept.pdf Page 10

- WikiXan 03:03, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! ~a (user • talk • contribs) 12:03, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Revert

Hey, I never thanked you for this! Thanks. *Cremepuff222* 22:08, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

No problem.  :) ~a (user • talk • contribs) 23:57, 7 September 2007 (UTC)


20-20-20-20 club

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article 20-20-20-20 club, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. User:Pedant 17:28, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

I agree that it has "duplicate content" with 20-20-20 Club AND I agree that it should be deleted according to policy. When I first edited the article in question I didn't read the 20-20-20 Club article. My question is this, how exactly does WP:OWN come into play? Happy editing. ~a (user • talk • contribs) 18:13, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
When a user creates a content fork against the consensus of the community, he is acting as if the article he created is his own. Cheers! User:Pedant 02:04, 13 September 2007 (UTC)


speedy deletion?

Genesius Theatre seems like blatant advertising to me. what do you think? stolenbyme 21:24, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Hmmm. That's a good question. It's certainly overly grandiose about its description of things. And it's missing references to reliable sources. And it's trivia is completely dumb. I see a fair number of relevant and real google hits for the theater. I think the article probably should exist, but with 90% of the crap material stripped out. Let me try a first pass. ~a (user • talk • contribs) 22:23, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Oh my, WP:COPYVIO: http://www.genesiustheatre.org/about_us.php ~a (user • talk • contribs) 22:36, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
I'll add some references later. Right now I can't search the web very easily. ~a (user • talk • contribs) 22:45, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
well, i think it was created by the theatre staff since the text is a direct copy. if you look at the talk page, one of the staff members has posted his contact info which is why i figured it might fall under blatant advertising. i figured you know the wiki rules much better than me. :) stolenbyme 23:05, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Well, you're probably right. I didn't look at the talk page. I'll remove the "contact info". ~a (user • talk • contribs) 00:05, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Tania Head

Tania Head, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Tania Head satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tania Head and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Tania Head during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Edison 14:18, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Category:Homophobia

I noticed that you participated in the recent CfD of the category "Homophobia" [2]. It has been re-nominated for deletion, on the same grounds as before, and I was making sure you had an opportunity to present your interpretation of policy on this matter. The discussion can be found here. Best. --Cheeser1 14:39, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Outing editors

Hi, in response to your question, although it isn't a long dissertation on the subject WP:Privacy is the article you're probably looking for (right down at the bottom). All the best. ---- WebHamster 21:30, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

huh?

I didnt attack any1 --Question Bloke 20:25, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

I was referring to this edit and this edit (which was a revert to the first edit). Don't you think that is a personal attack? ~a (user • talk • contribs) 20:29, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Warning recieved

Hi Arichnad,

I see you placed a warning on my talk page regarding the lack of explanation i leave on user pages why i revert edits they made. 99% of the revision i make are to get swear words out of articles. Now call me crazy, but if someone places swear words in a text they know very well that what they are doing is wrong. I doubt leaving these users a message is going to change their behaviour, and frankly, seeing the huge amount of vandalism, i think i can better spend my time on more meaningfull things :)

In case you are refering to a specific case (Perhaps i made a mistake reverting?) please tell me which one you are refering to. I made over 200 vandalism reverts today, so its quite hard for me to guess which one you are talking about.

Kind regards, --Excirial 14:59, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

It's not exactly a warning. It's a note about warnings. I wasn't sure if I should use the template or leave a message of my own, I hope you don't mind. To be clear, I wasn't talking about a mistake you made; you've made no error.
Leaving vandals a message almost always works. It's very rare that a vandal doesn't stop (or get bored) before the fourth message. What's more, in the cases the vandal doesn't stop, WP:AIV can only go forward if the warnings are there. ~a (user • talk • contribs) 15:09, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:StKildaDesign.svg

Thanks for uploading Image:StKildaDesign.svg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 15:39, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

WP:MOBY

Hey, no worries. --Dweller 20:17, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

User talk:Hermannn21

This newbie has started to hit Paul Reubens, too. Block? Bearian 01:38, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

He's already been blocked apparently. ~a (user • talk • contribs) 01:39, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

72.76.14.66

  • User seems to be on a floating IP address. Other IP addresses in that range replaced pages and tagged them for deletion. Regardless, changing a page and then tagging is vandalism in my opinion. --~~

DC meetup #3

Interested in meeting-up with a bunch of your wiki-friends? Please take a quick look at Wikipedia:Meetup/DC 3 and give your input about the next meetup. Thank you.
This automated notice was delivered to you because you are on the Wikipedia:Meetup/DC/Invite. BrownBot 01:10, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Pee Wee Herman

Hi. I am trying to put together a checkuser request in relation to the "Pee Wee Herman" vandal, with a view to getting the underlying IPs blocked (I have range blocked some IPs used by the vandal(s) with limited success). I am putting together a list of sockpuppets and their edits here. As I see that you have been involved in dealing with this vandalism, I am letting you know and please feel free to contribute to the list. Cheers TigerShark (talk) 23:58, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Not only that, I am holding a brief in one hour. Be there! -Goodshoped 03:07, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Clan Grierson

On User talk:Bobo192, Arichnad said:
Hello, I'm looking at the Clan Grierson. Let me start by saying that it's a horribly horrible article and is in serious need of some TLC (it probably needs a rewrite). However, I'm not quite sure I understand why you reverted 100s of edits there. Thanks for your time.


Hi there. I guess with that article, I must have seen a particular link on that page, and reverted the inclusion of that link, however, I did not realize that that IP had in fact made so many contributions to the page. I don't know much about the subject of the article itself so I'm unable to make constructive comments on its content, but thank you for noticing that I had done this.

