User talk:AreebSiddiqui14

July 2021

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Islamic banking and finance. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. [1] MrOllie (talk) 15:45, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. MrOllie (talk) 16:20, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MrOllie- i am not sure how my link was classified as inappropriate as I was just trying to cite my sources. Can i add the information bank and just leave the links out? — Preceding unsigned comment added by AreebSiddiqui14 (talk • contribs)

No, the advertising is a problem with or without the link. - MrOllie (talk) 16:36, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What if I properly disclosed my relationship with the entity on my User Talk page?

AreebSiddiqui14, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi AreebSiddiqui14! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
358	Exorcism in Islam (talk)	Add sources
60	Industrial loan company (talk)	Add sources
194	Sources of Sharia (talk)	Add sources
80	Majlis-ash-Shura (talk)	Add sources
148	Dubai Islamic Bank (talk)	Add sources
40	Shu'ubiyya (talk)	Add sources
40	Murari Chand College (talk)	Cleanup
299	Islam and violence (talk)	Cleanup
81	Islamic Relief (talk)	Cleanup
174	Islam and war (talk)	Expand
20	Islamic leadership (talk)	Expand
91	Islami Bank Bangladesh Ltd (talk)	Expand
2,168	The Vanguard Group (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,702	Finance (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
523	Khitan (circumcision) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
205	Islamic hygienical jurisprudence (talk)	Merge
74	Islamic view of miracles (talk)	Merge
68	Ex-Muslims (talk)	Merge
261	Islamic socialism (talk)	Wikify
559	Nikah mut'ah (talk)	Wikify
74	Protestantism and Islam (talk)	Wikify
4	Sharia advisor (talk)	Orphan
10	Stockspot (talk)	Orphan
5	Isfin (Islamic finance lawyers) (talk)	Orphan
186	Semantic Scholar (talk)	Stub
56	Advising bank (talk)	Stub
7	Ahmad El Najjar (talk)	Stub
7	Ethiscrowd (talk)	Stub
4	BMO SmartFolio (talk)	Stub
78	Maisir (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:13, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kestrl (August 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Jack Frost were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kestrl and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kestrl, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jack Frost (talk) 22:03, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Kestrl

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Kestrl, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GPL93 (talk) 16:05, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]