All the best. Bobo. 20:48, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

utc clock.js

Just found out about your UTC extension, and installed it right away. Thanks so far, and it's working great! However, I noticed that it displays "2 23:12", where 2 probably stands for December 2. Is there a way to alternatively display it as e.g. "12-02 23:12"? Also, I stumbled upon this at WT:EA, where J-stan had asked a related question about UTC clock and archiving. I might as well ask you, since I didn't understand what that was about? Where does one need the current time for archiving? I dorftrottel I talk I 23:14, December 2, 2007

Hello. I figured that I would know the month and year. Anyways, you can use "utc clock with month.js" now instead of "utc clock.js". I'm not sure why he needed the UTC time to archive, sorry. I use the UTC time to figure out how long ago something happened (something with a UTC timestamp). ~a (user • talk • contribs) 04:17, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks a lot. In the meantime, I found my way to Wikipedia:WikiProject User scripts/Scripts/Time. I copied the script to my userspace and fiddled around with it until I had the result I wanted. Take a look. Anyway, thanks again for your efforts! (and also sorry, I should look and try for myself before bothering others) I dorftrottel I talk I 04:27, December 3, 2007

Bauer College of Business

The notable alumni removed are leaders or former leaders of large Houston companies. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.198.35.17 (talk) 03:53, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Hello, I replied here ~a (user • talk • contribs) 06:00, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Kaplan University

Could use some help with Kaplan University page. User User:KAPLAD keeps removing any information they don't like, removes sourced information, reverts without explanation. The only page this user edits is the Kaplan page, which makes me think it's their marketing department. Please advise. Thanks! --averagejoe (talk) 16:01, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

I was in Las Vegas, Nevada last week. I have that article on my watchlist. I'll try to keep an eye out for it. If you see violation of NPOV or conflict of interest then use {{subst:uw-npov2|Article name}} only once. Mention in your edit summary that the editor was violating COI and NPOV. Next time, use {{subst:uw-npov3|Article name}} . . . {{subst:uw-npov4|Article name}}. I'll do the same if I notice the violation. ~a (user • talk • contribs) 07:00, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Ronald

Yep. The Valley News and Greensheet pic referred to in the article, and a newsletter from The North Valley Clown Alley (but it's anecdotal, based on an interview with Terry and George. I'm trying to get a copy of the Cavalcade of Clowns article that mentions it. I've seen (1980) the original costume as well.

The information at George Voorhis is IMO pure bs, see the reference, it's not a reference at all. I knew George and Terry and am certain that George's last name was not spelled with an 'i', and equally certain of the chronology. Willard came after George.

McDonalds may wish to change history, but the newspaper clearly shows Voorhees wearing the prototype costume, very plainly it was assembled hurriedly for the first performance, the hat, nose, and french-fry bag pockets are all actual items straight from McDonalds (the french fry bag pockets are actual french fry bags).

Willard Scott's claim is either an error or outright prevarication. It seems possible that MacDonalds themselves aren't presently aware of the origin of Ronald. I tend to doubt that, as (in the 60's) an agency hired by them actually sued George Voorhees to 'cease and desist' portraying Ronald, even though he only ever portrayed the character for MacDonalds. Terry Teene performed as R.M. as well (and prior to the 3 Scott tv spots), but I don't have documentation for that, it would be WP:OR to mention it at this point. User:Pedant (talk) 23:48, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

PS... this is an earlier version of the page from several years ago, before the memory hole started to suck away at the article. User:Pedant (talk) 23:52, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

sorry, my mistake

I ment to change my comment because I put the wrong revision. I was in a hurry and at a public computer, so I didn't even notice I changed yours. I guess from now on I'd better wait until I have more time to edit. NJGW (talk) 00:15, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

I haven't heard anything from the other editor since your comments, so this may have been resolved. Do agree with what I've proposed to do about the "vandalism" statement on the article's talk page here? NJGW (talk) 00:40, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
Correction, there was another exchange a little later, but that's been it. NJGW (talk) 00:41, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

thank you

Thank you very much for helping me out with my problem on how to upload and add the right tags for the image! Pseudoserpent (talk) 07:58, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Oh Yeah, glad I could help. ~a (user • talk • contribs) 08:22, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Dropping a line to help out a newer user

Hey, way back in May, you left a note for User:Azparkranger about using copyrighted information in the article Sweeney Ridge. I'm not sure if you know this, but information from the national park ranger's site is public domain -- they are employees of the US government and any work they produce is free for use by anyone. He was a bit worried that he might get in trouble if he used any more of the information from the website or other materials he produces while on the job, so I told him I'd leave a message explaining the situation. If I've misunderstood the situation or if you have any questions, just let me know. Thanks. Shell babelfish 22:47, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Where did I leave the note? (or what date in May?) I can't find it in the usual places I thought to look (user talk page, article history, article "what links here"). ~a (user • talk • contribs) 23:14, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
Ah. you had a typo. I think you meant User:Aznparkranger. Hold on. ~a (user • talk • contribs) 23:20, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, you've got the name right now, I removed the warning from the talk page, the direct link to the message you left was [3]. Thanks!Shell babelfish 23:22, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
Ok, now I see the note you were talking about. Yes, you've correctly assessed the situation. I probably shouldn't have left that note since, as you say, nps.gov is probably in the public domain. Without looking at the original text though, I can't say if the material actually belonged or not. Sorry! Hopefully I didn't scare anybody away. ~a (user • talk • contribs) 23:26, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Template: Timeline of iMac models

I have put the other editor's template in the discussion so that you may compare. I have also added some commentary. I did not note Kaomso's arguments against my proposals as he argues against them collectively, therefore I am unable to individually assign his counter-arguments. Butterfly0fdoom (talk) 03:08, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Arichnad/Archive_2&oldid=1139142172"